Soil improvement of electroosmosis with the chemical treatment using the suitable operation process

被引:32
|
作者
Chien, Shao-Chi [1 ]
Teng, Fu-Chen [2 ]
Ou, Chang-Yu [3 ]
机构
[1] Aletheia Univ, New Taipei City 251, Taiwan
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[3] Natl Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Construct Engn, Taipei 106, Taiwan
关键词
Electroosmosis; Field test; Soil improvement; Suitable operation process; INJECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s11440-014-0319-y
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Previous studies show that improved soil strength is usually limited to regions near the anode or cathode in electroosmotic chemical treatments. Laboratory studies have shown that a suitable operation process strengthens soft clay for the entire specimen, from the anode to the cathode. The suitable operation process first injects a calcium chloride solution until the current decreases, and then injects a sodium silicate solution until there is no drain from the cathode during electroosmosis. A field test was carried out in this study to verify the suitable operation process and to assess the effectiveness of this treatment. The results indicate that the region of improvement was expanded from the anode to the cathode (except near the anode) by the suitable operation process and reveal homogeneous strength distributions over the region of improvement and an overall increase in strength. The largest cone resistance was near the cathode and measured 4,500 kPa, an increase in 300 %. A significant increase in cone resistance was also found near the middle, between the anode and cathode, and measured 3,700 kPa, which is an increase in 280 %. The average cone resistance and undrained shear strength from the anode to the cathode increased 125-130 %. The suitable operation process of electroosmosis chemical treatment is therefore proven to be effective in a field-scale test.
引用
收藏
页码:813 / 820
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Soil improvement of electroosmosis with the chemical treatment using the suitable operation process
    Shao-Chi Chien
    Fu-Chen Teng
    Chang-Yu Ou
    Acta Geotechnica, 2015, 10 : 813 - 820
  • [2] Development of a Suitable Operation Procedure for Electroosmotic Chemical Soil Improvement
    Ou, Chang-Yu
    Chien, Shao-Chi
    Lee, Tsung-Yeh
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 139 (06) : 993 - 1000
  • [3] Soil improvement using electroosmosis with the injection of chemical solutions: field tests
    Ou, Chang-Yu
    Chien, Shao-Chi
    Chang, Hsuan-Hsiang
    CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 46 (06) : 727 - 733
  • [4] Soil improvement using electroosmosis with the injection of chemical solutions: laboratory tests
    Chien, Shao-Chi
    Ou, Chang-Yu
    Wang, Yong-Hua
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERS, 2011, 34 (07) : 863 - 875
  • [5] Effect of zeta potential of clays on electroosmosis soil improvement
    Chien, SC
    Ou, CY
    Proceedings of the Twelfth Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Vol 1 and 2, 2003, : 151 - 154
  • [6] Soil improvement using electro-osmotic chemical treatment with harmonic waves
    Chien, S. C.
    Ou, Chang-Yu
    Teng, Fu-Chen
    GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOPHYSICAL SITE CHARACTERIZATION 4, VOLS I AND II, 2013, : 771 - 776
  • [7] A novel electroosmotic chemical treatment technique for soil improvement
    Chien, Shao-Chi
    Ou, Chang-Yu
    Lee, Ying-Chiang
    APPLIED CLAY SCIENCE, 2010, 50 (04) : 481 - 492
  • [8] DESIGN, OPERATION KEY ELEMENTS OF PROCESS CHEMICAL TREATMENT
    WITZIG, WL
    PIETRUSZKA, DJ
    ANEROUSIS, JP
    OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 1981, 79 (21) : 189 - 196
  • [9] Study on improvement of chemical furfural wastewater treatment process
    Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China
    不详
    Huagong Xiandai, 2008, 1 (65-68):
  • [10] Desalinization of Kaolin Soil Using Radial Electromigration and Electroosmosis
    Athmer, Christopher
    Ruef, Chris
    Jones, T. J.
    Wilkens, Robert J.
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS TOXIC AND RADIOACTIVE WASTE, 2013, 17 (01) : 16 - 20