Moral intuitions versus game theory: A response to Marcoux on resume embellishing

Marcoux argues that job candidates ought to embellish non-verifiable information on their resumes because it is the best way to coordinate collective action in the resume game'. I do not dispute his analysis of collective action; I look at the larger picture, which throws light on the role game theory might play in ethics. I conclude that game theory's conclusions have nothing directly to do with ethics. Game theory suggests the means to certain ends, but the ethics of both the means and ends must be assessed separately before any ethical recommendation can be made. Marcoux makes several highly disputable assumptions in order to fit resumes into game theory; his analysis does not take into account the consequences that embellishing has beyond the submission and assessment of resumes; his argument depends on his claim that a resume system in which everyone embellishes is attainable; and finally, his argument relies on an idealization of human motivation, rather than abstraction. I conclude that candidates should never embellish their resumes.