Corneal biomechanical properties after LASIK, ReLEx flex, and ReLEx smile by Scheimpflug-based dynamic tonometry

被引:99
|
作者
Pedersen, Iben Bach [1 ]
Bak-Nielsen, Sashia [1 ]
Vestergaard, Anders Hojslet [2 ]
Ivarsen, Anders [1 ]
Hjortdal, Jesper [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[2] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark
关键词
Myopia; Biomechanics; Laser In Situ Keratomileusis; Corneal Stroma; Corvis ST; Ocular Response Analyzer; IN-SITU KERATOMILEUSIS; IATROGENIC KERATECTASIA; LENTICULE EXTRACTION; FEMTOSECOND LASER; ECTASIA; MODEL; DIOPTERS; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s00417-014-2667-6
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
To evaluate corneal biomechanical properties after LASIK, ReLEx flex, and the flap-free procedure ReLEx smile by Scheimpflug-based dynamic tonometry (Corvis ST) and non-contact differential tonometry (Ocular Response Analyzer, ORA). Patients treated for high myopia (-10.5 to -5.5 diopters, spherical equivalent refraction) more than one year previously at Aarhus University Hospital were included. Treatments comprised LASIK (35 eyes), ReLEx flex (31 eyes), and ReLEx smile (29 eyes). A control group included 31 healthy eyes. Cornea-compensated IOP (IOPcc), corneal hysteresis (CH), and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were measured with ORA. Corneal applanation and deformation were registered with Corvis ST during an air-pulse. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that CH and CRF were significantly lower after all keratorefractive procedures compared to healthy controls (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in CH or CRF between the keratorefractive groups. Corvis ST showed no differences in radius at highest concavity (HC radius), time until first applanation (A1 Time), time until second applanation (A2 Time), and deflection length at highest concavity (HC deflection length) between groups. LASIK treated eyes had significantly shorter time until highest concavity than eyes treated with ReLEx smile (HC Time, p = 0.01). The A1 deflection length was significantly shorter in the keratorefractive groups compared to the healthy controls (p < 0.05). Keratorefrative procedures alter the corneal biomechanical properties with regard to corneal hysteresis and corneal resistant factor. The flap-based LASIK and ReLEx flex and the flap-free ReLEx smile result in similar reduction in corneal biomechanics when evaluated by Corvis ST and ORA.
引用
收藏
页码:1329 / 1335
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Corneal biomechanical properties after LASIK, ReLEx flex, and ReLEx smile by Scheimpflug-based dynamic tonometry
    Iben Bach Pedersen
    Sashia Bak-Nielsen
    Anders Højslet Vestergaard
    Anders Ivarsen
    Jesper Hjortdal
    [J]. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2014, 252 : 1329 - 1335
  • [2] Comparing the Corneal Biomechanical Stability after LASIK, ReLEx FLEx and ReLEx SMILE with Ultra High Speed Camera (Corvis® ST)
    Pedersen, Iben Bach
    Bak-Nielsen, Sashia
    Ivarsen, Anders
    Hjortdal, Jesper
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (15)
  • [3] Corneal Thickness After SMILE Affects Scheimpflug-based Dynamic Tonometry
    Fernandez, Joaquin
    Rodriguez-Vallejo, Manuel
    Martinez, Javier
    Tauste, Ana
    Pinero, David P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 32 (12) : 821 - +
  • [4] Comparison of corneal sensitivity between FS-LASIK and femtosecond lenticule extraction (ReLEx flex) or small-incision lenticule extraction (ReLEx smile) for myopic eyes
    Wei, Shengsheng
    Wang, Yan
    [J]. GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 251 (06) : 1645 - 1654
  • [5] Comparison of corneal sensitivity between FS-LASIK and femtosecond lenticule extraction (ReLEx flex) or small-incision lenticule extraction (ReLEx smile) for myopic eyes
    Shengsheng Wei
    Yan Wang
    [J]. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2013, 251 : 1645 - 1654
  • [6] Erratum to: Comparison of corneal sensitivity between FS-LASIK and femtosecond lenticule extraction (ReLEx flex) or small-incision lenticule extraction (ReLEx smile) for myopic eyes
    Shengsheng Wei
    Yan Wang
    [J]. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2013, 251 : 2495 - 2497
  • [7] Quality of life after refractive surgery: ReLEx SMILE vs Femto-LASIK
    Klokova, Olga Aleksandrovna
    Sergeevna, Sergey Nikolaevich Sakhnov Maria
    Damashauskas, Geydenrikh Roman Olegovich
    [J]. CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 13 : 561 - 570
  • [8] Comparison of corneal sensitivity between FS-LASIK and femtosecond lenticule extraction (ReLEx flex) or small-incision lenticule extraction (ReLEx smile) for myopic eyes (vol 251, pg 1645, 2013)
    Wei, Shengsheng
    Wang, Yan
    [J]. GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 251 (10) : 2495 - 2497
  • [9] Optical Quality and Visual Performance after Relex SMILE, LASIK or PRK Refractive Surgery Procedures for Myopia
    Bharadwaj, Shrikant R.
    Sarkar, Samrat
    Reddy, Jagadesh
    Vadavalli, Pravin Krishna
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2016, 57 (12)
  • [10] Corneal biomechanical properties after SMILE versus FLEX, LASIK, LASEK, or PRK: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hui Guo
    Seyed M. Hosseini-Moghaddam
    William Hodge
    [J]. BMC Ophthalmology, 19