PNW Seaport Alliance: Stakeholder's benefits of port cooperation

被引:13
|
作者
Yoshitani, Tay [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Port Seattle, Seattle, WA 98121 USA
[2] Port Oakland, Oakland, CA 94607 USA
[3] Port Baltimore, Baltimore, MD 21202 USA
[4] Port Los Angeles, San Pedro, CA 90733 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.rtbm.2018.02.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The introduction of containerization in the 1970's was a classic disruptive change to an industry that was ripe for innovation and standardization. It facilitated the growth of seaborne trade and landside movement of cargo via rail and trucks. But it also became increasingly difficult to differentiate services throughout the supply chain. In response, every segment of the container supply chain sought to rationalize by merging and forming strategic alliances. However, ports have been the one notable exception. While most ports remain unique because of location; changes in demographics, trade patterns, and other external factors are causing the overlap of service areas for some neighboring ports. Such was the case for the Ports of Seattle and Tacoma located just 30 miles from each other. This paper outlines the background and circumstances that made the ultimate formation of the PNW Seaport Alliance so compelling. It also summarizes the key components of the Alliance. Since each situation between neighboring ports is unique, a standard template for assessing feasibility would not be practical. However, it is hoped that sharing the experiences of these two ports forming an Alliance would be of interest and help for many ports in the world facing similar circumstances.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 17
页数:4
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Cooperation Performance Evaluation between Seaport and Dry Port; Case of Qingdao Port and Xi'an Port
    Li, Jian
    Jiang, Bao
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF E-NAVIGATION AND MARITIME ECONOMY, 2014, 1 : 99 - 109
  • [2] REPUTATION FOR COOPERATION: CONTINGENT BENEFITS IN ALLIANCE ACTIVITY
    Arend, Richard J.
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2009, 30 (04) : 371 - 385
  • [3] Societal costs and benefits of cooperation between port authorities
    Wortelboer-Van Donselaar, Pauline
    Kolkman, Joost
    [J]. MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT, 2010, 37 (03) : 271 - 284
  • [4] Quantifying the Operational Benefits of Dry Port Integrated Cooperation in Port Clusters: A Microsimulation Study
    Yildirim, Mehmet Sinan
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (06)
  • [5] Our perspective on the alliance program's benefits
    Crawford, D
    McCoy, D
    Nowak, D
    [J]. COMPUTING IN SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2000, 2 (02) : 77 - 79
  • [6] Effect of Stakeholder's Mutual Cooperation in Sustainable Tourism Marketing
    Choi, Kwang-Woong
    Hwang, Yong-Cheol
    [J]. 2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS (ICBE2017), 2017, : 295 - 295
  • [7] Model of Container Port's Alliance Under the Perspective of Cooperative Game
    Xia, Xin-hai
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL ASIA CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT INNOVATION: CORE THEORY AND APPLICATIONS OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, VOL 1, 2016, : 137 - 146
  • [8] MODELING CHINA'S DRY PORT COOPERATION IN SUPPLY CHAINS
    Plotnikov, Egor
    Rakhmangulov, Aleksandr
    [J]. TRANSPORT PROBLEMS, 2021, 16 (03) : 89 - 103
  • [9] Stakeholder Perspective The Lessons from Delaware's Employee Benefits Program
    Vogenberg, F. Randy
    [J]. AMERICAN HEALTH AND DRUG BENEFITS, 2008, 1 (07): : 15 - 16
  • [10] Identifying Ecosystem-Based Alternatives for the Design of a Seaport's Marine Infrastructure: The Case of Tema Port Expansion in Ghana
    de Boer, Wiebe P.
    Slinger, Jill H.
    Kangeri, Arno K. Wa
    Vreugdenhil, Heleen S. I.
    Taneja, Poonam
    Addo, Kwasi Appeaning
    Vellinga, Tiedo
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (23)