Dissociating between object affordances and spatial compatibility effects using early response components

被引:27
|
作者
Wilf, Meytal [1 ,2 ]
Holmes, Nicholas P. [3 ]
Schwartz, Isabella [4 ]
Makin, Tamar R. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Dept Neurobiol, Jerusalem, Israel
[2] Weizmann Inst Sci, Dept Neurobiol, IL-76100 Rehovot, Israel
[3] Univ Reading, Sch Psychol & Clin Language Sci, Ctr Integrat Neurosci & Neurodynam, Reading, Berks, England
[4] Hadassah Med Ctr, Rehabil Dept, IL-91120 Jerusalem, Israel
[5] Univ Oxford, FMRIB Ctr, Nuffield Dept Clin Neurosci, Oxford OX3 9DU, England
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2013年 / 4卷
关键词
affordance; amputees; EMG; hand; stimulus-response; SELECTIVE PERTURBATION; PREHENSION MOVEMENTS; VISUAL INPUT; SPACE; HAND; POTENTIATION; ACTIVATION; CONFLICT; TASK;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00591
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Perception and action are tightly linked: objects may be perceived not only in terms of visual features, but also in terms of possibilities for action. Previous studies showed that when a centrally located object has a salient graspable feature (e.g., a handle), it facilitates motor responses corresponding with the feature's position. However, such so-called affordance effects have been criticized as resulting from spatial compatibility effects, due to the visual asymmetry created by the graspable feature, irrespective of any affordances. In order to dissociate between affordance and spatial compatibility effects, we asked participants to perform a simple reaction-time task to typically graspable and non-graspable objects with similar visual features (e.g., lollipop and stop sign). Responses were measured using either electromyography (EMG) on proximal arm muscles during reaching-like movements, or with finger key-presses. In both EMG and button press measurements, participants responded faster when the object was either presented in the same location as the responding hand, or was affordable, resulting in significant and independent spatial compatibility and affordance effects, but no interaction. Furthermore, while the spatial compatibility effect was present from the earliest stages of movement preparation and throughout the different stages of movement execution, the affordance effect was restricted to the early stages of movement execution. Finally, we tested a small group of unilateral arm amputees using EMG, and found residual spatial compatibility but no affordance, suggesting that spatial compatibility effects do not necessarily rely on individuals' available affordances. Our results show dissociation between affordance and spatial compatibility effects, and suggest that rather than evoking the specific motor action most suitable for interaction with the viewed object, graspable objects prompt the motor system in a general, body-part independent fashion.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dissociating affordance and spatial compatibility effects using a pantomimed reaching action
    Couth, Samuel
    Gowen, Emma
    Poliakoff, Ellen
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2014, 232 (03) : 855 - 864
  • [2] Dissociating affordance and spatial compatibility effects using a pantomimed reaching action
    Samuel Couth
    Emma Gowen
    Ellen Poliakoff
    [J]. Experimental Brain Research, 2014, 232 : 855 - 864
  • [3] Dissociating object- and response-based components of negative priming through effects of practice
    Houghton, G
    Marí-Beffa, P
    [J]. PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2005, 67 (08): : 1423 - 1436
  • [4] Dissociating object- and response-based components of negative priming through effects of practice
    George Houghton
    Paloma Marí-Beffa
    [J]. Perception & Psychophysics, 2005, 67 : 1423 - 1436
  • [5] Stimulus-response compatibility effects during object semantic categorisation: Evocation of grasp affordances or abstract coding of object size?
    Haddad, Lilas
    Wamain, Yannick
    Kalenine, Solene
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 77 (01): : 29 - 41
  • [6] The impact of response type on affordance and spatial compatibility effects in human and object interactions
    Demir, Pinar
    Sandikci, Melda
    Demir, Eda
    Soyman, Efe
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2024,
  • [7] Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus-response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities
    Boyer, Ty W.
    Longo, Matthew R.
    Bertenthal, Bennett I.
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2012, 139 (03) : 440 - 448
  • [8] How affordances associated with a distractor object affect compatibility effects: A study with the computational model TRoPICALS
    Daniele Caligiore
    Anna M. Borghi
    Domenico Parisi
    Rob Ellis
    Angelo Cangelosi
    Gianluca Baldassarre
    [J]. Psychological Research, 2013, 77 : 7 - 19
  • [9] How affordances associated with a distractor object affect compatibility effects: A study with the computational model TRoPICALS
    Caligiore, Daniele
    Borghi, Anna M.
    Parisi, Domenico
    Ellis, Rob
    Cangelosi, Angelo
    Baldassarre, Gianluca
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2013, 77 (01): : 7 - 19
  • [10] Responding to object files: Automatic integration of spatial information revealed by stimulus-response compatibility effects
    Hommel, B
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 55 (02): : 567 - 580