Shared decision-making in advance care planning for persons with dementia in nursing homes: a cross-sectional study

被引:19
|
作者
Goossens, Bart [1 ]
Sevenants, Aline [1 ,2 ]
Declercq, Anja [1 ,3 ]
Van Audenhove, Chantal [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, LUCAS Ctr Care Res & Consultancy, Minderbroedersstr 8,Postal Box 5310, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Acad Ctr Gen Practice, Kapucijnenvoer 33j,Postal Box 7001, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Ctr Sociol Res, Parkstr 45,Postal Box 3601, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
关键词
Advance care planning; Communication; Dementia; Nursing; Nursing homes; Shared decision-making; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION; INVOLVE PATIENTS; OLDER-PEOPLE; OPTION SCALE; RESIDENTS; RECOMMENDATIONS; QUESTIONNAIRE; EXTENT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1186/s12877-020-01797-0
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background Shared decision-making provides an approach to discuss advance care planning in a participative and informed manner, embodying the principles of person-centered care. A number of guided approaches to achieve shared decision-making already exist, such as the three-talk model. However, it is uncertain whether daily practice methods in nursing home wards for persons with dementia comply with the underpinnings of this model. It is also uncertain whether professionals consider shared decision-making to be important in this context, and whether they perceive themselves sufficiently competent to practice this approach frequently. Methods The study has a cross-sectional design, with 65 wards (46 Belgian nursing homes) participating in the study. We compared nursing home professionals' and residents' perspectives on the level of shared decision-making during advance care planning conversations with ratings from external raters. Residents and professionals rated the level of shared decision-making by means of a questionnaire, which included the topic of the conversation. External raters assessed audio recordings of the conversations. Professionals filled in an additional self-report questionnaire on the importance of shared decision-making, their competence in practicing the approach, and with what frequency. Results At ward level, professionals and residents rated the average achieved level of shared decision-making 71.53/100 (sigma = 16.09) and 81.11/100 (sigma = 19.18) respectively. Meanwhile, raters gave average scores of 26.97/100 (sigma = 10.45). Only 23.8% of residents referred to advance care planning as the topic of the conversation. Professionals considered shared decision-making to be important (x=4.48/5, sigma = 0.26). This result contrasted significantly with the frequency (x=3.48/5, sigma = 0.51) and competence (x=3.76/5, sigma = 0.27) with which these skills were practiced (P < 0.001). Conclusions Residents with dementia are grateful when involved in discussing their care, but find it difficult to report what is discussed during these conversations. Receiving more information about advance care planning could provide them with the knowledge needed to prepare for such a conversation. External raters observe a discrepancy between the three-talk model and daily practice methods. Training programs should focus on providing professionals with better knowledge of and skills for shared decision-making. They should also promote team-based collaboration to increase the level of person-centered care in nursing home wards for persons with dementia.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Shared decision-making in advance care planning for persons with dementia in nursing homes: a cross-sectional study
    Bart Goossens
    Aline Sevenants
    Anja Declercq
    Chantal Van Audenhove
    [J]. BMC Geriatrics, 20
  • [2] Shared decision-making in maternity care in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study
    Alruwaili, Tahani Ali
    Crawford, Kimberley
    Fooladi, Ensieh
    [J]. MIDWIFERY, 2024, 138
  • [3] Perceptions of physicians, medical and nursing students concerning shared decision-making: a cross-sectional study
    Cantaert, Gabriel Rafael
    Van Hecke, Ann
    Smolderen, Kim
    [J]. ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2021, 76 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [4] Physicians’ perspective on shared decision-making in Dubai: a cross-sectional study
    Mohamad Alameddine
    Reem AlGurg
    Farah Otaki
    Alawi A. Alsheikh-Ali
    [J]. Human Resources for Health, 18
  • [5] Shared decision-making in physical therapy: a cross-sectional observational study
    Hausheer, Andrea Claudia
    Suter, Larissa Carolina
    Kool, Jan
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2021, 23 (06) : 368 - 376
  • [6] Physicians' perspective on shared decision-making in Dubai: a cross-sectional study
    Alameddine, Mohamad
    AlGurg, Reem
    Otaki, Farah
    Alsheikh-Ali, Alawi A.
    [J]. HUMAN RESOURCES FOR HEALTH, 2020, 18 (01)
  • [7] Shared decision-making in routine breast cancer care in Germany-A cross-sectional study
    Feiten, Stefan
    Scholl, Isabelle
    Duennebacke, Jan
    Schmidt, Marcus
    Franzen, Arno
    Ernst, Walter
    Spaderna, Heike
    Weide, Rudolf
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2022, 31 (07) : 1120 - 1126
  • [8] Improving shared decision-making in advance care planning: Implementation of a cluster randomized staff intervention in dementia care
    Goossens, Bart
    Sevenants, Aline
    Declercq, Anja
    Van Audenhove, Chantal
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2020, 103 (04) : 839 - 847
  • [9] Implementation of an Advance Care Planning Inventory and Its Possible Effect on Quality of Dying: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study in Group Homes for Persons with Dementia in Japan
    Takada, Seira
    Ogata, Yasuko
    Yumoto, Yoshie
    Ikeda, Masaomi
    [J]. HEALTHCARE, 2022, 10 (01):
  • [10] Incontinence care in nursing homes: a cross-sectional study
    Mandl, Manuela
    Halfens, Ruud J. G.
    Lohrmann, Christa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2015, 71 (09) : 2142 - 2152