Purchasing protection? The effect of political spending on US trade policy

被引:32
|
作者
Drope, JM [1 ]
Hansen, WL [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/106591290405700103
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
dThe issue of whether or not money influences policymaking has been widely debated in American politics. While a direct link between money and policy outcomes has proven difficult to make, bureaucratic decisions on trade protection provide an opportunity to link politically active firms and industries to policy outcomes. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) and the U.S. Department of Commerce both play a major role in making trade policy by administering several important trade laws, including the U.S. antidumping law. Firms can petition the ITC and Commerce for protection from foreign firms that are alleged to engage in the unfair practice of dumping their goods on the U.S. market. Evidence suggests, however, that firms use this law as a means of seeking protection from foreign competition, even when that competition is fair. As the stakes are high for both domestic and foreign firms, there is the potential for political influence. Focusing on lobbying activities and campaign contributions, we analyze the influence of domestic and foreign monies on bureaucratic decision making on trade policy.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 37
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] US TRADE POLICY - NEW POLITICAL DIMENSIONS
    DIEBOLD, W
    [J]. FOREIGN AFFAIRS, 1974, 52 (03) : 472 - 496
  • [2] GLOBALIZATION AND ECONOMY PROTECTION IN THE US TRADE POLICY DEVELOPMENT
    Neumann, Pavel
    [J]. GLOBALIZATION AND ITS SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES, 2018, : 269 - 275
  • [3] The Political Economic Analysis of US Trade and Investment Policy
    Gao Guowei
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN SOCIAL SCIENCE, HUMANITIES, AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 43 : 792 - 796
  • [4] Political Economy of US Trade Policy towards China
    Bibo Liang
    [J]. China & World Economy, 2007, (05) : 50 - 64
  • [5] Political economy of US trade policy towards China
    Liang, Bibo
    [J]. CHINA & WORLD ECONOMY, 2007, 15 (05) : 50 - 64
  • [6] US Ethanol Trade Policy: Pollution Reduction or Domestic Protection
    Devadoss, Stephen
    Bayham, Jude
    [J]. REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 21 (03) : 568 - 584
  • [7] Purchasing Power: US Overseas Defense Spending and Military Statecraft
    Blankenship, Brian
    Miles Joyce, Renanah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, 2020, 64 (2-3) : 545 - 573
  • [8] TRADE POLICY IN THE ASPECT OF TRADE CREDIT IN GROUP PURCHASING ORGANIZATIONS
    Zimon, G.
    Ostrowska-Dankiewicz, A.
    Dankiewicz, R.
    Baranovska, V
    Zelenitsa, I
    [J]. FINANCIAL AND CREDIT ACTIVITY-PROBLEMS OF THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2019, 1 (28): : 139 - 148
  • [9] An empirical analysis of the determinants of trade policy protection in the US manufacturing sector
    Metcalfe, MR
    Goodwin, BK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLICY MODELING, 1999, 21 (02) : 153 - 165
  • [10] Trade Liberalisation and Capital Spending by US Manufacturers
    Liebman, Benjamin H.
    Reynolds, Kara M.
    [J]. WORLD ECONOMY, 2015, 38 (11): : 1763 - 1780