Integration of seismic refraction tomography and electrical resistivity tomography in engineering geophysics for soil characterization

被引:11
|
作者
Al-Heety, Ahmed J. R. [1 ]
Shanshal, Zainab M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mosul, Coll Sci, Dept Geol, Mosul, Iraq
关键词
Refraction tomography; Electrical resistivity tomography; Site investigation; Inversion; 2D imaging; 2D;
D O I
10.1007/s12517-015-2116-9
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The use of both seismic refraction tomography (SRT) and electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) techniques have commonly been used to detect physical properties in the subsuiface materials in order to map the subsuiface geological features and soil characterization in the site investigations. Using of both techniques increases confidence in interpretation to limit inaccurate interpretation due to the large amount of heterogeneity in the near surface. Twelve shallow seismic refractions and ten profiles for electrical resistivity were conducted in the Teaching Hospital Project site in Mosul University, Iraq. The linear arrays by using 12 geophones with 10 Hz frequency are used to SRT while ERT traverses were conducted with a total length (280 m) by using Wenner array with an initial electrode spacing of 3 m. Both SRT and ERT data were acquire and interpreted using SRT method and ERT methods to create tomogram velocity models and two dimension resistivity images by using the Seislmager/2D and RES2DINV software, respectively. The seismic velocity values show that the site has three layers. just as follows: the first one cot -responded to recent superficial deposits and is characterized by low velocity ranging from about 340 to about 700 mis. The second one corresponded mostly to the river deposits composed especially of river terraces and clays are characterized by relatively highest velocity values ranging from about 840 mis to about 1700 mis. The third one corresponded to the upper part of Fat'ha (Lower Fars) formation which is mostly composed of marl layers and is characterized by high velocity ranging from about 1900 m/s to about 2800 mis. Interpretations of 2D resistivity profiles indicated alteration zones at depth. It was determined that the material could be classified into two main zones. The first zone has a relatively high true resistivity value ranging from about 80 to about 320 Omega m with a thickness ranging from about 1 to about 25 m, which is mainly consisted of conglomerate, gravel and sand (weathered layer). The second zone has a relatively low true resistivity value reached to 80 Omega m which represents upper part of Fat'ha (Lower Fars) formation deposits which mainly consisted of clays. The two geophysical methods were used to be enjoined the better way to aid the interpretation and evaluate the significance and reliability of the results obtained in each single method. It is demonstrated that engineering geophysics is able to provide solutions for determining subsurface properties and that different prospection techniques are necessary for developing a reasonable model of the subsurface structure. Hence, the third layer is suggesting for engineering and foundation purposes.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integration of seismic refraction tomography and electrical resistivity tomography in engineering geophysics for soil characterization
    Ahmed J. R. Al-Heety
    Zainab M. Shanshal
    [J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2016, 9
  • [2] Integration of Electrical Resistivity Tomography and Seismic Refraction Tomography to Investigate Subsiding Sinkholes in Karst Areas
    Jabrane, Oussama
    Martinez-Pagan, Pedro
    Martinez-Segura, Marcos A.
    Alcala, Francisco Javier
    El Azzab, Driss
    Vasconez-Maza, Marco D.
    Charroud, Mohammed
    [J]. WATER, 2023, 15 (12)
  • [3] Electrical resistivity and seismic refraction tomography to detect buried cavities
    Cardarelli, Ettore
    Cercato, Michele
    Cerreto, Antonio
    Di Filippo, Gerardina
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2010, 58 (04) : 685 - 695
  • [4] Insight into seismic refraction and electrical resistivity tomography techniques in subsurface investigations
    Akingboye, Adedibu Sunny
    Ogunyele, Abimbola Chris
    [J]. RUDARSKO-GEOLOSKO-NAFTNI ZBORNIK, 2019, 34 (01): : 93 - 111
  • [5] SEISMIC TOMOGRAPHY IN THE PROBLEMS OF ENGINEERING GEOPHYSICS
    TIKHONOV, AN
    GONCHARSKII, AV
    MATVIENKO, AN
    PIKUS, II
    IAKUBOV, VA
    [J]. DOKLADY AKADEMII NAUK SSSR, 1989, 304 (04): : 840 - 844
  • [6] Foundation Evaluation of a Repeater Installation Building using Electrical Resistivity Tomography and Seismic Refraction Tomography
    Butchibabu, B.
    Khan, Prosanta K.
    Jha, P. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENGINEERING GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 24 (01) : 27 - 38
  • [7] Evaluation of Semanggol Formation (Permian Facies) Using Electrical Resistivity Tomography and Seismic Refraction Tomography Parameter
    Hisham, Hazrul
    Nordiana, M. M.
    Jia, Teoh Ying
    [J]. SOUTHEAST ASIAN CONFERENCE ON GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 62
  • [8] Joint interpretation of seismic refraction tomography and electrical resistivity tomography by cluster analysis to detect buried cavities
    Carollo, Alessandra
    Capizzi, Patrizia
    Martorana, Raffaele
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 178
  • [9] JOINT INVERSION OF ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY AND SEISMIC REFRACTION TOMOGRAPHY IN REDUCING INTERPRETATION AMBIGUITY
    Doyoro, Yonatan Garkebo
    Chang, Ping-Yu
    [J]. 19TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASIA OCEANIA GEOSCIENCES SOCIETY, AOGS 2022, 2023, : 95 - 97
  • [10] Soil characterization using electrical resistivity tomography and geotechnical investigations
    Sudha, Kumari
    Israil, M.
    Mittal, S.
    Rai, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2009, 67 (01) : 74 - 79