Estimating the Level of Susceptibility to Phytophthora infestans in Potato Genotypes

被引:51
|
作者
Yuen, Jonathan E. [1 ]
Forbes, Gregory A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Forest Mycol & Pathol, SE-75005 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Int Potato Ctr, Lima 12, Peru
关键词
QUANTITATIVE DISEASE RESISTANCE; LATE BLIGHT; PROGRESS CURVE; CULTIVARS; HOST; AREA;
D O I
10.1094/PHYTO-99-6-0782
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Resistance and susceptibility are closely related terms but differ in their underlying assumptions and measurement. Standardized methods for determining the level of resistance and susceptibility in potato to Phytophthora infestans, the causal agent of late blight, have traditionally been semiquantitative and are not based on a true interval scale, thus making their use in most mathematical and statistical operations inappropriate. Recently, researchers have attempted to develop interval scales using regression analysis of the direct or transformed area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC). In this article, a similar approach is described based on the relative AUDPC (RAUDPC) of one or two reference cultivars and tested using a data set of field trials involving cultivars with varying levels of susceptibility evaluated in different environments in several countries. The coefficient of variation (CV) among trials of the AUDPC was reduced when the RAUDPC was used and even more so when the RAUDPC was made relative to the RAUDPC of cv. Bintje (RaRAUDPC), which was present in all trials. The RaRAUDPC was used in regression models to estimate scale values for eight potato cultivars in 13 to 15 locations (depending on cultivar). The CVs of scale values measuring variation among sites were similar to those of the RaRAUDPC. Using two cultivars gave a slight improvement in CV, which was statistically significant. The scale developed here has ascending numbers for increasing susceptibility, is simple, and can be constructed as a ratio measure, which permitted the calculation of mean, variance, and CV.
引用
收藏
页码:782 / 786
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Susceptibility of immature and mature potato tubers to different genotypes of Phytophthora infestans
    Dangi, S.
    Kirk, W. W.
    Somohano, P.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2014, 104 (11) : 168 - 169
  • [2] Susceptibility of potato and other hosts to late blight caused by Canadian genotypes of Phytophthora infestans
    Peters, R. D.
    Platt, H. W.
    Beaton, B. W.
    Banks, C.
    Macdonald, I. K.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PHYTOPATHOLOGIE, 2012, 34 (02): : 342 - 343
  • [4] The influence of potato genotypes on the pathogenic features of Phytophthora infestans
    Zoteyeva, NM
    Zimnoch-Guzowska, E
    MIKOLOGIYA I FITOPATOLOGIYA, 2005, 39 (01): : 59 - 65
  • [5] Effect of immunomodulators on potato resistance and susceptibility to Phytophthora infestans
    O. L. Ozeretskovskaya
    N. I. Vasyukova
    Ya. S. Panina
    G. I. Chalenko
    Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2006, 53 : 488 - 494
  • [6] Effect of immunomodulators on potato resistance and susceptibility to Phytophthora infestans
    Ozeretskovskaya, O. L.
    Vasyukova, N. I.
    Panina, Ya. S.
    Chalenko, G. I.
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 53 (04) : 488 - 494
  • [7] Aggressiveness of Phytophthora Infestans Genotypes on Potato Stems and Leaves at Three Temperatures
    Jeffrey S. Miller
    Dennis A. Johnson
    American Journal of Potato Research, 2014, 91 : 538 - 553
  • [8] Aggressiveness of Phytophthora Infestans Genotypes on Potato Stems and Leaves at Three Temperatures
    Miller, Jeffrey S.
    Johnson, Dennis A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POTATO RESEARCH, 2014, 91 (05) : 538 - 553
  • [9] Reaction to Phytophthora infestans of potato genotypes with race-specific resistance
    Swiezynski, KM
    Domanski, L
    Sobkowiak, S
    Zarzycka, H
    POTATO RESEARCH, 1996, 39 (02) : 195 - 203
  • [10] EFFECTS OF PLANT NUTRITION ON SUSCEPTIBILITY OF POTATO LEAVES TO PHYTOPHTHORA-INFESTANS
    CARNEGIE, SF
    COLHOUN, J
    PHYTOPATHOLOGISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT-JOURNAL OF PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1983, 108 (3-4): : 242 - 250