Missouri-Specific Crash Prediction Model for Signalized Intersections

被引:4
|
作者
Claros, Boris [1 ]
Sun, Carlos [1 ]
Edara, Praveen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Civil Engn, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
CALIBRATION;
D O I
10.1177/0361198118768526
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The Highway Safety Manual (HSM) provides guidance and tools to conduct quantitative safety analysis. Crash prediction models are used to estimate the expected number of crashes per year, by facility type, severity, and crash type. There are two approaches for applying the HSM crash prediction methodology to local conditions: (1) calibration of models provided in the HSM; or (2) development of jurisdiction-specific models. There are some instances in which model calibration may not be appropriate. To illustrate this case, 601 urban signalized four-leg intersections (U4SG) in Missouri were used to obtain the calibration factor, assess the quality of the calibration factor, and develop jurisdiction-specific models. For U4SG total crashes, the calibration factor for Missouri conditions was 3.98 (standard deviation, 0.13). The assessment of the calibration factor showed a disproportional difference between the observed data in Missouri and the HSM model. Thus, the calibration was deemed inappropriate and the development of Missouri-specific models was supported. The models were developed for severities Fatal and Injury (FI) and Property Damage Only (PDO) crashes. The predictor variables considered were intersection AADT, posted speed limit, signal control type, exclusive left turn lanes, exclusive right turn lanes, right turn on red prohibited, and facilities of interest within 1,000 ft from the intersection (bus stops, schools, and alcohol sale establishments). Functional forms for all predictor variables were optimized. The log-likelihood, inverse overdispersion, and Cumulative Residuals (CURE) plots showed satisfactory measures of model accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 42
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Seasonal crash prediction model for urban signalized intersections: Wisconsin southeast region
    Claros, Boris
    Chitturi, Madhav
    Vorhes, Glenn
    Bill, Andi
    Noyce, David
    [J]. TRAFFIC INJURY PREVENTION, 2020, 21 (07) : 447 - 452
  • [2] Crash Patterns at Signalized Intersections
    Polders, Evelien
    Daniels, Stijn
    Hermans, Elke
    Brijs, Tom
    Wets, Geert
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2015, (2514) : 105 - 116
  • [3] A novel approach for real time crash prediction at signalized intersections
    Zheng, Lai
    Sayed, Tarek
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 117
  • [4] Exploring the overall and specific crash severity levels at signalized intersections
    Abdel-Aty, M
    Keller, J
    [J]. ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2005, 37 (03): : 417 - 425
  • [5] Impacts of nongeometric attributes on crash prediction at urban signalized intersections of developing countries
    Islam, Md Rakibul
    Barua, Saurav
    Akter, Shanjeeda
    Hadiuzzaman, Md
    Haque, Nazmul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & SECURITY, 2020, 12 (05) : 671 - 696
  • [6] Modelling crash frequencies at signalized intersections with a truncated count data model
    Kim, Do-Gyeong
    Lee, Yuhwa
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN SCIENCES, 2013, 17 (01) : 85 - 94
  • [7] Pedestrian crash estimation models for signalized intersections
    Pulugurtha, Srinivas S.
    Sambhara, Venkata R.
    [J]. ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2011, 43 (01): : 439 - 446
  • [8] Motorcycle crash prediction model for signalised intersections
    Quddus, MA
    Chin, HC
    Wang, J
    [J]. URBAN TRANSPORT VII: URBAN TRANSPORT AND THE ENVIRONMENT IN THE 21ST CENTURY, 2001, 8 : 609 - 617
  • [9] Right-angle crash occurrence at signalized intersections
    Wang, Xuesong
    Abdel-Aty, Mohamed
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2007, (2019) : 156 - 168
  • [10] PREDICTION OF PEDESTRIAN RISK AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
    Hamidun, Rizati
    Ishak, Siti Zaharah
    Kordi, Nurul Elma
    Endut, Intan Rohani
    [J]. JURNAL TEKNOLOGI, 2016, 78 (5-2): : 69 - 74