A unit hydrograph rainfall-runoff model using Mathematica

被引:3
|
作者
Hromadka, TV [1 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ Fullerton, Dept Math, Fullerton, CA 92634 USA
关键词
unit hydrographs; rainfall-runoff models; runoff hydrographs; optimization;
D O I
10.1016/S1364-8152(99)00030-4
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Many of the most commonly used rainfall-runoff computer programs involve runoff generation and hood hydrograph routing algorithms that reduce into Toeplitz matrix systems (see Hromadka II and Whitley, 2000, ASCE Journal of Hydrolic Engineering, submitted for publication). A link-node model representation of the watershed is constructed by subdividing the watershed into numerous subareas, and connecting the subareas by a network of hydrologic routing links (using Muskingum, convex, convolution, or pure translation methods). The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center's computer program HEC-1, or related programs, is used to implement the details of the link-node modeling. In contrast, the single-area unit hydrograph model approach represents a watershed as a single subarea, and utilizes a single unit hydrograph to represent all the effects being modeled by a link-node model representation. The system of Toeplitz matrices developed in Hromadka II and Whitley (2000) precisely describes the single-area and link-node model structures as they are actually applied; namely, in discretized timestep unit period additions and multiplications. It was shown that the single-area unit hydrograph model structure similar to the link-node unit hydrograph model structure; namely, both structures are Toeplitz matrix systems of the same dimension. It was also shown that the calibrated single-area unit hydrograph model Toeplitz matrices which are developed by direct calibration to gauged data achieves the minimum variance between the model structure and the available rainfall-runoff data. In this paper, a computer program is presented that implements the procedures presented in Hromadka II and Whitley (2000) for optimizing the unit hydrograph method. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 160
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A parsimonious geomorphological unit hydrograph for rainfall-runoff modelling in small ungauged basins
    Grimaldi, S.
    Petroselli, A.
    Nardi, F.
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2012, 57 (01): : 73 - 83
  • [2] Rainfall-runoff response, event-based runoff coefficients and hydrograph separation
    Blume, Theresa
    Zehe, Erwin
    Bronstert, Axel
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2007, 52 (05): : 843 - 862
  • [3] The role of hydrograph indices in parameter estimation of rainfall-runoff models
    Shamir, E
    Imam, B
    Morin, E
    Gupta, HV
    Sorooshian, S
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2005, 19 (11) : 2187 - 2207
  • [4] USING A DISTRIBUTED ROUTING RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODEL
    DOYLE, WH
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES BULLETIN, 1981, 17 (02): : 225 - 232
  • [5] Flood hydrograph attenuation induced by a reservoir system: analysis with a distributed rainfall-runoff model
    Montaldo, N
    Mancini, M
    Rosso, R
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2004, 18 (03) : 545 - 563
  • [6] Instantaneous unit hydrograph evaluation for rainfall-runoff modeling of small watersheds in North and South Central Texas
    Cleveland, Theodore G.
    He, Xin
    Asquith, William H.
    Fang, Xing
    Thompson, David B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2006, 132 (05) : 479 - 485
  • [7] The PDM rainfall-runoff model
    Moore, R. J.
    [J]. HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2007, 11 (01) : 483 - 499
  • [8] The ARNO rainfall-runoff model
    Todini, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1996, 175 (1-4) : 339 - 382
  • [9] REGIONAL MONTHLY RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODEL
    MIMIKOU, M
    RAO, AR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1983, 109 (01): : 75 - 93
  • [10] A robust rainfall-runoff transfer model
    Capkun, G
    Davison, AC
    Musy, A
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2001, 37 (12) : 3207 - 3216