Direct and indirect energy use in China and the United States

被引:18
|
作者
Liu, Hongtao [1 ]
Polenske, Karen R. [2 ]
Martins Guilhoto, Joaquim Jose [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Xi, Youmin [6 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Sch Management, Xian 710072, Shannxi, Peoples R China
[2] MIT, Dept Urban Studies & Planning, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, FEA, Dept Econ, BR-05508 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Univ Illinois, REAL, Chicago, IL 60680 USA
[5] MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[6] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Management, Xian, Peoples R China
关键词
Input-output analysis; Structural decomposition analysis; Energy; INPUT-OUTPUT-ANALYSIS; CO2; EMISSIONS; INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; FINAL CONSUMPTION; INCOME; DECOMPOSITION; ECONOMY; EXPORTS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2014.04.089
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Greenhouse gas reduction and energy saving are becoming two important issues in both industrialized and developing countries, and policymakers are developing means to reduce total domestic energy use. We evaluate and compare the direct and the indirect energy use both in the People's Republic of China (China) and the United States of America (US) by looking at a series of hybrid energy input output tables (1997, 2002, and 2007). We also apply SDA (structural decomposition analysis), to identify the factors causing energy intensity (energy use per unit of gross domestic product) to differ between the two countries, which lead to potential energy-saving options. Our results show that, besides the differences in direct energy use, huge differences also exist in indirect energy use between the two countries. Differences in indirect energy use are mainly due to differences in technology. Technological change and industrial-structure change are key factors to explain the inequality of energy intensity, while there is a significant trend towards the convergence of sectoral energy efficiency between the two countries. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:414 / 420
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Direct and indirect urban water footprints of the United States
    Chini, Christopher M.
    Konar, Megan
    Stillwell, Ashlynn S.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2017, 53 (01) : 316 - 327
  • [2] Direct and Indirect Household Energy Consumption in China
    Li, Zhijie
    Qi, Zhongying
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF INDUSTRY AND ECONOMY, PTS 1 AND 2, 2014, 869-870 : 844 - 847
  • [3] Comparison of building energy use data between the United States and China
    Xia, Jianjun
    Hong, Tianzhen
    Shen, Qi
    Feng, Wei
    Yang, Le
    Im, Piljae
    Lu, Alison
    Bhandari, Mahabir
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2014, 78 : 165 - 175
  • [4] THE PRICE OF UNITED-STATES EXPORTS AND THE MIX OF UNITED-STATES DIRECT AND INDIRECT TAXES
    ALIBER, RZ
    STEIN, H
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1964, 54 (05): : 703 - 710
  • [5] DIRECT AND INDIRECT ENERGY USE FOR COMMERCIAL AVIATION
    HIRST, E
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH, 1974, 8 (4-5): : 427 - 432
  • [6] The direct and indirect costs of untreated insomnia in adults in the United States
    Ozminkowski, Ronald J.
    Wang, Shaohung
    Walsh, James K.
    [J]. SLEEP, 2007, 30 (03) : 263 - 273
  • [7] Direct and indirect energy consumption of rural households in China
    Wang, Wenwen
    Zhang, Ming
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2015, 79 (03) : 1693 - 1705
  • [8] Direct and indirect energy consumption of rural households in China
    Wenwen Wang
    Ming Zhang
    [J]. Natural Hazards, 2015, 79 : 1693 - 1705
  • [9] Estimating Direct and Indirect Protective Effect of Influenza Vaccination in the United States
    Arinaminpathy, Nimalan
    Kim, Inkyu Kevin
    Gargiullo, Paul
    Haber, Michael
    Foppa, Ivo M.
    Gambhir, Manoj
    Bresee, Joseph
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 186 (01) : 92 - 100
  • [10] Direct and Indirect Economic Burden of Chronic Liver Disease in the United States
    Stepanova, Maria
    De Avila, Leyla
    Afendy, Mariam
    Younossi, Issah
    Huong Pham
    Cable, Rebecca
    Younossi, Zobair M.
    [J]. CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 15 (05) : 759 - +