Comparing the reliability and validity of the SF-36 and SF-12 in measuring quality of life among adolescents in China: a large sample cross-sectional study

被引:78
|
作者
Lin, Yanwei [1 ,4 ]
Yu, Yulan [2 ]
Zeng, Jiayong [2 ]
Zhao, Xudong [3 ]
Wan, Chonghua [4 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Med Univ, Sch Humanities & Management, Dept Hlth Sociol, 1 Xincheng Ave, Dongguan 523808, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Guangdong Med Univ, Sch Humanities & Management, Dept Psychol, 1 Xincheng Ave, Dongguan 523808, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Tongji Univ, Inst Psychosomat Med, East Translat Med Platform, 50 Chifeng Ave, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[4] Guangdong Med Univ, Res Ctr Qual Life & Appl Psychol, Key Lab Qual Life & Psychol Assessment & Interven, 50 Chifeng Ave, Dongguan 523808, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Quality of life; Reliability; Validity; Discrimination; Average information; SF36; SF12; Chinese adolescents; FORM HEALTH SURVEY; CHILDREN; SCALES; TESTS; RESPONSIVENESS; COUNTRIES; DISEASE; HIP;
D O I
10.1186/s12955-020-01605-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective We compare the reliability and validity of the Short Form 36 (version 1, SF-36) and the Short Form 12 (version 1, SF-12) in adolescence, the period of life when a child develops into an adult, i.e., the period from puberty to maturity terminating legally at the age of majority (10-19 years), thus supplying evidence for the selection of instruments measuring the quality of life (QOL) and decision-making processes of adolescents in China. Methods Stratified cluster random sampling was adopted according to geographical location, and the SF-36 was administered to assess QOL. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to show correlation. Cronbach's alpha and construct reliability (CR) were used to evaluate the reliability of SF-36 and SF-12, while criterion validity and average variance extracted (AVE, convergence validity) were used to evaluate validity. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to calculate the load factors for the items of the SF-36 and SF-12, then to obtain the CR and AVE. The Semejima grade response model (logistic two-parameter module) in item response theory was used to estimate item discrimination, item difficulty, and item average information for the items of the SF-36 and SF-12. Results 19,428 samples were included in the study. The mean age of respondents was 14.78 years (SD = 1.77). Reliability of each domain of the SF-36 was better than for the corresponding domain of the SF-12. The domains of PF, RP, BP, and GH in SF-36 had good construct reliability (CR > 0.6). The criterion validities of some domains of the SF-36 were a little higher in some corresponding dimensions of the SF-12, except for PCS. The convergence validities of the SF-12 were higher than the SF-36 in PF, RP, BP, and PCS. The items of BP, SF, RP, and VT in the SF-12 had acceptable discrimination of items that were higher than in the SF-36. The items' average amounts of information on BP, VT, SF, RE, and MH in the SF-36 and SF-12 were poor. Conclusion Two component (PCS and MCS) measurements of the SF-12 appeared to perform at least as well as the SF-36 in cross-sectional settings in adolescence, but the reliability and validity of the 8 domains of the SF-36 were better than those of the SF-12. Some domains, for instance SF and BP, were not suitable for adolescents or need to be studied further.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing the reliability and validity of the SF-36 and SF-12 in measuring quality of life among adolescents in China: a large sample cross-sectional study
    Yanwei Lin
    Yulan Yu
    Jiayong Zeng
    Xudong Zhao
    Chonghua Wan
    [J]. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18
  • [2] Quality of life among adolescents: a cross-sectional study using the SF-12 questionnaire
    Silveira, Marise Fagundes
    Almeida, Julio Cesar
    Freire, Rafael Silveira
    Ferreira, Raquel Conceicao
    de Barros Lima Martins, Andrea Eleuterio
    Marcopito, Luiz Francisco
    [J]. CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2013, 18 (07): : 2007 - 2015
  • [3] Quality of life in cervical dystonia: Reliability and validity of the SF-36
    Welsh, M
    Welsh, J
    Regalado, G
    Lew, MF
    [J]. ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1998, 44 (03) : 516 - 516
  • [4] Assessing health-related quality of life among coronary patients: SF-36 vs SF-12
    Failde, I.
    Medina, P.
    Ramirez, C.
    Arana, R.
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH, 2009, 123 (09) : 615 - 617
  • [5] Reliability and validity of the SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire in patients with brain tumors: a cross-sectional study
    Adomas Bunevicius
    [J]. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 15
  • [6] Reliability and validity of the SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire in patients with brain tumors: a cross-sectional study
    Bunevicius, Adomas
    [J]. HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2017, 15
  • [7] The quality of life in patients with chronic pancreatitis evaluated using the SF-12 questionnaire: A comparative study with the SF-36 questionnaire
    Pezzilli, R
    Morselli-Labate, AM
    Frulloni, L
    Cavestro, GM
    Ferri, B
    Comparato, G
    Gullo, L
    Corinaldesi, R
    [J]. DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2006, 38 (02) : 109 - 115
  • [8] Comparison of Completion Rates for SF-36 Compared With SF-12 Quality of Life Surveys at a Tertiary Urban Wound Center
    Kim, Paul J.
    Kumar, Anagha
    Elmarsafi, Tammer
    Lehrenbaum, Hannah
    Anghel, Ersilia
    Steinberg, John S.
    Evans, Karen K.
    Attinger, Christopher E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2017, 56 (05): : 1031 - 1035
  • [9] Measurement of quality of life in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis being treated with infliximab - A comparison of SF-36 and SF-12
    Haibel, H
    Niewerth, M
    Brandt, J
    Rudwaleit, M
    Listing, J
    Sieper, J
    Braun, J
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR RHEUMATOLOGIE, 2004, 63 (05): : 393 - 401
  • [10] Quality of life in thalassemia major: Reliability and validity of the Persian version of the SF-36 questionnaire
    Jafari, H.
    Lahsaeizadeh, S.
    Jafari, P.
    Karimi, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2008, 54 (04) : 273 - 275