Understanding Transit Agency Perceptions about Transportation Network Companies, Shared Mobility, and Autonomous Transit: Lessons from the United States

被引:4
|
作者
Han, Mengjie [1 ]
Dean, Matthew D. [2 ]
Maldonado, Pedro Adorno [3 ]
Masungi, Parfait [4 ]
Srinivasan, Sivaramakrishnan [3 ]
Steiner, Ruth L. [1 ]
Salzer, Kevin [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, Gainesville, FL USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Dept Engn Syst & Environm, Charlottesville, VA USA
[3] Univ Florida, Dept Civil & Coastal Engn, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[4] Univ Texas San Antonio, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, San Antonio, TX USA
[5] Jacksonville Transportat Author, Jacksonville, FL USA
关键词
Environmental technology;
D O I
10.1177/0361198119842121
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Emergent technologies like autonomous/connected vehicles and shared mobility platforms are anticipated to significantly affect various aspects of the transportation network such as safety, mobility, accessibility, environmental effects, and economics. Transit agencies play a critical role in this network by providing mobility to populations unable to drive or afford personal vehicles, and in some localities carry passengers more efficiently than other modes. As transit agencies plan for the future, uncertainty remains with how to best leverage new technologies. A survey completed by 50 transit agencies across the United States revealed similar yet different perceptions and preparations regarding transportation network companies (TNCs) and autonomous transit (AT) systems. Transit agencies believe TNC market share will grow, either minimally or rapidly (72%), within the next 5 years and have either a negative (43%) or positive (35%) impact on their transit system. Only 30% of agency boards instructed the agency to work with TNCs, despite no perceived transit union support. For AT systems, 22% of agencies are studying them, 64% believe the impacts of AT over the next 10-20 years will be positive, but fewer agencies are influenced to consider new technologies because of AT systems (38%) compared with TNCs (72%). Surprisingly, transit administration is mostly unsure about driver and transit unions' perceptions of these technologies. In addition, a significant number of transit agencies do not believe they should play a role in ensuring TNCs are safe and equitable and that TNCs should not have to adhere to the same regulations (50%, 28% respectively).
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 108
页数:14
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Integrating public transportation and shared autonomous mobility for equitable transit coverage: A cost-efficiency analysis
    Whitmore, Allante
    Samaras, Constantine
    Hendrickson, Chris T.
    Matthews, H. Scott
    Wong-Parodi, Gabrielle
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH INTERDISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVES, 2022, 14
  • [2] Do transportation network companies increase or decrease transit ridership? Empirical evidence from San Francisco
    Gregory D. Erhardt
    Richard Alexander Mucci
    Drew Cooper
    Bhargava Sana
    Mei Chen
    Joe Castiglione
    [J]. Transportation, 2022, 49 : 313 - 342
  • [3] Do transportation network companies increase or decrease transit ridership? Empirical evidence from San Francisco
    Erhardt, Gregory D.
    Mucci, Richard Alexander
    Cooper, Drew
    Sana, Bhargava
    Chen, Mei
    Castiglione, Joe
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION, 2022, 49 (02) : 313 - 342
  • [4] Understanding Links Between Transit Ridership and Gasoline Prices Evidence from the United States and Australia
    Currie, Graham
    Phung, Justin
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2008, (2063) : 133 - 142
  • [5] Wheeled Mobility Device Transportation Safety in Fixed Route and Demand-Responsive Public Transit Vehicles within the United States
    Frost, Karen L.
    van Roosmalen, Linda
    Bertocci, Gina
    Cross, Douglas J.
    [J]. ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 24 (02) : 87 - 101