University Lecturers' Views on Student-Lecturer Evaluations

被引:1
|
作者
Makondo, Livingstone [1 ]
Ndebele, Clever [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Venda, Ctr Higher Educ Teaching & Learning, ZA-0950 Thohoyandou, South Africa
来源
ANTHROPOLOGIST | 2014年 / 17卷 / 02期
关键词
Rating; Student Feedback; Grading Leniency; Quality; Effectiveness; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1080/09720073.2014.11891447
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
This paper discusses university lecturers' views on student-lecturer evaluation of teaching and learning process. Specific reference is given to the university lecturers' views on the usefulness of the evaluation exercise, the evaluation process, items in the evaluation questionnaires and evaluation feedback reports at a formerly disadvantaged South African University. A total of 118 (53.8%) lecturers out of a staff establishment of 219 teaching staff volunteered their participation in this study. Participating lecturers in this descriptive survey design that used predominantly a quantitative approach, were given the opportunity to make their comments based on the results of the student-lecturer evaluation findings. Data were then analysed using content analysis and emerging themes were identified and discussed. The findings of the study show that insights from student-lecturer evaluations are an important source of information for university teaching staff and administration to consider in their quest to improve on the quality of university teaching and learning moves that can help improve on throughput rates. Based on the findings, we conclude that student-lecturer evaluations are beneficial and recommend that their contributions be taken with an open mind alongside other sources of data such as peer evaluations.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 386
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] IMPACT OF WEB TECHNOLOGIES ON STUDENT-LECTURER RELATIONSHIP
    Alshahrani, Saeed
    Ward, Rupert
    7TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED2013), 2013, : 4576 - 4579
  • [2] Mobile Technology in the Classroom: What Drives Student-Lecturer Interactions?
    Gan, Chin Lay
    Balakrishnan, Vimala
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2018, 34 (07) : 666 - 679
  • [3] Social network sites and student-lecturer communication: an academic voice
    Jones, Joanna
    Gaffney-Rhys, Ruth
    Jones, Edward
    JOURNAL OF FURTHER AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2011, 35 (02) : 201 - 219
  • [4] Student Engagement and Learning using an Integrated Student-Lecturer Engagement Design Framework
    Huei, Yoong Cheah
    2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TEACHING, ASSESSMENT AND LEARNING (TALE), 2014, : 79 - 85
  • [5] Knowledge creation and sharing through student-lecturer collaborative group coursework
    Georgiadou, Elli
    Siakas, Kerstin
    Berki, Eleni
    Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Management, ECKM, 2006, : 678 - 689
  • [6] Perceptions of lecturers of student evaluations of their teaching
    Chikazinga, Wanangwa Wanyasulu Nyirenda
    INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION JOURNAL-COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES, 2018, 17 (04): : 36 - 48
  • [7] Why lecturers still matter: the impact of lecturer-student exchange on student engagement and intention to leave university prematurely
    Ben Farr-Wharton
    Michael B. Charles
    Robyn Keast
    Geoff Woolcott
    Daniel Chamberlain
    Higher Education, 2018, 75 : 167 - 185
  • [8] Why lecturers still matter: the impact of lecturer-student exchange on student engagement and intention to leave university prematurely
    Farr-Wharton, Ben
    Charles, Michael B.
    Keast, Robyn
    Woolcott, Geoff
    Chamberlain, Daniel
    HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 75 (01) : 167 - 185
  • [9] Predicting acceptance of mobile technology for aiding student-lecturer interactions: An empirical study
    Gan, Chin Lay
    Balakrishnan, Vimala
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 33 (02) : 143 - 158
  • [10] Gender, student confidence and communicative styles at university: the views of lecturers in history and psychology
    Robson, J
    Francis, B
    Read, B
    STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2004, 29 (01) : 7 - 23