Comparison of the Effects of Haloperidol and Midazolam on Reduction of Adverse Psychotomimetic Reactions after Induction of Anesthesia with Ketamine in Adults

被引:0
|
作者
Takzare, Alireza [1 ]
Maghsudlou, Maziar [1 ]
Espahbodi, Ebrahim [1 ]
Hariri, Shahram Bagheri [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Anaesthesiol Dept, Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, 21 Dameshgh St,Vali E Asr Ave, Tehran 1416753955, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Emergency Med Dept, 21 Dameshgh St,Vali E Asr Ave, Tehran 1416753955, Iran
关键词
Ketamine; Adverse Psychological Reactions; Haloperidol; Midazolam; DELIRIUM; PROPHYLAXIS; AGITATION; SEDATION; RISK;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
As an anesthetic agent, ketamine is associated with a number of adverse psychological reactions after patient recovery (Motamed et. al., 2012). Midazolam is currently used to mitigate such adverse reactions. However, they still cause discomfort in patients and sometimes their next of kin. The present study aimed to compare the effect of midazolam and haloperidol on decreasing these adverse psychological reactions. In this clinical trial, patients who were subjected to anesthesia induction by ketamine were randomly divided into haloperidol, midazolam, and distilled water (as control) groups. All patients underwent orthopedic surgery with a maximum duration of 2 hours. After the recovery of the patients, a questionnaire was completed by the anesthesiologist. In addition to demographic data, the questionnaire included a number of questions about adverse psychological reactions such as inaudible speech, uncontrollable crying and laughter, strange feelings, illusions, anxiety, and agitation. After completing the questionnaires, the data were introduced into SPSS and analyzed with statistical tests. A total of 60 patients including 30 men and 30 women were enrolled in the study. The mean age of the patients was 32.9 +/- 9.5 years ranging from 16 to 50 years. Twenty patients received the premedication (pre-anesthetic drug) haloperidol before the induction of anesthesia, 26 patients received midazolam, and 14patients received distilled water. The patients were similar in terms of age, gender, and ASA group. The recovery time for midazolam and haloperidol was significantly longer than that of distilled water (p=0.02). In addition, the number of adverse psychological reactions were significantly higher in the midazolam (p=0.02) and haloperidol (p=0.04) groups than in the distilled water group. However, they occurred less often in midazolam group than the haloperidol group with no significant difference. Haloperidol can reduce the adverse psychological reactions of ketamine, but this reduction is not as prominent as midazolam.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 115
页数:4
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] RECTAL INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA IN CHILDREN - A COMPARISON BETWEEN KETAMINE-MIDAZOLAM AND HALOTHANE FOR INDUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF ANESTHESIA
    HOLMKNUDSEN, R
    NYGARD, E
    LAUB, M
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1989, 33 (06) : 518 - 521
  • [2] Recovery of horses from general anesthesia after induction with propofol and ketamine versus midazolam and ketamine
    Jarrett, M. A.
    Bailey, K. M.
    Messenger, K. M.
    Prange, T.
    Gaines, B.
    Posner, L. P.
    [J]. PFERDEHEILKUNDE, 2018, 34 (06): : 574 - 574
  • [3] Recovery of horses from general anesthesia after induction with propofol and ketamine versus midazolam and ketamine
    Jarrett, Melanie A.
    Bailey, Kate M.
    Messenger, Kristen M.
    Prange, Timo
    Gaines, Brian
    Posner, Lysa P.
    [J]. JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 253 (01): : 101 - 107
  • [4] A COMPARISON OF HEMODYNAMIC EFFECTS OF ETOMIDATE-MIDAZOLAM AND KETAMINE-MIDAZOLAM FOR ANESTHESIA INDUCTION IN CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING SURGERY
    Pirat, A.
    Komurcu, O.
    Camkiran, A.
    Arslan, G.
    Bayraktar, N.
    Sezgin, A.
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 39 : S414 - S414
  • [5] Induction of anesthesia and recovery in donkeys sedated with xylazine: a comparison of midazolam-alfaxalone and midazolam-ketamine
    Maney, Jill K.
    Durham, H. Edward, Jr.
    Goucher, Kathleen P.
    Little, Erika L.
    [J]. VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2018, 45 (04) : 539 - 544
  • [6] Histamine release during the induction of anesthesia with propofol in allergic patients: A comparison with the induction of anesthesia using midazolam-ketamine
    Kimura, K
    Adachi, M
    Kubo, K
    [J]. INFLAMMATION RESEARCH, 1999, 48 (11) : 582 - 587
  • [7] Histamine release during the induction of anesthesia with propofol in allergic patients: A comparison with the induction of anesthesia using midazolam-ketamine
    K. Kimura
    M. Adachi
    K. Kubo
    [J]. Inflammation Research, 1999, 48 : 582 - 587
  • [8] NO INHIBITION OF INTESTINAL MOTILITY AFTER KETAMINE MIDAZOLAM ANESTHESIA - A STUDY COMPARING THE EFFECTS AFTER ENFLURANE AND FENTANYL MIDAZOLAM
    FREYE, E
    KNUFERMANN, V
    [J]. ANAESTHESIST, 1994, 43 (02): : 87 - 91
  • [9] COMPARISON OF PSYCHOMOTOR-SKILLS AND AMNESIA AFTER INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA BY MIDAZOLAM OR THIOPENTAL
    REITAN, JA
    PORTER, RW
    BRAUNSTEIN, M
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1985, 64 (02): : 272 - 272
  • [10] COMPARISON OF PSYCHOMOTOR-SKILLS AND AMNESIA AFTER INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA WITH MIDAZOLAM OR THIOPENTAL
    REITAN, JA
    PORTER, W
    BRAUNSTEIN, M
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1986, 65 (09): : 933 - 937