Suspension of Anti-dumping Measures in the EU: A New Trend or Not?

被引:0
|
作者
Kim, Jin Woo [1 ]
机构
[1] ReedSmith LLP, Pittsburgh, PA 15222 USA
来源
GLOBAL TRADE AND CUSTOMS JOURNAL | 2022年 / 17卷 / 05期
关键词
EU trade defense instruments; anti-dumping; suspension;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
Suspension of anti-dumping ('AD') measures is an exceptional tool available to the European Commission to be used under exceptional circumstances. In accordance with Article 14(4) of the basic AD Regulation, the Commission may suspend AD measures, if market conditions have temporarily changed to an extent that injury would be unlikely to resume as a result of the suspension. Although the suspension is not common, the Commission decided to suspend AD measures concerning imports of certain aluminium fiat-rolled products ('AFRP') from China in October 2021. However, the Commission decided not to suspend AD measures concerning imports of birch plywood originating in Russia in December 2021. Better economic performance of Union producers in the post-investigation period (IP), or the absence thereof was the main difference between the AFRP and birch plywood cases that led the Commission to reach the opposite conclusion. Given that the Commission recently suspended AD measures in the AFRP case, we may see more suspension requests from Union users and importers, and non-EU exporting producers. As a result, the Commission may initiate a few review investigations on suspension. However, the suspension will remain an exceptional tool and we will see a limited of cases of suspension.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 217
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EU anti-dumping action
    [J]. Textile Month, (JUN.):
  • [2] Anti-dumping - EU acts on Russian AN
    不详
    [J]. EUROPEAN CHEMICAL NEWS, 1998, 69 (1797): : 11 - 11
  • [3] EU Lobbying and Anti-Dumping Policy
    Nielsen, Jorgen Ulff-Moller
    Svendsen, Gert Tinggaard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WORLD TRADE, 2012, 46 (01) : 187 - 211
  • [4] Determinants of withdrawals of anti-dumping complaints in the EU
    Rutkowski, Aleksander
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC POLICY REFORM, 2007, 10 (02) : 89 - 109
  • [5] Dumping and anti-dumping measures from a competition and allocation perspective
    Conrad, CA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WORLD TRADE, 2002, 36 (03) : 563 - 575
  • [6] Inward Processing in EU Anti-Dumping Proceedings
    Willems, Amoud
    Natens, Bregt
    Kamau, Maryanne
    [J]. GLOBAL TRADE AND CUSTOMS JOURNAL, 2022, 17 (06): : 233 - 240
  • [7] Interest groups and EU anti-dumping policy
    De Bievre, Dirk
    Eckhardt, Jappe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2011, 18 (03) : 339 - 360
  • [8] Anti-dumping measures: A widespread commercial phenomenon
    Nyahoho, Emmanuel
    Lefebvre, Cedrick
    Malbouires, Claire
    [J]. ETUDES INTERNATIONALES, 2007, 38 (03): : 361 - 381
  • [9] Applying the MFN Principle to WTO Anti-dumping Law: An Opportunity for Curbing the Use of Anti-dumping Measures
    Mahncke, Hans
    [J]. LEGAL ISSUES OF ECONOMIC INTEGRATION, 2014, 41 (02): : 169 - 191
  • [10] THE EFFECTS OF THE EU ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES ON CHINESE-LISTED EXPORTERS - A MESOECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE
    Wang, Shuying
    You, Yiling
    Wang, Chao
    Zuo, Xiya
    [J]. SINGAPORE ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2024,