Plasma and Tissue Cefazolin Concentrations in Obese Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery and Receiving Differing Pre-Operative Doses of Drug

被引:39
|
作者
Stitely, Michael [1 ]
Sweet, Michael [2 ]
Slain, Douglas [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Alons, Lindsy [7 ]
Holls, William [7 ]
Hochberg, Charles [7 ]
Briggs, Frank [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Dunedin Sch Med, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Dunedin, New Zealand
[2] W Virginia Univ, Ctr Qual Outcomes, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[3] W Virginia Univ, Dept Clin Pharm, Sch Pharm, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[4] W Virginia Univ, Dept Infect Dis, Sch Pharm, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[5] W Virginia Univ, Dept Clin Pharm, Sch Med, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[6] W Virginia Univ, Dept Infect Dis, Sch Med, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[7] W Virginia Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
关键词
SURGICAL SITE INFECTION; ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS; RISK-FACTORS; SURVEILLANCE; SECTION; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1089/sur.2012.040
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: Patients undergoing cesarean delivery typically receive a 1-g to 2-g dose of cefazolin as pre-operative antibacterial prophylaxis. This traditional dosage may not provide an adequate tissue concentration of cefazolin in obese patients during the peri-operative period. This study compared the tissue concentrations of prophylactic cefazolin administered as a either a 2-g or a 4-g dose prior to cesarean delivery in obese patients. Methods: Twenty obese patients (first trimester body mass index [BMI] >35) who underwent cesarean delivery completed this randomized study. Eleven patients received 2g of cefazolin, and nine received 4g. Blood and subcutaneous tissues were collected at the times of the incision and closure. Myometrial biopsies were collected at uterine closure. A cefazolin concentration threshold of 4mcg/g for tissue samples was used as a surrogate adequate concentration. Plasma and tissue cefazolin concentrations were compared for the two doses. Results: Mean plasma, umbilical cord, and myometrial cefazolin concentrations were significantly higher in the 4-g treatment group (p<0.05). Subcutaneous incision site tissue obtained at time of incision creation also was significantly higher in the 4-g group than in the 2-g group (40.1124.10mcg/g vs. 18.36 +/- 6.68mcg/g; p=0.0005). Subcutaneous tissue concentrations at closure were significantly different in the two dosage groups (34.89 +/- 17.42mcg/g vs. 21.73 +/- 16.02mcg/g; p=0.044). All tissue samples were above the target of 4mcg/g. Body morphometry did not correlate with the variability in cefazolin tissue concentration. No surgical site infections, endometritis, or other adverse effects were observed. Conclusions: Administering a prophylactic dose of 4g of cefazolin produced blood and tissue cefazolin concentrations that were significantly higher than concentrations obtained from a 2-g dose in patients with BMIs between 35 and 60kg/m(2) undergoing cesarean delivery. It is unclear if the larger cefazolin dose produces a more protective anti-infective effect than that obtained with the more traditional 2-g dose for cesarean delivery in obese patients.
引用
收藏
页码:455 / 459
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Effectiveness of Pre-Operative Cefazolin in Obese Patients
    Unger, Nathan R.
    Stein, Bradley J.
    [J]. SURGICAL INFECTIONS, 2014, 15 (04) : 412 - 416
  • [2] ASSOCIATION BETWEEN PRE-OPERATIVE CEFAZOLIN DOSE AND SURGICAL SITE INFECTION IN OBESE PATIENTS
    Peppard, William
    Eberle, David
    Mabrey, Danielle
    Weigelt, John
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 43 (12)
  • [3] Association between Pre-Operative Cefazolin Dose and Surgical Site Infection in Obese Patients
    Peppard, William J.
    Eberle, David G.
    Kugler, Nathan W.
    Mabrey, Danielle M.
    Weigelt, John A.
    [J]. SURGICAL INFECTIONS, 2017, 18 (04) : 485 - 490
  • [4] Population Pharmacokinetics of Cefazolin in Serum and Adipose Tissue From Overweight and Obese Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery
    Grupper, Mordechai
    Kuti, Joseph L.
    Swank, Morgan L.
    Maggio, Lindsay
    Hughes, Brenna L.
    Nicolau, David P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 57 (06): : 712 - 719
  • [5] Pre-operative Weight Loss Program for Obese Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Gastrectomy
    Kashihara, Hideya
    Shimada, Mitsuo
    Yoshikawa, Kozo
    Higashijima, Jun
    Tokunaga, Takuya
    Nishi, Masaaki
    Takasu, Chie
    Yoshimoto, Toshiaki
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INVESTIGATION, 2021, 68 (1-2): : 165 - 169
  • [6] Does current cefazolin dosing achieve adequate tissue and blood concentrations in obese women undergoing cesarean section?
    Kram, Jessica J. F.
    Greer, Danielle M.
    Cabrera, Omar
    Burlage, Robert
    Forgie, Marie M.
    Siddiqui, Danish S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2017, 210 : 334 - 341
  • [7] Content and delivery of pre-operative interventions for patients undergoing total knee replacement: a rapid review
    Anna M. Anderson
    Benjamin T. Drew
    Deborah Antcliff
    Anthony C. Redmond
    Christine Comer
    Toby O. Smith
    Gretl A. McHugh
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 11
  • [8] Content and delivery of pre-operative interventions for patients undergoing total knee replacement: a rapid review
    Anderson, Anna M.
    Drew, Benjamin T.
    Antcliff, Deborah
    Redmond, Anthony C.
    Comer, Christine
    Smith, Toby O.
    McHugh, Gretl A.
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [9] Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue and Serum Concentrations of Cefazolin in Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Surgery
    Houwink, Aletta P. I.
    Brill, Margreke J. E.
    Schmidt, Stephan
    van Dongen, Eric P. A.
    van Ramshorst, Bert
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2012, 108 : 260 - 261
  • [10] A NOVEL ALGORITHM OPTIMIZING REFERRAL FOR PRE-OPERATIVE CARDIAC EVALUATION IN OBESE PATIENTS UNDERGOING BARIATRIC SURGERY
    Ibrahim, Kaitlyn
    Eddy, Vikram J.
    Bernard, Patricia
    McComb, Joseph
    Keane, Martin
    Whitman, Isaac R.
    Soans, Rohit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 75 (11) : 3605 - 3605