Performance of CARE rule in ruling out acute coronary syndrome in non-traumatic chest pain: an external validation study

被引:0
|
作者
Abbasian, Ahmad [1 ,2 ]
Farshidpour, Leyla [3 ]
Chegin, Mahdi [2 ]
Mirkarimi, Talayeh [4 ]
Doosti-Irani, Amin [5 ]
Mirfazaelian, Hadi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Prehosp & Hosp Emergency Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Emergency Med Dept, Imam Khomeini Hosp Complex, Tehran, Iran
[3] UC Davis Sch Med, Davis, CA USA
[4] Qazvin Univ Med Sci, Emergenc Med Dept, Qazvin, Iran
[5] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Dept Epidemiol, Sch Publ Hlth & Modeling, Noncommunicable Dis Rrs Ctr, Hamadan, Iran
来源
FRONTIERS IN EMERGENCY MEDICINE | 2022年 / 6卷 / 04期
关键词
CARE Rule; Chest Pain; Clinical Decision Rules; Major Adverse Cardiac Events; ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; HEART SCORE; DISCHARGE; RISK;
D O I
10.18502/fem.v6i4.10432
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: About one out of every 10 patients with chest pain in the emergency department (ED) are finally diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). A HEART score of center dot 3 has been shown to rule out ACS with a low risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) occurrence. It has been proposed that a negative CARE rule ( center dot 1), which stands for the first four elements of the HEART score and excludes the troponin assay requirement, may have similar rule-out reliability. This study aimed to externally validate the CARE rule. Methods: In this multicenter, observational study a convenience sample consisting of patients over the age of 15 who had at least one troponin study were included. The performance of the CARE rule at the cut-off center dot 1 for MACE prediction was assessed and compared to a HEART score of center dot 3 and physicians' gestalt. MACEwas defined as myocardial infarction, coronary angioplasty, coronary artery bypass graft, and all-cause mortality in 6 weeks. Results: The data of 154 patients was analyzed. Of these, 121 patients had a negative CARE score of center dot 1 and 33 individuals had a positive CARE score. Of those with a negative CARE score, only 1 (3%) experienced an adverse cardiac event while in those with a positive CARE score, 26 individuals (16.88 %) experienced MACE. The sensitivity of the CARE rule was 96.15% and the specificity was 25% with a negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.15. The indices for HEART score were 88%, 59.69%, and 0.2, respectively. In comparison, physicians' gestalt had a sensitivity of 96%, specificity of 49.22%, and a LR- of 0.08. Of note, utilizing the CARE rule with a cut-off of <3 showed sensitivity of 96%, specificity of 41.86%, and a LR- of 0.1. Conclusion: The CARE rule miss rate inMACE was more than 2% and while its performance was better than the HEART score, physicians' gestalt outperformed both rules for ruling outMACE.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reliability of the CARE rule and the HEART score to rule out an acute coronary syndrome in non-traumatic chest pain patients
    Thomas Moumneh
    Vanessa Richard-Jourjon
    Emilie Friou
    Fabrice Prunier
    Caroline Soulie-Chavignon
    Jacques Choukroun
    Betty Mazet-Guilaumé
    Jérémie Riou
    Andréa Penaloza
    Pierre-Marie Roy
    Internal and Emergency Medicine, 2018, 13 : 1111 - 1119
  • [2] Reliability of the CARE rule and the HEART score to rule out an acute coronary syndrome in non-traumatic chest pain patients
    Moumneh, Thomas
    Richard-Jourjon, Vanessa
    Friou, Emilie
    Prunier, Fabrice
    Soulie-Chavignon, Caroline
    Choukroun, Jacques
    Mazet-Guilaume, Betty
    Riou, Jeremie
    Penaloza, Andrea
    Roy, Pierre-Marie
    INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 13 (07) : 1111 - 1119
  • [3] Diagnostic performance of reproducible chest wall tenderness to rule out acute coronary syndrome in acute chest pain: a prospective diagnostic study
    Graeni, Christoph
    Senn, Oliver
    Bischof, Manuel
    Cippa, Pietro E.
    Hauffe, Till
    Zimmerli, Lukas
    Battegay, Edouard
    Franzen, Daniel
    BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (01):
  • [4] A new simple clinical risk score for ruling out acute coronary syndrome. The Florence chest pain rule
    Conti, A.
    Vanni, S.
    Del Taglia, B.
    Raveggi, S.
    Sammicheli, L.
    Luise, F.
    Pieralli, F.
    Camaiti, A.
    Moroni, F.
    Nozzoli, C.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2008, 29 : 662 - 662
  • [5] Telephone triage of chest pain in out-of-hours primary care: external validation of a symptom-based prediction rule to rule out acute coronary syndromes
    Manten, Amy
    Harskamp, Ralf E.
    Busschers, Wim B.
    van Charante, Eric P. Moll
    Himmelreich, Jelle C. L.
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2024, 41 (05) : 832 - 840
  • [6] Ruling out coronary heart disease in primary care: external validation of a clinical prediction rule
    Djasmo, Dewi
    Echteld, Michael
    Spee, Leo
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2012, 62 (602): : 460 - 460
  • [7] Ruling out coronary heart disease in primary care: external validation of a clinical prediction rule
    Haasenritter, Joerg
    Boesner, Stefan
    Vaucher, Paul
    Herzig, Lilli
    Heinzel-Gutenbrunner, Monika
    Baum, Erika
    Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2012, 62 (599):
  • [8] Coronary artery calcium scoring for ruling-out acute coronary syndrome in chest pain CT
    Hinzpeter, Ricarda
    Higashigaito, Kai
    Morsbach, Fabian
    Benz, David
    Alkadhi, Hatem
    Manka, Robert
    Seifert, Burkhardt
    Keller, Dagmar I.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 35 (10): : 1565 - 1567
  • [9] Chest Pain in Primary Care: A Systematic Review of Risk Stratification Tools to Rule Out Acute Coronary Syndrome
    van den Bulk, Simone
    Manten, Amy
    Bonten, Tobias N.
    Harskamp, Ralf E.
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2024, 22 (05) : 426 - 436
  • [10] Imaging of non-cardiac, non-traumatic causes of acute chest pain
    Kienzl, Daniela
    Prosch, Helmut
    Toepker, Michael
    Herold, Christian
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 81 (12) : 3669 - 3674