Quantum correlation versus Bell-inequality violation under the amplitude damping channel

被引:9
|
作者
Ma, WenChao [1 ]
Xu, Shuai [1 ]
Shi, Jiadong [1 ]
Ye, Liu [1 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Univ, Sch Phys & Mat Sci, Hefei 230039, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Quantum dynamics; Bell's inequality violation; Amplitude damping; ENTANGLEMENT; DISENTANGLEMENT; ENTROPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.physleta.2015.09.013
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
We investigate the quantum correlations including quantum discord and entanglement under the amplitude damping channel. Our analysis results indicate that although the entanglement of initial state is degraded due to decoherence, the distribution trend of entanglement is not to be affected. Moreover, we find that the survival time for entanglement is much longer than for the Bell inequality violation, i.e., as time goes on the Bell inequality violation of final state may be not satisfied while the final state still remains entangled. Especially, although quantum entanglement and quantum discord all decrease under the amplitude damping channel, quantum discord (QD) is reduced significantly slower than entanglement. Therefore, the quantum discord is more robust against amplitude damping in comparison to entanglement measures. Furthermore, we also find that there are mixed states having quantum discord higher than that for pure states for a given degree of Bell's inequality violation. This means that the manipulation of nonclassical correlations via a pure state can result in a larger loss of quantum discord than that via a mixed state. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2802 / 2807
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Distribution of Bell-inequality violation versus multiparty-quantum-correlation measures
    Sharma, Kunal
    Das, Tamoghna
    Sen, Aditi
    Sen, Ujjwal
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2016, 93 (06)
  • [2] Bell-inequality violation with thermal radiation
    Filip, Radim
    Dušek, Miloslav
    Fiurášek, Jaromír
    Mišta, Ladislav
    Physical Review A. Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 2002, 65 (4 B): : 438021 - 438027
  • [3] Bell-inequality violation versus entanglement in the presence of local decoherence
    Kofman, A. G.
    Korotkov, A. N.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2008, 77 (05):
  • [4] Better Bell-inequality violation by collective measurements
    Liang, Yeong-Cherng
    Doherty, Andrew C.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2006, 73 (05):
  • [5] Complementarity between tripartite quantum correlation and bipartite Bell-inequality violation in three-qubit states
    Pandya, Palash
    Misra, Avijit
    Chakrabarty, Indranil
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2016, 94 (05)
  • [6] Bell-inequality violation and relativity of pre- and postselection
    Bacciagaluppi, G.
    Hermens, R.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2021, 104 (01)
  • [7] Experimental Bell-inequality violation without the postselection loophole
    Lima, G.
    Vallone, G.
    Chiuri, A.
    Cabello, Adan
    Mataloni, P.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2010, 81 (04):
  • [8] Optimal conditions for Bell-inequality violation in the presence of decoherence and errors
    Kofman, A. G.
    QUANTUM INFORMATION PROCESSING, 2012, 11 (01) : 269 - 309
  • [9] Bell-Inequality Violation with a Triggered Photon-Pair Source
    Young, R. J.
    Stevenson, R. M.
    Hudson, A. J.
    Nicoll, C. A.
    Ritchie, D. A.
    Shields, A. J.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2009, 102 (03)
  • [10] Optimal conditions for Bell-inequality violation in the presence of decoherence and errors
    A. G. Kofman
    Quantum Information Processing, 2012, 11 : 269 - 309