Surface storage in furrow irrigation evaluation

被引:7
|
作者
Renault, D
Wallender, WW
机构
[1] ECOLE NATL GENIE RURAL EAUX & FORETS, F-34033 MONTPELLIER, FRANCE
[2] UNIV CALIF DAVIS, DEPT LAND AIR & WATER RESOURCES, DAVIS, CA 95616 USA
[3] UNIV CALIF DAVIS, DEPT AGR ENGN, DAVIS, CA 95616 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1997)123:6(415)
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Assessment of the surface storage is of great importance in hydrological surface irrigation. For the Horton infiltration law used in the ALIVE model (Advanced LInear VElocity), an accurate measurement of surface storage is the key to successfully predicting infiltration. For the Kostiakov function, the conclusion is paradoxical due to the fact that this law systematically underpredicts infiltration for times greater than the time used for fitting. Measuring surface storage accurately is cumbersome, and, consequently, most of the models use empirical formulas, which are reasonable, if not always precise. The constant mean cross-section assumption that is implied in hydrological models is discussed from a practical point of view. A representation of nonuniform storage distribution is presented through the ALIVE approach, and the feasibility of an inverse solution is discussed. Finally field records and numerical tests indicate that if the variation of the cross-section remains low (less than half or double the mean) and is randomly distributed the constant mean cross-section assumption is acceptable. With large variations in the flow cross section, the error is lumped with variation in infiltration characteristics. Low variations that are not randomly distributed can affect the infiltration evaluation process. Models using the Kostiakov function are much more sensitive to this phenomenon than the ALIVE model, which uses the Horton law. The reason is likely that the ALIVE model is based on the analysis of the advance rate as a function of distance x'(x) rather than advance time at given location t(a)(x).
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 422
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Surface storage in furrow irrigation evaluation
    [J]. J Irrig Drain Eng, 6 (415-422):
  • [2] Surface water storage independent equation for predicting furrow irrigation advance
    John D. Valiantzas
    [J]. Irrigation Science, 2000, 19 : 115 - 123
  • [3] Surface water storage independent equation for predicting furrow irrigation advance
    Valiantzas, JD
    [J]. IRRIGATION SCIENCE, 2000, 19 (03) : 115 - 123
  • [4] Field evaluation of furrow irrigation models
    Esfandiari, M
    Maheshwari, BL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2001, 79 (04): : 459 - 479
  • [5] SUBSURFACE AND FURROW IRRIGATION EVALUATION FOR BEAN PRODUCTION
    SEPASKHAH, AR
    SICHANI, SA
    BAHRANI, B
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 1976, 19 (06): : 1089 - &
  • [6] Accounting for soil variability in the evaluation of furrow irrigation
    Oyonarte, NA
    Mateos, L
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 2003, 46 (01): : 85 - 94
  • [7] AN EVALUATION OF TRICKLE VS FURROW IRRIGATION OF HOPS
    FARRAR, SL
    WAMPLE, RL
    [J]. HORTSCIENCE, 1982, 17 (01) : 27 - 27
  • [8] EFFECTS OF EVERY FURROW VS. EVERY OTHER FURROW SURFACE IRRIGATION IN COTTON
    Subramani, J.
    Martin, E. C.
    [J]. APPLIED ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE, 2012, 28 (01) : 39 - 42
  • [9] Evaluation of furrow irrigation practices in Fergana Valley of Uzbekistan
    Reddy, J. Mohan
    Jumaboev, K.
    Matyakubov, B.
    Eshmuratov, D.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2013, 117 : 133 - 144
  • [10] EVALUATION OF FERTIGATION IN DIFFERENT SOILS AND FURROW IRRIGATION REGIMES
    Abbasi, Fariborz
    Rezaee, Heidar Taifeh
    Jolaini, Mohammad
    Alizadeh, Hamzeh Ali
    [J]. IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE, 2012, 61 (04) : 533 - 541