New method for evaluating winter air quality: PM2.5 assessment using Community Multi-Scale Air Quality Modeling (CMAQ) in Xi'an

被引:53
|
作者
Yang, Xiaochun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wu, Qizhong [1 ,3 ]
Zhao, Rong [2 ]
Cheng, Huaqiong [1 ,3 ]
He, Huijuan [4 ]
Ma, Qian [1 ,3 ]
Wang, Lanning [1 ,3 ]
Luo, Hui [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Coll Global Change & Earth Syst Sci, 19 XinJieKouWai St, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Xian Meteorol Bur, Xian 710016, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Normal Univ, Joint Ctr Global Change Studies, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[4] Shaanxi Remote Sensing Informat Ctr Agr, Xian 710016, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
PM10; PM2.5; CMAQ; Xi'an; Model assessment; EMISSION; SYSTEM; PERFORMANCE; FORECAST;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.04.019
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Particulate matter is the main air pollutant in China, especially in Xi'an in recent years. Since 2013, the WRF-SMOKE-CMAQ model system has been used to build an air quality model system for daily air quality forecasting in Xi'an. The emission inventory was built based on several anthropogenic emission inventories and open access emission datasets, and the model evaluation is presented to verify the emission inventory for particulate matter in Xi'an. Comparing the daily observed and simulated fine particulate (PM2.5) concentrations for four winters in different years (from 2014 to 2017), the model performs well in all studied time periods. The correlation coefficient of the simulated daily PM2.5 concentration data are all larger than 0.58, reaches 0.80 in 2016, and the fraction of predictions within a factor of two of observations (FAC2) are all above 66%. The differences of simulated results based on emission-unchanged system between 2014 and 2015 indicate that the slightly deteriorating air quality of 2015 is affected by the unfavorable air diffusion condition. The PM10 concentration increases from 95.9 mu g/m(3) to 110.3 mu g/m(3), and the PM2.5 from 82.4 mu g/m(3) to 95.4 mu g/m(3). According to the error analysis in model performance, the serious polluted situation of 2016 is mostly because of the sharp increased dust emissions. The emission-unchanged simulated particulate matter concentrations have little variation from 2015 to 2016, but the observation data increase obviously, that results in dramatically change of Mean Bias (MB). The absolute MB of PM10 increase from 70.3 mu g/m(3) to 135.2 mu g/m(3), and PM2.5 from 0.46 mu g/m(3) to 69.9 mu g/m(3). While the improved air quality in 2017 is attributed to both the better weather condition and the emission-reductions. The emission-unchanged simulated results decrease, and the absolute MB even have bigger decrease, that of the PM10 concentration reduce by 47 mu g/m(3), and PM2.5 by 37 mu g/m(3).
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 28
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Air quality forecast of PM10 in Beijing with Community Multi-scale Air Quality Modeling (CMAQ) system: emission and improvement
    Wu, Q.
    Xu, W.
    Shi, A.
    Li, Y.
    Zhao, X.
    Wang, Z.
    Li, J.
    Wang, L.
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 7 (05) : 2243 - 2259
  • [2] Community multi-scale air quality (CMAQ) modeling effort for pesticide emissions
    Lane, Timothy
    Sumner, Ann Louise
    Arnold, Joshua
    Grant, Shanique
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 252
  • [3] Air Quality Modeling via PM2.5 Measurements
    Zhou, Min
    Goh, Thong Ngee
    THEORY AND PRACTICE OF QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING IN ASIA INDUSTRY, 2017, : 197 - 210
  • [4] Contributions of Natural Emissions to Ozone and PM2.5 as Simulated by the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Model
    Mueller, Stephen F.
    Mallard, Jonathan W.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 45 (11) : 4817 - 4823
  • [5] Modeling ozone and aerosol formation and transport in the pacific northwest with the community multi-scale air quality (CMAQ) modeling system
    O'Neill, SM
    Lamb, BK
    Chen, J
    Claiborn, C
    Finn, D
    Otterson, S
    Figueroa, C
    Bowman, C
    Boyer, M
    Wilson, R
    Arnold, J
    Aalbers, S
    Stocum, J
    Swab, C
    Stoll, M
    Dubois, M
    Anderson, M
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 40 (04) : 1286 - 1299
  • [6] PM2.5 analog forecast and Kalman filter post-processing for the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model
    Djalalova, Irma
    Delle Monache, Luca
    Wilczak, James
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 108 : 76 - 87
  • [7] The Influence of Outdoor Particulate Matter PM2.5 on Indoor Air Quality: The Implementation of a New Assessment Method
    Bekierski, Dominik
    Kostyrko, Krystyna Barbara
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (19)
  • [8] Using the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model to estimate public health impacts of PM2.5 from individual power plants
    Buonocore, Jonathan J.
    Dong, Xinyi
    Spengler, John D.
    Fu, Joshua S.
    Levy, Jonathan I.
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 68 : 200 - 208
  • [9] One-atmosphere dynamics description in the Models-3 Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system
    Byun, DW
    AIR POLLUTION VII, 1999, 6 : 883 - 892
  • [10] Air quality PM2.5 prediction based on multi-model fusion
    Zhang, Bo
    Li, Xiaoli
    Zhao, Yanling
    Li, Yang
    Wang, Xinjian
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 31ST CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE (CCDC 2019), 2019, : 4426 - 4431