Measuring quality of care and life in patients with an ocular prosthesis

被引:3
|
作者
Ruiters, Sebastien [1 ]
De Jong, Stephan [2 ]
Mombaerts, Ilse [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Ophthalmol, Herestr 49, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Ocular Prosthet Lab Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
Anophthalmia; Anophthalmic rehabilitation; Ocular prosthesis; Patient-related opinion; Quality of life; Orbital socket;
D O I
10.1007/s00417-021-05088-1
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose In patients with an anophthalmic condition, the primary determinants of success of ocular prosthetic rehabilitation are satisfaction with care and quality of life (QoL). The aim of this study is to develop a condition-specific questionnaire as a patient-reported outcome measure for patients with an ocular prosthesis. Methods Observational cross-sectional prospective study. We included 100 patients (52 female, 48 male, > 18 years old) with an anophthalmic and ocular prosthetic condition existing for 2 years or more. The patients completed a pre-tested 72-item questionnaire regarding their experience on living with an ocular prosthesis in four domains of QoL: single vision and care, wearing comfort, physical appearance and motility, and psychosocial functioning. Associations with demographic factors and condition- and prosthesis-related variables were investigated with multivariate analysis. The questionnaire was reduced with principal component analysis to obtain the Global Ocular Prosthesis Score (GOPS). Results Satisfaction scores for each QoL domain were high with a mean visual analogue score between 7.2 and 7.6. Patients were generally satisfied with the physical appearance of the artificial eye and reported adequate psychosocial functioning. Patients described the reduced peripheral visual field and socket discharge as chief complaints. The test was reduced to a 20-item questionnaire. The mean GOPS was 70.87 (median 75.00). Conclusions Patients with longstanding ocular prosthetic wear are satisfied with their physical appearance and report adequate psychosocial functioning. A concise 20-item questionnaire for the anophthalmic condition is a valuable tool to quantitatively measure patient-reported outcome of ocular prosthetic rehabilitation.
引用
收藏
页码:2017 / 2025
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measuring quality of care and life in patients with an ocular prosthesis
    Sébastien Ruiters
    Stéphan De Jong
    Ilse Mombaerts
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2021, 259 : 2017 - 2025
  • [2] Quality of life living with ocular prosthesis
    Goiato, Marcelo Coelho
    de Caxias, Fernanda Pereira
    dos Santos, Daniela Micheline
    EXPERT REVIEW OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 13 (04) : 187 - 189
  • [3] Measuring quality of care at the end of life
    Donaldson, MS
    Field, MJ
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 158 (02) : 121 - 128
  • [4] Measuring quality of life in palliative care
    Ferreira, Pedro Lopes
    Pinto, Ana Barros
    ACTA MEDICA PORTUGUESA, 2008, 21 (02): : 111 - 121
  • [5] MEASURING A PATIENTS QUALITY OF LIFE
    GILL, WM
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1984, 97 (756) : 329 - 330
  • [6] Measuring quality of life in economically disadvantaged acute and palliative care patients
    Allen-Burge, R
    Aldewereld, T
    Bolden, J
    Padgett, C
    Bailey, FA
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 2000, 16 (03) : 93 - 93
  • [7] Analysis of quality of life in patients with a facial prosthesis
    Klein, M.
    Menneking, H.
    Spring, A.
    Rose, M.
    ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY-HEIDELBERG, 2005, 9 (04): : 205 - 213
  • [8] MEASURING QUALITY-OF-LIFE IN PALLIATIVE CARE
    CELLA, DF
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 1995, 22 (02) : 73 - 81
  • [9] Measuring quality in end-of-life care
    Rosenfeld, K
    Wenger, NS
    CLINICS IN GERIATRIC MEDICINE, 2000, 16 (02) : 387 - +
  • [10] Measuring the Quality of End-of-Life Care
    Engelberg, Ruth A.
    Downey, Lois
    Wenrich, Marjorie D.
    Carline, Jan D.
    Silvestri, Gerard A.
    Dotolo, Danae
    Nielsen, Elizabeth L.
    Curtis, J. Randall
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2010, 39 (06) : 951 - 971