Applying Mixed Methods in Action Research: Methodological Potentials and Advantages

被引:67
|
作者
Ivankova, Nataliya [1 ,2 ]
Wingo, Nancy [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Hlth Profess, Birmingham, AL USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Nursing, Birmingham, AL USA
关键词
mixed methods research; action research; methodological framework; an integrated research approach; practical problem; stakeholders;
D O I
10.1177/0002764218772673
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Mixed methods research has the capacity to intersect with other approaches, such as action research, by adding a solid methodological foundation and creating an integrated approach for addressing complex practical problems. Conceptual, philosophical, and procedural similarities between mixed methods and action research make integration possible and justifiable. Combining the two approaches can produce more scientifically sound and transferable results by synergistically integrating qualitative stakeholder engagement with quantitative outcomes to inform action/intervention planning, implementation, evaluation, and monitoring. We describe similarities between the two approaches, discuss advantages of applying mixed methods in action research, and illustrate applications using a methodological framework that captures their synergistic combination. Using this framework, we describe how two studies employed mixed methods in various phases of the action research cycle.
引用
收藏
页码:978 / 997
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mixed methods research and management: advantages and implications
    Molina Azorin, Jose Francisco
    Lopez Gamero, Maria Dolores
    Pereira Moliner, Jorge
    Pertusa Ortega, Eva Maria
    Tari Guillo, Juan Jose
    [J]. CUADERNOS DE ECONOMIA Y DIRECCION DE LA EMPRESA, 2012, 15 (02): : 55 - 62
  • [2] METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF APPLYING QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN HISTORICAL RESEARCH
    KAKHK, II
    KOVALCHENKO, ID
    [J]. SOVIET STUDIES IN HISTORY, 1975, 14 (03): : 3 - 28
  • [3] Publishing a Methodological Mixed Methods Research Article
    Fetters, Michael D.
    Freshwater, Dawn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MIXED METHODS RESEARCH, 2015, 9 (03) : 203 - 213
  • [4] METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF APPLYING MATHEMATICAL-METHODS TO HISTORICAL RESEARCH
    KHVOSTOVA, KV
    [J]. VOPROSY ISTORII, 1975, (11) : 97 - 112
  • [5] METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF APPLYING MATHEMATICAL-METHODS IN HISTORICAL RESEARCH
    KHVOSTOVA, KV
    [J]. SOVIET STUDIES IN HISTORY, 1977, 15 (04): : 3 - 31
  • [6] Mixed methods: A methodological smorgasbord for social pharmacy research
    Aronson, Benjamin D.
    [J]. RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2013, 9 (06): : 647 - 650
  • [7] Striving for Methodological Integrity in Mixed Methods Research: The Difference Between Mixed Methods and Mixed-Up Methods
    Creamer, Elizabeth G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2018, 107 (04) : 526 - 530
  • [8] Arts and Mixed Methods Research: An Innovative Methodological Merger
    Archibald, Mandy M.
    Gerber, Nancy
    [J]. AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 2018, 62 (07) : 956 - 977
  • [9] Mixed Methods Research: The Pursuit of Successful Methodological Pairing
    Risling, Tracie
    Bally, Jill
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2017, 16 (01):
  • [10] Applying mixed methods research in evaluating clinical trials
    Murphy, Lyn
    Maguire, William
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN ACCOUNTING AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 8 (01): : 72 - +