Glucose management for rewards: A randomized trial to improve glucose monitoring and associated self-management behaviors in adolescents with type 1 diabetes

被引:14
|
作者
Wagner, Julie A. [1 ,2 ]
Petry, Nancy M. [2 ]
Weyman, Kate [3 ]
Tichy, Eileen [3 ]
Cengiz, Eda [3 ]
Zajac, Kristyn [2 ]
Tamborlane, William V. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Sch Dent Med, Behav Sci & Community Hlth, Farmington, CT 06032 USA
[2] Univ Connecticut, Sch Med, Farmington, CT USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Yale Childrens Diabet Program, New Haven, CT USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
adolescents; reinforcement; self-monitoring of blood glucose; type; 1; diabetes; EXCHANGE CLINIC REGISTRY; CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; BLOOD-GLUCOSE; YOUNG-ADULTS; NATIONWIDE DISSEMINATION; PSYCHOSOCIAL TREATMENT; WEIGHT-LOSS; ADHERENCE; INTERVENTIONS;
D O I
10.1111/pedi.12889
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background This randomized, controlled trial evaluated a monetary-based reinforcement intervention for increasing self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) among youth with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes. Methods After a 2-week baseline, 60 participants were randomized to enhanced usual care (EUC) or Reinforcers. The Reinforcers group earned monetary rewards for SMBG and associated behaviors such as uploading glucose meters. Reinforcers were withdrawn at 24 weeks. A follow-up evaluation occurred at 36 weeks. Results Participants in the reinforcers group increased the proportion of days they completed >= 4 SMBG from 14.6% at baseline to 64.4%, 47.5%, and 37.8% at 6, 12, and 24 weeks, respectively. In contrast, EUC participants declined from 22.7% at baseline to 17.5%, 10.5%, and 11.1% (Ps < .01 vs EUC at all time points). Group differences were attenuated but remained significant after withdrawal of reinforcers. Effect sizes for SMBG were very large during reinforcement and large after withdrawal of reinforcers. In the reinforcers group, mean A1c dropped from 9.5% +/- 1.2% at baseline to 9.0% +/- 1.3% at week 6 and 9.0% +/- 1.4% at week 12. For EUC, A1c was 9.2% +/- 0.2% at baseline and ranged from 9.2% +/- 1.5% to 9.6% +/- 1.6% throughout the study (P < .05 vs EUC). Group differences in A1c were no longer significant at weeks 24 and 36. Effect sizes for A1c were small during reinforcement and also after withdrawal of reinforcement. Conclusions Monetary-based reinforcement of adolescents with type 1 diabetes caused durable increases in SMBG. Modification of the reinforcement structure may be needed to sustain improved metabolic control in this challenging age group.
引用
收藏
页码:997 / 1006
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The foundation of diabetes self-management: Glucose monitoring
    Banerji, Mary Ann
    [J]. DIABETES EDUCATOR, 2007, 33 : 87S - 90S
  • [2] AN INTERNET INTERVENTION TO IMPROVE SELF-MANAGEMENT IN ADOLESCENTS WITH TYPE 1 DIABETES: INITIAL RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED TRIAL
    Mulvaney, Shelagh
    Rothman, Russell
    Wallston, Ken
    Lybarger, Cindy
    Osborn, Chandra
    Mary, Dietrich
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2010, 39 : 57 - 57
  • [3] Pump It Up! A randomized clinical trial to optimize insulin pump self-management behaviors in adolescents with type 1 diabetes
    O'Donnell, Holly K.
    Vigers, Tim
    Johnson, Suzanne Bennett
    Pyle, Laura
    Wright, Nancy
    Deeb, Larry C.
    Driscoll, Kimberly A.
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2021, 102
  • [4] Promoting self-management behaviors in adolescents with type 1 diabetes, using digital storytelling: a pilot randomized controlled trial
    Nahid Zarifsaniey
    Masoomeh Otrodi Shirazi
    Manoosh Mehrabi
    Zahra Bagheri
    [J]. BMC Endocrine Disorders, 22
  • [5] Promoting self-management behaviors in adolescents with type 1 diabetes, using digital storytelling: a pilot randomized controlled trial
    Zarifsaniey, Nahid
    Shirazi, Masoomeh Otrodi
    Mehrabi, Manoosh
    Bagheri, Zahra
    [J]. BMC ENDOCRINE DISORDERS, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [6] Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Self-management of Type 2 Diabetes: A Paradigm Shift
    Cox, Daniel J.
    Taylor, Ann G.
    Moncrief, Matthew
    Diamond, Anne
    Yancy, William S., Jr.
    Hegde, Shefali
    McCall, Anthony L.
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2016, 39 (05) : E71 - E73
  • [7] Randomized trial of a diabetes self-management education and family teamwork intervention in adolescents with Type 1 diabetes
    Murphy, H. R.
    Wadham, C.
    Hassler-Hurst, J.
    Rayman, G.
    Skinner, T. C.
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2012, 29 (08) : E249 - E254
  • [8] Continuity of care, self-management behaviors, and glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes
    Parchman, ML
    Pugh, JA
    Noël, PH
    Larme, AC
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2002, 40 (02) : 137 - 144
  • [9] Motivational interviewing to improve self-management in youth with type 1 diabetes: A randomized clinical trial
    Al Ksir, Kawther
    Wood, David L.
    Hasni, Yosra
    Sahli, Jihene
    Quinn, Megan
    Ghardallou, Meriam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC NURSING-NURSING CARE OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, 2022, 66 : E116 - E121
  • [10] Effects of a Diabetes Self-Management Education Program on Glucose Levels and Self-Care in Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    Romero-Castillo, Rocio
    Pabon-Carrasco, Manuel
    Jimenez-Picon, Nerea
    Antonio Ponce-Blandon, Jose
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (23)