Piloting a web-based systematic collection and reporting of patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures in chronic heart failure

被引:12
|
作者
Pennucci, Francesca [1 ]
De Rosis, Sabina [1 ]
Passino, Claudio [2 ]
机构
[1] Scuola Super Sant Anna, Inst Management, Lab Management & Sanita, Pisa, PI, Italy
[2] Fdn Toscana Gabriele Monasterio Ric Med & Sanita, UOC Cardiol & Med Cardiovasc, Pisa, Italy
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2020年 / 10卷 / 10期
关键词
patient-reported measures; chronic heart failure; healthcare management; value-based; performance evaluation; HEALTH-CARE; QUALITY; VERSION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037754
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate the feasibility of a digital and continuous collection and reporting of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) for chronic heart failure (CHF). Design A single-site pilot study was settled for evaluating the feasibility of the intervention, both using qualitative and quantitative data (ie, workshop, surveys). Setting The pilot has been implemented in a Tuscan specialised hospital (Italy). Participants 162 patients were involved. Inclusion criteria were: a previous diagnosis of HF, age >= 18 years, absence of cognitive impairment or active tumours, ability to provide informed consent to study participation. Intervention The continuous collection and reporting of PROMs and PREMs has been designed and implemented in 2018. PREMs questionnaires for patients were developed, while Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 was used for assessing PROMs. Questionnaires are administered at specific time points: discharge; 30 days, 7 and 12 months after the discharge. Enrolment of patients, administration and real-time reporting of questionnaires are carried on through a digital platform. Outcome measures Enrolment, response and drop-out rates were considered to assess the feasibility of the intervention. Qualitative data were collected during meetings and workshops with health workers. The representativeness of the recruited sample with respect to the population characteristics was also evaluated. Results The system has been successfully implemented during 2018. Response rates have been consistently above 50%, demonstrating patients' transversal willingness to participate. All the involved stakeholders acknowledged the feasibility of the design. The recruited sample is significantly different in terms of age and educational level compared with the overall population characteristics. Conclusion It is possible to run a web-based systematic collection and reporting system for CHF patient-reported data. Systematic collection and reporting of PROMs and PREMs data allows professionals to increasingly assume CHF patient perspective in their daily work. Limitations will be used to improve the system.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Using patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures to elevate the quality of healthcare
    Casaca, Pedro
    Schafer, Willemijn
    Nunes, Ana Beatriz
    Sousa, Paulo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2023, 35 (04)
  • [2] Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures in melanoma clinical quality registries: a systematic review
    Blood, Zachary
    Anh Tran
    Caleo, Lauren
    Saw, Robyn
    Dieng, Mbathio
    Shackleton, Mark
    Soyer, H. Peter
    Arnold, Chris
    Mann, Graham J.
    Morton, Rachael L.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (02):
  • [3] Quantifying the patient experience with patient-reported outcome measures
    Lapin, Brittany
    Bautista, Joceyln
    Bae, Charles
    Katzan, Irene
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (01) : 98 - 98
  • [4] Patient-reported outcome measures
    Ribeiro, Bernard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2007, 100 (09) : 397 - 397
  • [5] Piloting patient-reported outcome measures for evaluation of the Irish Chronic Disease Programme
    Cosgrave, Ellen Juliet
    O'Brien, S.
    O'Brien, M.
    Hurley, L.
    Drummond, L.
    Gleeson, M.
    O'Keeffe, D.
    O'Reilly, O.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 33
  • [6] Exploring the profile of baseline patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures in an outpatient oncology setting
    Webber, Kate
    Cook, Olivia
    White, Michelle
    Kwok, Alastair
    Segelov, Eva
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 16 : 200 - 201
  • [7] Patient-Reported Outcomes (Pros) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (Proms)
    Weldring, Theresa
    Smith, Sheree M. S.
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES INSIGHTS, 2013, 6 : 61 - 68
  • [8] PROMsBase: Web-based repository portal for patient-reported outcome measures in orthopaedics
    Tirosh, Oren
    Phong Tran
    Renouf, Jesse
    Pergaminelis, Nicholas
    Purdie, Christa Noelle
    Ho, Andy
    Gibbens, Amy
    [J]. HEALTH INFORMATICS JOURNAL, 2019, 25 (03) : 867 - 877
  • [9] Patient experience with patient-reported outcome measures in neurologic practice
    Lapin, Brittany
    Udeh, Belinda
    Bautista, Jocelyn F.
    Katzan, Irene L.
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2018, 91 (12) : E1135 - E1151
  • [10] Patient-reported experience with patient-reported outcome measures in adult patients seen in rheumatology clinics
    Lapin, Brittany R.
    Honomichl, Ryan
    Thompson, Nicolas
    Rose, Susannah
    Abelson, Abby
    Deal, Chad
    Katzan, Irene L.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (04) : 1073 - 1082