Do less populous countries receive more development assistance for health per capita? Longitudinal evidence for 143 countries, 1990-2014

被引:5
|
作者
Martinsen, Lene [1 ]
Ottersen, Trygve [1 ]
Dieleman, Joseph L. [2 ]
Hessel, Philipp [3 ]
Kinge, Jonas Minet [4 ]
Skirbekk, Vegard [5 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Int Hlth, Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Washington, IHME, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Andes, Alberto Lleras Camargo Sch Govt, Bogota, Colombia
[4] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Oslo, Norway
[5] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Ctr Fertil & Hlth, Oslo, Norway
来源
BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH | 2018年 / 3卷 / 01期
关键词
AID ALLOCATION; BILATERAL AID; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000528
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Per capita allocation of overall development assistance has been shown to be biased towards countries with lower population size, meaning funders tend to provide proportionally less development assistance to countries with large populations. Individuals that happen to be part of large populations therefore tend to receive less assistance. However, no study has investigated whether this is also true regarding development assistance for health. We examined whether this so-called 'small-country bias' exists in the health aid sector. Methods We analysed the effect of a country's population size on the receipt of development assistance for health per capita (in 2015 US$) among 143 countries over the period 1990-2014. Explanatory variables shown to be associated with receipt of development assistance for health were included: gross domestic product per capita, burden of disease, under-5 mortality rate, maternal mortality ratio, vaccination coverage (diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis) and fertility rate. We used the within-between regression analysis, popularised by Mundluck, as well as a number of robustness tests, including ordinary least squares, random-effects and fixed-effects regressions. Results Our results suggest there exists significant negative effect of population size on the amount of development assistance for health per capita countries received. According to the within-between estimator, a 1% larger population size is associated with a 0.4% lower per capita development assistance for health between countries (-0.37, 95% CI -0.45 to -0.28), and 2.3% lower per capita development assistance for health within countries (-2.29, 95% CI -3.86 to -0.72). Conclusions Our findings support the hypothesis that small-country bias exists within international health aid, as has been previously documented for aid in general. In a rapidly changing landscape of global health and development, the inclusion of population size in allocation decisions should be challenged on the basis of equitable access to healthcare and health aid effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] Official development assistance, income per capita and health outcomes in developing countries: Is Africa different?
    Nwude, E. Chuke
    Ugwoke, Robinson O.
    Uruakpa, Peter Chinyere
    Ugwuegbe, Ugochukwu Sebastine
    Nwonye, Nnenna G.
    COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2020, 8 (01):
  • [2] Do per capita health care expenditures converge among OECD countries? Evidence from unit root tests with level and trend-shifts
    Payne, James E.
    Anderson, Stephanie
    Lee, Junsoo
    Cho, Myeong Hyeon
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2015, 47 (52) : 5600 - 5613
  • [3] How do development assistance partners conceptualise and prioritise evidence in Priority Setting (PS) for health programmes relevant to low income countries? A qualitative study
    Kapiriri, Lydia
    Sinding, Christina
    Arnold, Emmy
    EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2017, 13 (02): : 255 - 273