Estimating sampling errors in large-scale temperature averages

被引:1
|
作者
Jones, PD
Osborn, TJ
Briffa, KR
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1175/1520-0442(1997)010<2548:ESEILS>2.0.CO;2
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
A method is developed for estimating the uncertainty (standard error) of observed regional, hemispheric, and global-mean surface temperature series due to incomplete spatial sampling. Standard errors estimated at the grid-box level [SE2 = S-2(1 - (r) over bar)(1 + (n - 1)(r) over bar)] depend upon three parameters: the number of site records (n) within each box, the average interrecord correlation ((r) over bar) between these sites, and the temporal variability (S-2) of each grid-box temperature time series. For boxes without data (n = 0), estimates are made using values of S-2 interpolated from neighboring grid boxes. Due to spatial correlation, large-scale standard errors in a regional-mean time series are not simply the average of the grid-box standard errors, but depend upon the effective number of independent sites (N-eff) over the region. A number of assumptions must be made in estimating the various parameters, and these are tested with observational data and complementary results from multicentury control integrations of three coupled general circulation models (GCMs). The globally complete GCMs enable some assumptions to be tested in a situation where there are no missing data; comparison of parameters computed from the observed and model datasets are also useful for assessing the performance of GCMs. As most of the parameters are timescale dependent, the resulting errors are likewise timescale dependent and must be calculated for each timescale of interest. The length of the observed record enables uncertainties to be estimated on the interannual and interdecadal timescales, with the longer GCM runs providing inferences about longer timescales. For mean annual observed data on the interannual timescale, the 95% confidence interval for estimates of the global-mean surface temperature since 1951 is +/-0.12 degrees C. Prior to 1900, the confidence interval widens to +/-0.18 degrees C. Equivalent values on the decadal timescale are smaller: +/-0.10 degrees C (1951-95) and +/-0.16 degrees C (1851-1900).
引用
收藏
页码:2548 / 2568
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] LARGE-SCALE MULTIPURPOSE SURVEY SAMPLING ERRORS
    KISH, L
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1972, 28 (04) : 1172 - 1173
  • [2] Measurement, Sampling, and Equating Errors in Large-Scale Assessments
    Exposito Casas, Eva
    [J]. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE PEDAGOGIA, 2014, 72 (259): : 585 - 586
  • [3] Estimating chemical errors in large-scale simulations of aircraft emissions
    Tsai, FJ
    Walcek, CJ
    [J]. TERRESTRIAL ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC SCIENCES, 2001, 12 (01): : 79 - 108
  • [4] SAKE: Estimating Katz Centrality Based on Sampling for Large-Scale Social Networks
    Lin, Mingkai
    Li, Wenzhong
    Song, Lynda J.
    Nguyen, Cam-Tu
    Wang, Xiaoliang
    Lu, Sanglu
    [J]. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY FROM DATA, 2021, 15 (04)
  • [5] ERRORS IN LARGE-SCALE SHOREBIRD COUNTS
    RAPPOLDT, C
    KERSTEN, M
    SMIT, C
    [J]. ARDEA, 1985, 73 (01) : 13 - 24
  • [6] Responding to Large-Scale Testing Errors
    Valenstein, Paul N.
    Alpern, Ann
    Keren, David F.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2010, 133 (03) : 440 - 446
  • [8] AEROSOL FRACTIONATOR FOR LARGE-SCALE SAMPLING
    FORNEY, LJ
    [J]. REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1976, 47 (10): : 1264 - 1269
  • [9] LARGE-SCALE PHOTO SAMPLING WORKSHOP
    KIRBY, CL
    [J]. FORESTRY CHRONICLE, 1970, 46 (05): : 360 - &
  • [10] ESTIMATING ADVANTAGES TO LARGE-SCALE ADVERTISING
    BROWN, RS
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1978, 60 (03) : 428 - 437