Beneficial and harmful effects of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

被引:24
|
作者
Nielsen, Emil Eik [1 ,2 ]
Feinberg, Joshua Buron [1 ,2 ]
Bu, Fan-Long [3 ]
Olsen, Michael Hecht [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Raymond, Ilan [1 ]
Steensgaard-Hansen, Frank [1 ]
Jakobsen, Janus Christian [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Holbaek Cent Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Cardiol Sect, Holbaek, Denmark
[2] Univ Southern Denmark, Inst Reg Hlth Res, Odense, Denmark
[3] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Childrens Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Southern Denmark, Odense Univ Hosp, Ctr Individualized Med Arterial Dis CIMA, Odense, Denmark
[5] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshosp, Ctr Clin Intervent Res, Dept 7812,Copenhagen Trial Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark
来源
OPEN HEART | 2020年 / 7卷 / 02期
关键词
heart failure; heart failure treatment; renin-angiotensin system; EJECTION FRACTION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; ENALAPRIL; ETIOLOGY; HF;
D O I
10.1136/openhrt-2020-001294
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Current guidelines recommend angiotensin receptor blocker neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) (sacubitril/valsartan) as a replacement for angiotensin-converting-enzymeinhibitor (ACE-I) in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who remain symptomatic despite optimal medical therapy. The effects of ARNIs have not previously been assessed in a systematic review. We searched for relevant trials until October 2019 in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, BIOSIS, CNKI, VIP, WanFang and CBM. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and serious adverse events. We systematically assessed the risks of random errors and systematic errors. PROSPERO registration: CRD42019129336. 48 trials randomising 19 086 participants were included. The ARNI assessed in all trials was sacubitril/valsartan. ACE-I or ARB were used as control interventions. Trials randomising HFrEF participants (27 trials) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) participants (four trials) were analysed separately. In HFrEF participants, meta-analyses and Trial Sequential Analyses showed evidence of a beneficial effect of sacubitril/valsartan when assessing all-cause mortality (risk ratio (RR), 0.86; 95% CI, 0.79 to 0.94) and serious adverse events (RR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.86 to 0.93); and the results did not differ between the guideline recommended target population and HFrEF participants in general. We found no evidence of an effect of sacubitril/valsartan in HFpEF participants. Sacubitril/valsartan compared with either ACE-I or ARB seems to have a beneficial effect in patients with HFrEF. Our results indicate that sacubitril/valsartan might be beneficial in a wider population of patients with heart failure than the guideline recommended target population. Sacubitril/valsartan does not seem to show evidence of a difference compared with valsartan in patients with HFpEF.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of sacubitril valsartan on renal function in adults with heart failure: a systematic review and meta analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Hernandez, A. V.
    Barboza, J. J.
    Pasupuleti, V.
    Piscoya, A.
    Roman, Y. M.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2022, 43 : 958 - 958
  • [2] Sacubitril/Valsartan for heart failure A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dai, Wenqin
    Luo, Jinlan
    Huang, Xianli
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (23) : E29149
  • [3] Benefits and adverse effects of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with chronic heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Charuel, Elodie
    Menini, Thibault
    Bedhomme, Sabrina
    Pereira, Bruno
    Pinol-Domenech, Nathalie
    Bouchant, Suzy
    Boussageon, Remy
    Buoef-Gibot, Sylvaine
    Vaillant-Roussel, Helene
    PHARMACOLOGY RESEARCH & PERSPECTIVES, 2021, 9 (05):
  • [4] Benefits and adverse effects of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with chronic heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Berkhout, Christophe
    EXERCER-LA REVUE FRANCOPHONE DE MEDECINE GENERALE, 2022, (181): : 115 - 116
  • [5] Effects of sacubitril/valsartan on life quality in chronic heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Song, Yinyin
    Zhao, Zinan
    Zhang, Jingwen
    Zhao, Fei
    Jin, Pengfei
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [6] Combination of diuretics for acute heart failure: a protocol for a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with network meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
    Nahiz, Nihal
    Lukoschewitz, Jasmin Dam
    Seven, Ekim
    Olsen El Caidi, Nora
    Hove, Jens Dahlgaard
    Jakobsen, Janus
    Grand, Johannes
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (04):
  • [7] Ivabradine for coronary artery disease and/or heart failure—a protocol for a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
    M. Maagaard
    E. E. Nielsen
    C. Gluud
    J. C. Jakobsen
    Systematic Reviews, 8
  • [8] Comparison of Outcomes Between Sacubitril/Valsartan and Enalapril in Patients With Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Reyaz, Ibrahim
    Kaur, Avneet
    Saad, Moyal Z.
    Kanumuri, Manisha
    Nistala, Hari Priya
    Usman, Sumyyia
    Olivas, Celene
    Palleti, Sujith K.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (11)
  • [9] Evaluating the impact of Sacubitril/valsartan on diastolic function in patients with heart failure A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Jinfu
    Song, Yanbin
    Chen, Fengyun
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (19) : E37965
  • [10] Efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with acute decompensated heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    David, B. J.
    Tugade, R. E.
    Gerodias, F. J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2023, 44 : 54 - 54