A Rational Mining Strategy for Proof-of-Work Consensus Algorithms

被引:0
|
作者
Basile, M. [1 ]
Nardini, G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Perazzo, P. [1 ]
Dini, G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Dept Ingn & Informaz, Largo Lucio Lazzarino 1, Pisa, Italy
[2] Ctr Logist Syst, Via Pensieri 60, Livorno, Italy
[3] Univ Pisa, Pisa, Italy
关键词
Blockchain; PoW; Mining Strategy; Orphan Block; Block Reward;
D O I
10.1109/BRAINS55737.2022.9909327
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
To maintain a secured, universal state of a blockchain, Proof-of-Work consensus algorithms economically incentivize miners to compete for block creation through hashingbased challenge solving. Nowadays, the default mining strategy consists in including as many transactions as possible in a block so as to maximize the block reward. Unfortunately, this strategy also maximizes the risk of block orphaning. In this work, we propose a rational mining strategy that carefully balances the trade-off between the block reward and the risk of block orphaning. The strategy is designed so that the chance to get a block reward is higher than the default strategy chance. Furthermore, the strategy is flexible as it provides a degree of freedom of how much larger this chance should be. We analytically study the long-term economic advantage of the proposed approach and derive the condition under which the long-term reward is higher than the one of the default strategy. Finally, we validate the proposed strategy based on a case study analysis method against Bitcoin and Ethereum and show that the higher the risk of block orphaning the more convenient the strategy happens to be.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 66
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance Evaluation of Proof-of-Work and Collatz Conjecture Consensus Algorithms
    Aljassas, Hamad Mousa A.
    Sasi, Sreela
    [J]. 2019 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER APPLICATIONS & INFORMATION SECURITY (ICCAIS), 2019,
  • [2] Is the Cost of Proof-of-Work Consensus Quasilinear?
    Asgaonkar, Aditya
    Palande, Pranav
    Joshi, Ramprasad S.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACM INDIA JOINT INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DATA (CODS-COMAD'18), 2018, : 314 - 317
  • [3] Preventing proof-of-work mining attacks
    Azimy, Hamid
    Ghorbani, Ali A.
    Bagheri, Ebrahim
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2022, 608 : 1503 - 1523
  • [4] Energy Equilibria in Proof-of-Work Mining
    Fiat, Amos
    Karlin, Anna
    Koutsoupias, Elias
    Papadimitriou, Christos
    [J]. ACM EC '19: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 ACM CONFERENCE ON ECONOMICS AND COMPUTATION, 2019, : 489 - 502
  • [5] StrongChain: Transparent and Collaborative Proof-of-Work Consensus
    Szalachowski, Pawel
    Reijsbergen, Daniel
    Homoliak, Ivan
    Sun, Siwei
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 28TH USENIX SECURITY SYMPOSIUM, 2019, : 819 - 836
  • [6] Optimal mining in proof-of-work blockchain protocols
    Soria, Jorge
    Moya, Jorge
    Mohazab, Amin
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 53
  • [7] Proof-of-Work cryptocurrency mining: a statistical approach to fairness
    Li, Sheng-Nan
    Yang, Zhao
    Tessone, Claudio J.
    [J]. 2020 IEEE/CIC INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS IN CHINA (ICCC WORKSHOPS), 2020, : 156 - 161
  • [8] Empirical risk analysis of mining a Proof-of-Work blockchain
    Albrecher, Hansjorg
    Finger, Dina
    Goffard, Pierre-O.
    [J]. DECISIONS IN ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2024,
  • [9] On the trade-offs of Proof-of-Work algorithms in blockchains
    Chin, Zi Hau
    Yap, Timothy Tzen Vun
    Tan, Ian K. T.
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (ICCST 2019), 2020, 603 : 575 - 584
  • [10] RDV: An Alternative To Proof-of-Work And A Real Decentralized Consensus For Blockchain
    Solat, Siamak
    [J]. BLOCKSYS'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST BLOCKCHAIN-ENABLED NETWORKED SENSOR SYSTEMS, 2018, : 25 - 32