Rating Level and Accuracy as a Function of Rater Personality

被引：25

作者：

Bernardin, H. John ^{[1
]}

Tyler, Catherine L. ^{[2
]}

Villanova, Peter ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Florida Atlantic Univ, Coll Business, Management Programs, Boca Raton, FL 33431 USA

[2] Oakland Univ, Management & Mkt Dept, Rochester, MI 48326 USA

[3] Appalachian State Univ, Walker Coll Business, Dept Management, Boone, NC 28608 USA

来源：

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT | 2009年 / 17卷 / 03期

关键词：

PERFORMANCE-APPRAISAL CONTEXT; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; SOCIAL-CONTEXT; ACCOUNTABILITY; CONSCIENTIOUSNESS; AGREEABLENESS; LENIENCY; SUBCOMPONENTS; CONSISTENCY; PREDICTION;

D O I：

10.1111/j.1468-2389.2009.00472.x

中图分类号：

B849 [应用心理学];

学科分类号：

040203 ;

摘要：

We investigated the predictability of rating level and two measures of rating accuracy from rater Agreeableness (A) and Conscientiousness (C) scores of the Five Factor Model. One hundred and twenty-six students made peer ratings after participating in several group exercises under conditions designed to emulate the modal peer rating system in which raters had low accountability for their ratings. Scores were correlated with average rating level (r=.18, p <.05) and both measures of rating accuracy (p <.05) and C scores were correlated with rating level (-.20, p <.05) and both measures of rating accuracy (p <.05). As suggested by Bernardin, Villanova, and Cooke (Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 232-236, 2000), raters who were both more agreeable and less conscientious made the most lenient and least accurate ratings. Contrary to Yun, Donahue, Dudley, and McFarland (International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13, 97-107, 2005), more agreeable raters also tended to rate the least effective performers more leniently than did other raters.

引用

下载

页码：300 / 310

页数：11

共 50 条

[1] Rater Rating-Level Bias and Accuracy in Performance Appraisals: The Impact OF Rater Personality, Performance Management Competence, and Rater Accountability
Bernardin, H. John
Thomason, Stephanie
Buckley, M. Ronald
Kane, Jeffrey S.
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2016, 55 (02) : 321 - 340
[2] RATER ERRORS AND RATING ACCURACY
MURPHY, KR
BALZER, WK
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 74 (04) : 619 - 624
[3] Direct Behavior Rating: Considerations for Rater Accuracy
Harrison, Sayward E.
Riley-Tillman, T. Chris
Chafouleas, Sandra M.
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 29 (01) : 3 - 20
[4] Effects of accountability on rating behavior and rater accuracy
Mero, NP
Motowidlo, SJ
Anna, AL
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 33 (12) : 2493 - 2514
[5] RATER BELIEFS ABOUT OTHERS - THEIR EFFECTS ON RATING ERRORS AND RATER ACCURACY
WEXLEY, KN
YOUTZ, MA
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 58 (04): : 265 - 275
[6] FORMAT AND TRAINING EFFECTS ON RATING ACCURACY AND RATER ERRORS
BORMAN, WC
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1979, 64 (04) : 410 - 421
[7] Discussion and consensus in rater groups: Implications for behavioral and rating accuracy
Roch, SG
HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 2006, 19 (02) : 91 - 115
[8] RATER TRAINING AND RATING ACCURACY - TRAINING FOR DIMENSIONAL ACCURACY VERSUS TRAINING FOR RATEE DIFFERENTIATION
STAMOULIS, DT
HAUENSTEIN, NMA
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 78 (06) : 994 - 1003
[9] Can performance-feedback accuracy be improved? Effects of rater priming and rating-scale format on rating accuracy
Jelley, RB
Goffin, RD
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 86 (01) : 134 - 144
[10] ACCURACY OF PERFORMANCE RATINGS AS AFFECTED BY RATER TRAINING AND PERCEIVED PURPOSE OF RATING
MCINTYRE, RM
SMITH, DE
HASSETT, CE
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1984, 69 (01) : 147 - 156

← 1 2 3 4 5 →