Integrated water quality management

被引:18
|
作者
Novotny, V
机构
关键词
diffuse pollution; maximal daily load; total process; use attainability analysis; watershed management; water quality planning; water quality standards; water body assessment; water quality management;
D O I
10.1016/0273-1223(96)00206-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Components of the integrated water quality management and planning process are described. The process is initiated by the Use Attainability Analysis (UAA) in which the ambient water quality-use based standards are justified and/or modified for the water body for which water quality management is being considered. The UAA has three components: (1) Water Body Assessment, (2) The Total Maximal Daily Load (TMDL) Process, and (3) Socio-economic Analysis. The first component identifies whether the receiving water body and watershed have a water quality problem and, subsequently, separates such water bodies into those where the water quality problem is caused by natural loads or conditions and those where man-made pollution inputs cause unacceptable water quality deterioration. The TMDL process separates water bodies into those for which water quality goals can be achieved by present and future mandated abatement of point and nonpoint sources (effluent limited water bodies) and those mandated abatement will not achieve the water quality goals (water quality limited water bodies). Extensive water quality management and expenditure of public funds is justified for the latter cases. Watersheds and receiving water bodies which are adversely affected predominantly by nonpoint (unregulated) discharges are declared as impaired and should be managed. Both reduction of waste discharges and enhancement of waste assimilative capacity-habitat restoration of the receiving water body should be considered in management of water quality limited receiving waterbodies. Copyright (C) 1996 IAWQ.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 7
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrated water quality management for drinking water of good quality
    Isaji, C
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 47 (09) : 15 - 23
  • [2] Integrated water quality management in Brazil
    Braga, B
    Porto, M
    Meneses, L
    [J]. WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN THE AMERICAS, 2006, : 79 - +
  • [3] Integrated water quality management in Harare
    Bekithemba, G
    [J]. WATER AND SANITATION FOR ALL: PARTNERSHIPS AND INNOVATIONS: SELECTED PAPERS OF THE 23RD WEDC CONFERENCE, 1998, : 71 - 74
  • [4] Integrated water quality management: an algal perspective
    Steynberg, MC
    [J]. 22ND INTERNATIONAL WATER SERVICES CONGRESS AND EXHIBITION, 2000, 18 (1-2): : 591 - 595
  • [5] Experience with integrated water quality management in the Wahnbach Watershed
    Clasen, J
    Krämer, R
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 46 (6-7) : 303 - 309
  • [6] Integrated water quality management of the Grosse Dhunn Reservoir
    Scharf, W
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 37 (02) : 351 - 359
  • [7] INSTRUMENTS FOR INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT: WATER QUALITY MODELING FOR SUSTAINABLE WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT
    Barjoveanu, George
    Teodosiu, Carmen
    Cojocariu, Claudia
    Augustijn, Denie
    Craciun, Ioan
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2013, 12 (08): : 1679 - 1690
  • [8] INTEGRATED PEST-MANAGEMENT AND WATER-QUALITY
    MOFFITT, LJ
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY POLICY ISSUES, 1993, 11 (02): : 113 - 120
  • [9] Integrated management of water quality in the Lagoon of Venice (Italy)
    Bendoricchio, G
    Baschieri, P
    [J]. WATER POLLUTION IV: MODELLING, MEASURING AND PREDICTION, 1997, : 745 - 754
  • [10] Dynamic modelling of integrated water resources quality management
    Azmi, Mohammad
    Heidarzadeh, Nima
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-WATER MANAGEMENT, 2013, 166 (07) : 357 - 366