Bar workers' health and environmental tobacco smoke exposure (BHETSE): symptomatic improvement in bar staff following smoke-free legislation in Scotland

被引:45
|
作者
Ayres, J. G. [1 ]
Semple, S. [1 ,2 ]
MacCalman, L. [2 ]
Dempsey, S. [2 ]
Hilton, S. [3 ]
Hurley, J. F. [2 ]
Miller, B. G. [2 ]
Naji, A. [1 ]
Petticrew, M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Liberty Safe Work Res Ctr, Dept Environm & Occupat Med, Aberdeen, Scotland
[2] Inst Occupat Med, Edinburgh EH8 9SV, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Univ Glasgow, MRC, Social & Publ Hlth Sci Unit, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[4] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Publ & Environm Hlth Res Unit, London WC1, England
关键词
PASSIVE SMOKING; AIR;
D O I
10.1136/oem.2008.040311
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine changes in the health of bar workers after smoke-free legislation was introduced. Design: Longitudinal study following bar workers from before legislation introduction, at 2 months after introduction and at 1 year to control for seasonal differences. Setting: Bars across a range of socio-economic settings in Scotland. Participants: 371 bar workers recruited from 72 bars. Intervention: Introduction of smoke-free legislation prohibiting smoking in enclosed public places, including bars. Main outcomes measures: Change in prevalence of self-reported respiratory and sensory symptoms. Results: Of the 191 (51%) workers seen at 1-year followup, the percentage reporting any respiratory symptom fell from 69% to 57% (p= 0.02) and for sensory symptoms from 75% to 64% (p= 0.02) following reductions in exposure, effects being greater at 2 months, probably partly due to seasonal effects. Excluding respondents who reported having a cold at either baseline or 1 year, the reduction in respiratory symptoms was similar although greater for "any'' sensory symptom (69% falling to 54%, p= 0.011). For non-smokers (n= 57) the reductions in reported symptoms were significant for phlegm production (32% to 14%, p= 0.011) and red/irritated eyes (44% to 18%, p= 0.001). Wheeze (48% to 31%, p= 0.006) and breathlessness (42% to 29%, p= 0.038) improved significantly in smokers. There was no relationship between change in salivary cotinine levels and change in symptoms. Conclusions: Bar workers in Scotland reported significantly fewer respiratory and sensory symptoms 1 year after their working environment became smoke free. As these improvements, controlled for seasonal variations, were seen in both non-smokers and smokers, smoke-free working environments may have potentially important benefits even for smokers.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 346
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Responding to change: how did bar workers adapt to the smoke-free legislation in Scotland?
    Eadie, Douglas R.
    MacAskill, Susan G.
    Heim, Derek
    Hastings, Gerard B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH, 2010, 20 (01) : 13 - 26
  • [2] Bar workers' exposure to second-hand smoke: The effect of scottish smoke-free legislation on occupational exposure
    Semple, Sean
    Maccalman, Laura
    Naji, Audrey Atherton
    Dempsey, Scott
    Hilton, Shona
    Miller, Brian G.
    Ayres, Jon G.
    [J]. ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE, 2007, 51 (07): : 571 - 580
  • [3] Expectations and changing attitudes of bar workers before and after the implementation of smoke-free legislation in Scotland
    Hilton, Shona
    Semple, Sean
    Miller, Brian G.
    MacCalman, Laura
    Petticrew, Mark
    Dempsey, Scott
    Naji, Audrey
    Ayres, Jon G.
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2007, 7 (1)
  • [4] Expectations and changing attitudes of bar workers before and after the implementation of smoke-free legislation in Scotland
    Shona Hilton
    Sean Semple
    Brian G Miller
    Laura MacCalman
    Mark Petticrew
    Scott Dempsey
    Audrey Naji
    Jon G Ayres
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 7
  • [5] Legislation for smoke-free workplaces and health of bar workers in Ireland: before and after study
    Allwright, S
    Paul, G
    Greiner, B
    Mullally, BJ
    Pursell, L
    Kelly, A
    Bonner, B
    D'Eath, M
    McConnell, B
    McLaughlin, JP
    O'Donovan, D
    O'Kane, E
    Perry, IJ
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 331 (7525): : 1117 - +
  • [6] The effect of the Irish smoke-free workplace legislation on smoking among bar workers
    Mullally, Bernie J.
    Greiner, Birgit A.
    Allwright, Shane
    Paul, Gillian
    Perry, Ivan J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2009, 19 (02): : 206 - 211
  • [7] Impact of the smoke-free legislation on the prevalence and referred time exposure to the environmental tobacco smoke in Zaragoza
    Villaverde Royo, Maria Victoria
    Marin Izaguerri, Maria Pilar
    Requeno Jarabo, Maria Nuria
    Val Esco, Laura
    Coronas Mateos, Sonia
    Cordoba-Garcia, Rodrigo
    [J]. ATENCION PRIMARIA, 2012, 44 (10): : 603 - 610
  • [8] Evaluation of the Immediate Impact of the Washington, DC, Smoke-Free Indoor Air Policy on Bar Employee Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure
    Pearson, Jennifer
    Windsor, Richard
    El-Mohandes, Ayman
    Perry, David C.
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2009, 124 : 135 - 142
  • [9] Observations from behind the bar: changing patrons' behaviours in response to smoke-free legislation in Scotland
    Shona Hilton
    Jane Cameron
    Alice MacLean
    Mark Petticrew
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 8
  • [10] Observations from behind the bar: changing patrons' behaviours in response to smoke-free legislation in Scotland
    Hilton, Shona
    Cameron, Jane
    MacLean, Alice
    Petticrew, Mark
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2008, 8 (1)