Review of computerized clinical decision support in community pharmacy

被引:40
|
作者
Curtain, C. [1 ,2 ]
Peterson, G. M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Sch Med, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Unit Medicat Outcomes Res & Educ, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
关键词
community pharmacy; computerized decision support systems; medication; pharmacists; prescribing; IMPROVE PRESCRIBING SAFETY; DRUG-INTERACTION ALERTS; DISPENSING SOFTWARE; PATIENT OUTCOMES; PRACTITIONER PERFORMANCE; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; SYSTEMS; CARE; QUALITY; PROMPT;
D O I
10.1111/jcpt.12168
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
What is known and objective: Clinical decision support software (CDSS) has been increasingly implemented to assist improved prescribing practice. Reviews and studies report generally positive results regarding prescribing changes and, to a lesser extent, patient outcomes. Little information is available, however, concerning the use of CDSS in community pharmacy practice. Given the apparent paucity of publications examining this topic, we conducted a review to determine whether CDSS in community pharmacy practice can improve medication use and patient outcomes. Methods: A literature search of articles on CDSS relevant to community pharmacy and published between 1 January 2005 and 21 October 2013 was undertaken. Articles were included if the healthcare setting was community pharmacy and the article indicated that pharmacy use of CDSS was part of the study intervention. Results and discussion: Eight studies were found which assessed counselling, selected drug interactions, inappropriate prescribing and under-prescribing. One study was halted due to insufficient data collection. Six studies showed statistically significant improvements in the measured outcomes: increased patient counselling, 31% reduced frequency of drug-drug interactions (DDIs), reduced frequency of inappropriate medications in the elderly (2.2-1.8% patients) and in pregnant women (5.5-2.9% patients), and increased pharmacists' interventions for under-prescribed low-dose aspirin (1.74 vs. 0.91 per 100 patients with type 2 diabetes) and over-prescribed high-dose proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) (1.67 vs. 0.17 interventions per 100 high-dose PPI prescriptions). What is new and conclusion: Most studies showed improved prescribing practice, via direct communication between pharmacists and doctors or indirectly via patient education. Factors limiting the impact of improved prescribing included alert fatigue and clinical inertia. No study investigated patient outcomes and little investigation had been undertaken on how CDSS could be best implemented. Few studies have been undertaken in community pharmacy practice, and based on the positive findings reported, further research should be directed in this area, including investigation of patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 348
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Review of computerized clinical decision support in community pharmacy
    不详
    [J]. PHARMACEUTICAL CARE ESPANA, 2015, 17 (02): : 357 - 357
  • [2] Systematic review of computerized prescriber order entry and clinical decision support
    Velez-Diaz-Pallares, Manuel
    Perez-Menendez-Conde, Covadonga
    Bermejo-Vicedo, Teresa
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2018, 75 (23) : 1909 - 1921
  • [3] Standard practices for computerized clinical decision support in community hospitals: a national survey
    Ash, Joan S.
    McCormack, James L.
    Sittig, Dean F.
    Wright, Adam
    McMullen, Carmit
    Bates, David W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2012, 19 (06) : 980 - 987
  • [4] Computerized Clinical Decision Support: Will it Transform Healthcare?
    Basit Chaudhry
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2008, 23 : 85 - 87
  • [5] Nature and frequency of drug therapy alerts generated by clinical decision support in community pharmacy
    Heringa, M.
    Floor-Schreudering, A.
    Tromp, C.
    de Smet, P.
    Bouvy, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2016, 38 (02) : 489 - 490
  • [6] Nature and frequency of drug therapy alerts generated by clinical decision support in community pharmacy
    Heringa, Mette
    Floor-Schreudering, Annemieke
    Tromp, P. Chris
    de Smet, Peter A. G. M.
    Bouvy, Marcel L.
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2016, 25 (01) : 82 - 89
  • [7] Computerized clinical decision support: Will it transform healthcare?
    Chaudhry, Basit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 23 (Suppl 1) : 85 - 87
  • [8] Clinical decision support systems in community pharmacies: a scoping review
    Moon, Jukrin
    Chladek, Jason S.
    Wilson, Paije
    Chui, Michelle A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2024, 31 (01) : 231 - 239
  • [9] Do providers use computerized clinical decision support systems? A systematic review and meta-regression of clinical decision support uptake
    Andrew Kouri
    Janet Yamada
    Jeffrey Lam Shin Cheung
    Stijn Van de Velde
    Samir Gupta
    [J]. Implementation Science, 17
  • [10] Do providers use computerized clinical decision support systems? A systematic review and meta-regression of clinical decision support uptake
    Kouri, Andrew
    Yamada, Janet
    Cheung, Jeffrey Lam Shin
    Van de Velde, Stijn
    Gupta, Samir
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2022, 17 (01)