A macroeconomic evaluation of a carbon tax in overseas territories: A CGE model for Reunion Island

被引:18
|
作者
Sabine, Garabedian [1 ]
Avotra, Narindranjanahary [1 ]
Olivia, Ricci [1 ]
Sandrine, Selosse [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ La Reunion, CEMOI, 15 Ave Rene Cassin,BP 7151, F-97715 St Denis La Reunion, France
[2] PSL Res Univ, MINES ParisTech, CMA, Rue Claude Daunesse, F-06904 Sophia Antipolis, France
关键词
Energy transition; Computable general equilibrium model; Carbon tax; Reunion Island; Macroeconomic impacts;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111738
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Reunion Island, similar to most insular regions, is ruled by a carbon-based economy that is heavily dependent on fossil fuels. In recent years, the energy transition towards a low-carbon economy has become the watchword of this French overseas region, with the objective of a 100% renewable energy mix by 2030. Reducing fossil fuel use while maintaining economic growth is an important issue for all countries but is even more important for island territories with structural and geographical handicaps. Energy transition and drastic greenhouse gas emission reductions represent costs and opportunities that need to be quantified. This research paper assesses the environmental and macroeconomic effects of the carbon price policy introduced in France to meet the target of the Paris Agreement. The acceptability of the tax significantly depends on the possibility of recycling tax revenues. Different schemes for recycling tax revenues are considered in simulations. The methodology used is a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model for Reunion Island (GetRun-NRJ) that takes into account all island specificities. The results show that the carbon tax enables substitutions between fossil and renewable energy production and reduces CO2 emissions. However, the tax has negative effects on the aggregate economy. The implemented tax revenue recycling compensation mechanisms mitigate the negative impacts, but the results differ significantly, as the recycling schemes do not support the same economic actors.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Taxation of traditional rums in French overseas territories and public health: The example of Reunion Island
    Mete, D.
    [J]. REVUE D EPIDEMIOLOGIE ET DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2017, 65 (06): : 443 - 452
  • [2] Macroeconomic impact of natural disasters on a small island economy: evidence from a CGE model
    Narayan, PK
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2003, 10 (11) : 721 - 723
  • [3] Cap and Trade Versus Carbon Tax: An Analysis Based on a CGE Model
    Zhou, Jin-Feng
    Wu, Dan
    Chen, Wei
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 59 (02) : 853 - 885
  • [4] Cap and Trade Versus Carbon Tax: An Analysis Based on a CGE Model
    Jin-Feng Zhou
    Dan Wu
    Wei Chen
    [J]. Computational Economics, 2022, 59 : 853 - 885
  • [5] Will Australian Carbon Tax Affect the Resources Boom? Results from a CGE Model
    Meng X.
    [J]. Natural Resources Research, 2012, 21 (4) : 495 - 507
  • [6] Assessment of the potential impacts of a carbon tax in Chile using dynamic CGE model
    O'Ryan, Raul
    Nasirov, Shahriyar
    Osorio, Hector
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 403
  • [7] Assessing carbon tax using a CGE model with firm heterogeneity: An application to Vietnam
    Akkemik, K. Ali
    Borges, Jorge Tavares
    Dang, Phuong Thao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 365
  • [8] A factorial CGE model for analyzing the impacts of stepped carbon tax on Chinese economy and carbon emission
    Fu, Yupeng
    Huang, Guohe
    Liu, Lirong
    Zhai, Mengyu
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 759
  • [9] The Impact of Carbon Market and Carbon Tax on Green Growth Pathway in China: A Dynamic CGE Model Approach
    Bi, Huimin
    Xiao, Hao
    Sun, Kejuan
    [J]. EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2019, 55 (06) : 1312 - 1325
  • [10] Effects of an Energy Tax (Carbon Tax) on Energy Saving and Emission Reduction in Guangdong Province-Based on a CGE Model
    Chen, Wei
    Zhou, Jin-Feng
    Li, Shi-Yu
    Li, Yao-Chu
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (05)