Comparison of Water Sensitive Paper and Glass Strip Sampling Approaches to Access Spray Deposit by UAV Sprayers

被引:9
|
作者
Ahmad, Fiaz [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Songchao [1 ,2 ]
Qiu, Baijing [2 ]
Ma, Jing [2 ]
Xin, Huang [2 ]
Qiu, Wei [4 ]
Ahmed, Shibbir [2 ]
Chandio, Farman Ali [5 ]
Khaliq, Aftab [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Inst Agr Mech, Minist Agr & Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Agr Engn, Zhenjiang 212013, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Bahauddin Zakariya Univ, Dept Agr Engn, Multan 60800, Pakistan
[4] Nanjing Agr Univ, Coll Engn, Nanjing 210031, Peoples R China
[5] Sindh Agr Univ, Fac Agr Engn, Dept Farm Power & Machinery, Tandojam 70060, Pakistan
来源
AGRONOMY-BASEL | 2022年 / 12卷 / 06期
关键词
UAV sprayers; sampling approach; depositions; water-sensitive paper; glass sampler; UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; DROPLET DEPOSITION; DRIFT; ADJUVANTS; EFFICACY; QUALITY; HEIGHT; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3390/agronomy12061302
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Target and off-target spray depositions determine the spray's effectiveness and impact on the environment. A decisive stage in the measurement of spray deposition and drift is selecting an appropriate sampling approach under field conditions. There are various approaches available for sampling spray deposition and drift, during the evaluation of ground sprayers used for the UAV sprayer assessment, under field conditions. In this study, two sampling approaches (water-sensitive paper, and glass strip collectors) were compared to analyze spray deposition in target and off-target zones. The results showed a variation in the estimation of the spray deposits among the two applied sampling methods. The results showed that the water-sensitive paper recorded the droplet deposition in the target zone with a range from 0.049 to 4.866 mu Lcm(-2), whereas the glass strip recorded from 0.11 to 0.793 mu Lcm(-2). The results also showed the water sensitive paper recorded an 80.3% higher deposition than that of the glass strip at zero position during the driving flight height 2 m and flight speed 2 ms(-1) (T1 treatment). It can be concluded that variation in recorded depositing is due to the sampling material. It is recommended that the confident deposition results, measurement methods and sampling approaches must be standardized for UAV sprayers according to the field conditions and controlled within artificial assessments.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据