The Spillover Effect of the Medicare Mandatory Bundled Payment Program on Joint Replacement Outcomes Analysis of Patients with Commercial Insurance and Medicare Advantage

被引:4
|
作者
Kim, Hyunjee [1 ]
Hart, Kyle D. [1 ]
Meath, Thomas H. A. [1 ]
Zhu, Jane M. [2 ]
McConnell, K. John [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Ctr Hlth Syst Effectiveness, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Div Gen Internal Med, Portland, OR 97201 USA
来源
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CARE; STANDARDIZATION; DISCHARGE; QUALITY; KNEE;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.21.00259
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: To improve the value and efficiency of care among traditional Medicare enrollees, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has implemented alternative payment models designed to control health-care spending and improve quality. These models may affect care beyond traditional Medicare enrollees, "spilling over" into other populations. Established in April 2016, the Medicare mandatory bundled payment program, called the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model, holds hospitals accountable for spending and quality of care for traditional Medicare joint-replacement patients during care episodes that span from the index hospitalization to 90 days post-discharge. We assessed the extent to which the CJR model was associated with outcomes for patients enrolled in commercial insurance and Medicare Advantage plans. Methods: With use of Health Care Cost Institute claims data from 2012 through 2017, we assessed the association of the CJR model with total expenditures, discharges to institutional post-acute care, and readmissions among commercial insurance and Medicare Advantage joint-replacement patients. The exposure variable was the implementation of the CJR model in 67 randomly selected metropolitan statistical areas compared with 103 similar areas without CJR implementation. We utilized difference-in-differences models to estimate the spillover effects of the CJR model by comparing outcomes between these areas before and after CJR implementation. Results: The study included 174,893 joint-replacement episodes of care in commercial insurance enrollees and 202,070 episodes in Medicare Advantage enrollees. Among both commercial insurance and Medicare Advantage enrollees, CJR implementation was associated with no meaningful changes in total episode expenditures, discharges to institutional post-acute care, or readmissions. Conclusions: We found no evidence for spillover effects of the CJR model on commercial insurance and Medicare Advantage patients, suggesting that alternative payment models targeting traditional Medicare patients may have limited effects on the cost and quality of care for patients outside of the traditional Medicare system.
引用
收藏
页码:621 / 629
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Association of the Mandatory Medicare Bundled Payment With Joint Replacement Outcomes in Hospitals With Disadvantaged Patients
    Kim, Hyunjee
    Meath, Thomas H. A.
    Dobbertin, Konrad
    Quinones, Ana R.
    Ibrahim, Said A.
    McConnell, K. John
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2019, 2 (11)
  • [2] Association Between Medicare's Mandatory Joint Replacement Bundled Payment Program and Post-Acute Care Use in Medicare Advantage
    Wilcock, Andrew D.
    Barnett, Michael L.
    McWilliams, J. Michael
    Grabowski, David C.
    Mehrotra, Ateev
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2020, 155 (01) : 82 - 84
  • [3] Outcomes by Race and Ethnicity Following a Medicare Bundled Payment Program for Joint Replacement
    Kim, Narae
    Jacobson, Mireille
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (09)
  • [4] Association Between a Bundled Payment Program for Lower Extremity Joint Replacement and Patient Outcomes Among Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries
    Sutherland, Amanda
    Boudreau, Emily
    Bowe, Andy
    Huang, Qian
    Liao, Joshua M.
    Flagg, Matthew
    Cousins, Deborah
    Antol, Dana Drzayich
    Shrank, William H.
    Powers, Brian W.
    Navathe, Amol S.
    [J]. JAMA HEALTH FORUM, 2023, 4 (06):
  • [5] Medicare's Bundled Payment Program for Joint Replacement Promise and Peril?
    Fisher, Elliott S.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 316 (12): : 1262 - 1264
  • [6] Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes in Patients with Medicare, Medicare Advantage, and Commercial Insurance
    Starring, Hunter
    Waddell, William H.
    Steward, William
    Schexnayder, Stuart
    McKay, Jack
    Leonardi, Claudia
    Bronstone, Amy
    Dasa, Vinod
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2020, 33 (09) : 919 - 926
  • [7] Medicare Bundled Payment Programs for Joint Replacement Anatomy of a Successful Payment Reform
    Ryan, Andrew M.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 320 (09): : 877 - 879
  • [8] Association of Medicare Mandatory Bundled Payment System for Hip and Knee Joint Replacement With Racial/Ethnic Difference in Joint Replacement Care
    Kim, Hyunjee
    Meath, Thomas H. A.
    Tran, Felix W.
    Quinones, Ana R.
    McConnell, K. John
    Ibrahim, Said A.
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (09)
  • [9] Association of Mandatory Bundled Payments for Joint Replacement With Use of Postacute Care Among Medicare Advantage Enrollees
    Meyers, David J.
    Kosar, Cyrus M.
    Rahman, Momotazur
    Mor, Vincent
    Trivedi, Amal N.
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2019, 2 (12) : E1918535
  • [10] National Representativeness Of Hospitals And Markets In Medicare's Mandatory Bundled Payment Program
    Liao, Joshua M.
    Emanuel, Ezekiel J.
    Polsky, Daniel E.
    Huang, Qian
    Shah, Yash
    Zhu, Jingsan
    Lyon, Zoe M.
    Dykstra, Sarah E.
    Dinh, Claire T.
    Cousins, Deborah S.
    Navathe, Amol S.
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2019, 38 (01) : 44 - 53