Positive predictive values of CMV-IgM and importance of CMV-IgG avidity testing in detecting primary infection in three different clinical settings. A French retrospective cohort study

被引:8
|
作者
Perillaud-Dubois, Claire [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Bouthry, Elise [1 ,2 ]
Jadoui, Abir [1 ]
Leng, Ay-Ling [1 ]
Roque-Afonso, Anne-Marie [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Vauloup-Fellous, Christelle [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Saclay, Hop Paul Brousse, AP HP, Serv Virol, 12-14 Ave Paul Vaillant Couturier, F-94804 Villejuif, France
[2] Grp Rech Infect Pendant Grossesse GRIG, Velizy Villacoublay, France
[3] IAME, INSERM UMR1137, F-75018 Paris, France
[4] Univ Paris Saclay, F-94804 Villejuif, France
[5] INSERM U1193, F-94804 Villejuif, France
关键词
CMV; Serology; IgM; Avidity; PPV; Positive predictive value; Pregnancy; Ultrasound abnormalities; Clinical signs; CONGENITAL CYTOMEGALOVIRUS-INFECTION; IMMUNOGLOBULIN-M; DIAGNOSIS; ANTIBODY; RISK; PREVALENCE; PREGNANCY; BLOT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104641
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: Diagnosis of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) primary infection during pregnancy or in immunocompetent patients relies on serology with detection of specific CMV-IgG and IgM. In case of positive CMV-IgM in pregnant women, CMV-IgG avidity is now widely recommended, but in general population it is not currently performed. Objective: In this study, we aimed to determine CMV-IgM positive predictive values (PPV) in different clinical settings. Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective study on positive CMV-IgM in our virology laboratory from 2013 to 2019, in three clinical groups: screening in non-symptomatic pregnant women (group 1), pregnant women with ultrasound (US) abnormalities (group 2) and patients (general population) with clinical signs suggestive of CMV primary infection (group 3). CMV-IgG avidity had been performed in all cases allowing to evaluate PPV of positive CMV-IgM to diagnose CMV primary-infection in each group. Results: Between 2013 and 2019, 6859 serum samples were found positive for CMV-IgM and had been tested for CMV-IgG avidity, with 6560 sera for group 1, 30 for group 2 and 269 for group 3. Overall, low avidity confirming primary infection was observed respectively in 16.4 % for group 1, 36.7 % for group 2, and 35.3 % for group 3. CMV-IgM PPV was significantly lower in group 1 compared to groups 2 (p = 0.01) and 3 (p < 0.001). Discussion: Our observations highlight the major importance of including CMV-IgG avidity in the diagnostic algorithm, whatever the clinical situation (for immunocompetent patients), to confirm or exclude a recent CMV primary infection in case of positive CMV-IgM.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据