Methods for estimating uncertainty in factor analytic solutions

被引:382
|
作者
Paatero, P. [1 ]
Eberly, S. [2 ]
Brown, S. G. [3 ]
Norris, G. A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Phys, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Geometr Tools LLC, Redmond, WA USA
[3] Sonoma Technol Inc, Petaluma, CA USA
[4] US EPA, Off Res & Dev, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
基金
美国国家环境保护局;
关键词
POSITIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION; MULTIVARIATE CURVE RESOLUTION; SOURCE APPORTIONMENT; FEASIBLE SOLUTIONS; BAND BOUNDARIES; MODELS; PM2.5;
D O I
10.5194/amt-7-781-2014
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The EPA PMF (Environmental Protection Agency positive matrix factorization) version 5.0 and the underlying multilinear engine-executable ME-2 contain three methods for estimating uncertainty in factor analytic models: classical bootstrap (BS), displacement of factor elements (DISP), and bootstrap enhanced by displacement of factor elements (BS-DISP). The goal of these methods is to capture the uncertainty of PMF analyses due to random errors and rotational ambiguity. It is shown that the three methods complement each other: depending on characteristics of the data set, one method may provide better results than the other two. Results are presented using synthetic data sets, including interpretation of diagnostics, and recommendations are given for parameters to report when documenting uncertainty estimates from EPA PMF or ME-2 applications.
引用
收藏
页码:781 / 797
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ANALYTIC METHODS OF FACTOR ROTATION
    WARBURTON, FW
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1963, 16 (02): : 165 - 174
  • [2] Analytic formula for estimating the α-particle preformation factor
    Deng, Jun-Gang
    Zhang, Hong-Fei
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 2020, 102 (04)
  • [3] AN ANALYTIC STRUCTURE FACTOR FOR MACROION SOLUTIONS
    HAYTER, JB
    PENFOLD, J
    [J]. MOLECULAR PHYSICS, 1981, 42 (01) : 109 - 118
  • [4] EFFICIENCY OF UNCERTAINTY PROPAGATION METHODS FOR ESTIMATING OUTPUT
    Mohammadi, Samira
    Cremaschi, Selen
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER-AIDED PROCESS DESIGN, 2019, 47 : 487 - 492
  • [5] Comparison of methods for estimating the uncertainty of value at risk
    Gamba-Santamaria, Santiago
    Fernando Jaulin-Mendez, Oscar
    Fernando Melo-Velandia, Luis
    Andres Quicazan-Moreno, Carlos
    [J]. STUDIES IN ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2016, 33 (04) : 595 - 624
  • [6] OBLIQUE FACTOR ANALYTIC SOLUTIONS BY ORTHOGONAL TRANSFORMATIONS
    HARRIS, CW
    KAISER, HF
    [J]. PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1964, 29 (04) : 347 - 362
  • [7] Methods of calculating emissions of pollutants into the atmosphere and estimating their uncertainty
    Velichko, O. N.
    Gordienko, T. B.
    [J]. MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2009, 52 (02) : 193 - 199
  • [8] Methods of calculating emissions of pollutants into the atmosphere and estimating their uncertainty
    O. N. Velichko
    T. B. Gordienko
    [J]. Measurement Techniques, 2009, 52 : 193 - 199
  • [9] Estimating the uncertainty of a primary acoustic standard by numerical methods
    Chalyi, VP
    Parakuda, VV
    Kosterov, AA
    Gaiduk, NV
    Faida, AM
    [J]. MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2005, 48 (05) : 438 - 444
  • [10] Estimating uncertainty of correlated quantities - Comparison of two methods
    Konopka, Krzysztof
    [J]. 2007 IEEE INSTRUMENTATION & MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-5, 2007, : 1086 - 1091