THE AMERICAN BOARD OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE MAINTENANCE OF CERTIFICATION SUMMIT

被引:3
|
作者
Counselman, Francis L. [1 ]
Carius, Michael L. [2 ]
Kowalenko, Terry [3 ]
Battaglioli, Nicole [4 ]
Hobgood, Cherri [5 ]
Jagoda, Andy S. [6 ]
Lovell, Elise [7 ,8 ]
Oshva, Lillian [9 ]
Patel, Anant [10 ]
Shayne, Philip [11 ]
Tabas, Jeffrey A. [12 ]
Reisdorff, Earl J. [13 ]
机构
[1] Eastern Virginia Med Sch, Dept Emergency Med, Norfolk, VA 23501 USA
[2] Norwalk Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Norwalk, CT 06856 USA
[3] Oakland Univ, William Beaumont Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Royal Oak, MI USA
[4] York Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, York, PA USA
[5] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[6] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, New York, NY 10029 USA
[7] Univ Illinois, Dept Emergency Med, Chicago, IL USA
[8] Advocate Christ Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Oak Lawn, IL USA
[9] NYU, Dept Emergency Med, CTSI Sci Review Comm SRC, New York, NY USA
[10] John Peter Smith Hlth Network, Ft Worth, TX USA
[11] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Educ Program, Atlanta, GA USA
[12] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, Dept Clin Emergency Med, San Francisco, CA USA
[13] Amer Board Emergency Med, E Lansing, MI 48823 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE | 2015年 / 49卷 / 05期
关键词
maintenance of certification; quality improvement; American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM); SELF-ASSESSMENT; PHYSICIANS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.06.058
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: The American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) convened a summit of stake-holders in Emergency Medicine (EM) to critically review the ABEM Maintenance of Certification (MOC) Program. Objective: The newly introduced American Board ofMedical Specialties (ABMS) 2015MOC Standards require that the ABMS Member Boards, including ABEM, "engage in continual quality monitoring and improvement of its Program for MOC.'' ABEM sought to have the EMcommunity participate in the quality improvement process. Discussion: A review of the ABMS philosophy of MOC and requirements for MOC were presented, followed by an exposition of the ABEM MOC Program. Roundtable discussions included strengths of the program and opportunities for improvement; defining, teaching, and assessing professionalism; identifying and filling competency gaps; and enhancing relevancy and adding value to the ABEM MOC Program. Conclusions: Several suggestions to improve the ABEM MOC Program were discussed. ABEM will consider these recommendations when developing its next revision of the ABEM MOC Program. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:722 / 728
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条