Performance Evaluation of Multimodal Transportation Systems

被引:20
|
作者
Kumar, P. Phani [1 ]
Parida, Manoranjan [2 ]
Swami, Mansha [2 ]
机构
[1] IIT Roorkee, Roorkee 247667, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] IIT Roorkee, Dept Civil Engn, Roorkee 247667, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Multimodal Public Transport Systems; Access time; Egress time; Performance Measures; ACCESSIBILITY; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.174
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Connectivity of more than one mode to a line haul in an urban area constitutes the multimodal transport system of the city. In this paper New Delhi has been taken up as a case study to evaluate performance of multimodal transportation system (MMTS), where metro became main mode in routine public transport trips. Public transport in Delhi carries only about 60% of total vehicular person trips as against 80% of the expected population size of the city. The present bus services, metro rail and IRBT (Integrated Rail-cum-Bus Transit), if implemented as planned together are estimated to carry about 15 million trips per day by 2021. Since, all the public transport trips are multimodal, it is necessary to evaluate the performance of multimodal transportation systems. The study is divided into two phases. In the first phase, the study of travel time elements (access time, transfer time, waiting time, line-haul time, and egress time) is done. Next, the influence of access and egress times on the total travel time is examined. Use is made of a comprehensive commuter travel diary to collect detail travel time estimates. A representative commuter survey, with 460 respondents, is drawn on platform at each station of Red Line and Yellow Line (Kashmiri Gate - Saket) Delhi Metro. Implementing the Second phase of study, performance measures such as Travel Time Ratio, Level of Service, Interconnectivity Ratio, Passenger Waiting Index, and Running Index were evaluated. Interconnectivity ratio (proportion of access and egress time w.r.t total travel time) for various combinations such as Mixed-Metro-Mixed, Walk-Metro-Walk, Walk-Metro-Bus and Walk-Bus-Walk has been observed. Travel Time (defined as the time differential between private transport and public transport) ratio shows much variation with trip direction, time of day, mode used, and distance travelled, etc.,. Level of Service Indicator (Out-of-vehicle Travel Time/In-Vehicle Travel Time) ratio inferred that people spends more time out-of-vehicle as compared to that of in-vehicle. Access time, transfer time, waiting time and egress time are the most important and complex travel time elements that transport systems should consider improving its efficiency and modal share. The results can be used in planning catchment area of public transport. Access and egress (together with waiting and transfer times) appear as factors that affect effectiveness and performance of a multimodal transportation system to a larger extent as unacceptable distances are likely to reduce ridership patronage. At the same time, there are key deciding factors when a trip originates as to whether the commuter shall choose public transit over personal mode of travel. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:795 / 804
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance measures for multimodal transportation systems
    Pratt, Richard H.
    Lomax, Timothy J.
    Transportation Research Record, 1996, (1518): : 85 - 93
  • [2] Scheduling multimodal transportation systems
    Castelli, L
    Pesenti, R
    Ukovich, W
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 155 (03) : 603 - 615
  • [3] Beyond objective performance evaluation in multimodal biometric systems
    Toledano, Doroteo T.
    Hernandez Trapote, Alvaro
    Diaz Pardo De Vera, David
    Fernandez Pozo, Ruben
    Hernandez Gomez, Luis
    ANNALES DES TELECOMMUNICATIONS-ANNALS OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS, 2007, 62 (1-2): : 156 - 176
  • [4] Performance evaluation framework for sustainable freight transportation systems
    Pathak, Devendra Kumar
    Thakur, Lakshman S.
    Rahman, Shams
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2019, 57 (19) : 6202 - 6222
  • [5] EVALUATION OF EARTHQUAKE PERFORMANCE OF HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS.
    Kawakami, Hideji
    Doboku Gakkai ronbun hokokushu, 1982, (327): : 1 - 12
  • [6] Dynamic and stochastic routing for multimodal transportation systems
    Demeyer, Sofie
    Audenaert, Pieter
    Pickavet, Mario
    Demeester, Piet
    IET INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS, 2014, 8 (02) : 112 - 123
  • [7] Performance evaluation of watermarking techniques for secure Multimodal biometric systems
    Moon, D
    Kim, T
    Jung, SH
    Chung, Y
    Moon, K
    Ahn, D
    Kim, SK
    COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY, PT 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3802 : 635 - 642
  • [8] Performance evaluation of score level fusion in multimodal biometric systems
    He, Mingxing
    Horng, Shi-Jinn
    Fan, Pingzhi
    Run, Ray-Shine
    Chen, Rong-Jian
    Lai, Jui-Lin
    Khan, Muhammad Khurram
    Sentosa, Kevin Octavius
    PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2010, 43 (05) : 1789 - 1800
  • [9] A Framework for Performance Evaluation of Communication Alternatives for Intelligent Transportation Systems
    Ma, Yongchang
    Zhou, Yan
    Chowdhury, Mashrur
    Wang, Kuang-Ching
    Fries, Ryan N.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2009, 13 (03) : 111 - 126
  • [10] Sustainable transportation systems performance evaluation using fuzzy logic
    Rajak, Sonu
    Parthiban, P.
    Dhanalakshmi, R.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 71 : 503 - 513