Shade and wind barrier effects on summertime feedlot cattle performance

被引:0
|
作者
Mader, TL [1 ]
Dahlquist, JM
Hahn, GL
Gaughan, JB
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Dept Anim Sci, NE Res & Extens Ctr, Concord, NE USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Orr Res Ctr, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[3] USDA ARS, US Meat Anim Res Ctr, Clay Ctr, NE 68933 USA
[4] Univ Queensland, Sch Vet Sci & Anim Prod, Gatton Coll, Gatton, Qld 4345, Australia
关键词
feedlots; wind protection; steers; shade; summer; environment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
In each of three summertime trials conducted over consecutive years, approximately 110 predominantly black and black-white-face steers were blocked by weight and randomly allotted to one of 16 pens in a 2 x i factorial arrangement of treatments. Factors consisted of cattle being fed in facilities with or without wind barriers and with or without shade. Steers were fed dry-relied corn-based diets (1.43 Mcal/ kg, NEg). Mean starting date and days on feed were June 26 and 79, respectively. I;I unshaded areas, temperature and humidity averaged 21.6 degrees C and 77.9%, and the blackglobe-humidity index (BGHI) at 1500 averaged between 84.0 and 89.1. Each of four 6.1- x 6.1-m structures (mean height = 3.4 m) with white steel roofs provided shade (2.65 m(2)/steer) for two pens. In facilities with wind barriers provided, airflow was reduced from the north and northwest by a 25-m-wide shelterbelt containing six rows of trees. For cattle fed in pens with wind barriers, shade increased(P < .05) gain from 0 to 56 d and decreased (P < .05) DMI/ADG from 0 to 28 d. Differences (P < .05) in performance were not found between shaded and unshaded cattle in any portion of the feeding period for cattle fed in the pens without wind barriers and over the entire feeding period in either type of facility. The shade response in pens with wind barriers seemed to be greater the Ist yr than in subsequent years. Differences in weather patterns among years, especially air temperature, humidity, and solar radiation, may partially explain this interaction. Also, in yr I, cattle tended to have greater fat thickness at finish than in yr 2 and 3. Correlations between BGHI and DMI tended to be greater during the early portion of the trial(0 to 28 d) than over the entire trial. Correlations between the difference in BGHI under shade vs no shade and percentage of shade use had the greatest magnitude and were significant only in the first 28 d vs over the entire feeding period. Although no heat-related cattle deaths occurred in this study, results suggest that shade improves cattle performance in the summer when they are fed in facilities with winter wind protection available and have not become acclimated to hot conditions. Once cattle are acclimated or hot conditions subside, compensation by unshaded cattle offsets much of the initial benefits of providing shade.
引用
收藏
页码:2065 / 2072
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EVALUATING A NEW SHADE FOR FEEDLOT CATTLE PERFORMANCE AND HEAT STRESS
    Hayes, M. D.
    Brown-Brandl, T. M.
    Eigenberg, R. A.
    Kuehn, L. A.
    Thallman, R. M.
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2017, 60 (04) : 1301 - 1311
  • [2] EFFECTS OF WEATHER ON FEEDLOT CATTLE PERFORMANCE
    CRAWFORD, AW
    BUTCHER, JE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1966, 25 (02) : 596 - &
  • [3] The effects of shade on performance, carcass classes and behaviour of heat-stressed feedlot cattle at the finisher phase
    K. L. Blaine
    Ignatius Verla Nsahlai
    [J]. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2011, 43 : 609 - 615
  • [4] The effects of shade on performance, carcass classes and behaviour of heat-stressed feedlot cattle at the finisher phase
    Blaine, K. L.
    Nsahlai, Ignatius Verla
    [J]. TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2011, 43 (03) : 609 - 615
  • [5] Economically sustainable shade design for feedlot cattle
    Maia, Alex S. C.
    Moura, Gustavo A. B.
    Fonseca, Vinicius F. C.
    Gebremedhin, Kifle G.
    Milan, Hugo M.
    Neto, Marcos Chiquitelli
    Simao, Bruno R.
    Campanelli, Victor Paschoal Consentino
    Pacheco, Rodrigo Dias Lauritano
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2023, 10
  • [6] Effect of shade area on performance and welfare of short-fed feedlot cattle
    Sullivan, M. L.
    Cawdell-Smith, A. J.
    Mader, T. L.
    Gaughan, J. B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2011, 89 (09) : 2911 - 2925
  • [7] Shade and water misting effects on behavior, physiology, performance, and carcass traits of heat-stressed feedlot cattle
    Mitlöhner, FM
    Morrow, JL
    Dailey, JW
    Wilson, SC
    Galyean, ML
    Miller, MF
    McGlone, JJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2001, 79 (09) : 2327 - 2335
  • [8] EFFECTS OF FENBENDAZOLE AND IVERMECTIN ON PERFORMANCE OF FEEDLOT CATTLE
    MYERS, GH
    GRANT, RJ
    [J]. AGRI-PRACTICE, 1988, 9 (05): : 39 - &
  • [9] BENEFITS OF PROVIDING SHADE TO FEEDLOT CATTLE OF DIFFERENT BREEDS
    Brown-Brandl, T. M.
    Eigenberg, R. A.
    Nienaber, J. A.
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2013, 56 (04) : 1563 - 1570
  • [10] EFFECTS OF IONOPHORE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS ON PERFORMANCE OF FEEDLOT CATTLE
    MALCOLM, KJ
    BRANINE, ME
    GALYEAN, ML
    [J]. AGRI-PRACTICE, 1992, 13 (07): : 7 - &