Cost-benefit study of different application scenarios in teleradiology

被引:8
|
作者
Heckermann, D [1 ]
Wetekam, V [1 ]
Hundt, W [1 ]
Reiser, M [1 ]
机构
[1] SIEMENS AG, MED TECHN, D-91052 ERLANGEN, GERMANY
来源
RADIOLOGE | 1997年 / 37卷 / 04期
关键词
teleradiology; cost-benefit; dynamic investment methods;
D O I
10.1007/s001170050213
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
With the increasing number of users and technical improvements, there are several application scenarios of teleradiology. To perform a cost-benefit analysis, an approach is presented, which focuses on both monetary and qualitative aspects. Process-related, qualitative and quantitative evaluations are described. The prestudy compares the radiological workflow before and after the introduction of a teleradiology system. A scoring model is part of the qualitative evaluation. The quantitative study Focuses on costs and savings. Amortisation and a net present value of savings versus costs can be derived using dynamic investment methods. Savings can be achieved after a short time under ideal conditions, but there is no guarantee for a reimbursement for all systems.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 293
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-benefit study of different application scenarios in teleradiology
    D. Heckermann
    V. Wetekam
    W. Hundt
    M. Reiser
    [J]. Der Radiologe, 1997, 37 : 285 - 293
  • [2] Concept and applicability of the KAMEDIN teleradiology system in view of a cost-benefit analysis
    Lehmann, KJ
    Walz, M
    Bolte, R
    Georgi, M
    Schinkmann, M
    Busch, C
    [J]. RADIOLOGE, 1997, 37 (04): : 278 - 284
  • [3] Concept and applicability of the KAMEDIN teleradiology system in view of a cost-benefit analysis
    K. J. Lehmann
    M. Walz
    R. Bolte
    M. Georgi
    M. Schinkmann
    C. Busch
    [J]. Der Radiologe, 1997, 37 : 278 - 284
  • [4] The cost-benefit evaluation based on ecosystem services under different ecological restoration scenarios
    Li, Mingqi
    Liu, Shiliang
    Liu, Yixuan
    Sun, Yongxiu
    Wang, Fangfang
    Dong, Shikui
    An, Yi
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2021, 193 (07)
  • [5] METHODOLOGY AND APPLICATION OF COST-BENEFIT ANALYSES
    AHMED, S
    WEAVER, WW
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1981, 38 (JUN): : 489 - 491
  • [6] COST-BENEFIT STUDY OF 3 YEARS TOPICAL FLUORIDE APPLICATION
    VRBIC, V
    KOSMELJ, B
    [J]. CARIES RESEARCH, 1978, 12 (02) : 116 - 116
  • [7] Cost-benefit analysis of energy scenarios for the Mexican power sector
    Islas, J
    Manzini, F
    Martínez, M
    [J]. ENERGY, 2003, 28 (10) : 979 - 992
  • [8] COST-BENEFIT
    RUSSELL, JGB
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1987, 60 (715): : 731 - 731
  • [9] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF PACEMAKER
    FABRICIUS, J
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1978, : 35 - 37
  • [10] The theory and application of cost-benefit analysis - Reply
    Lumley, S
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 24 (01) : 121 - 123