Optimal credit allocation for buy-and-hold investors - A top-down, strategic approach.

被引:0
|
作者
Dynkin, L [1 ]
Hyman, J
Phelps, BD
机构
[1] Lehman Brothers, New York, NY USA
[2] Lehman Brothers, Tel Aviv, Israel
来源
JOURNAL OF PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT | 2004年 / 30卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.3905/jpm.2004.73
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The trade-offs between risk and return are different for buy-and-hold investors and total return investors. For buy-and-hold investors, the portfolio return distribution is asymmetric; the maximum return is the yield, and the maximum loss is represented by default. The standard tools that total return investors use for top-down asset allocation (such as mean-variance optimization) and bottom-up security selection (such as multifactor risk models) are thus inappropriate. A more suitable approach for buy-and-hold investors, given current spreads, default rates and correlations, and loss tolerance, derives an optimal macro allocation across credit qualities. Application of this approach yields an optimized portfolio to minimize expected shortfall due to defaults, subject to a spread target and other portfolio constraints. The results suggest buy-and-hold investors should first determine their allocations to the A and Baa sectors, and then use an optimizer to select individual names.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / +
页数:20
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] A Top-Down Approach to Multiname Credit
    Giesecke, Kay
    Goldberg, Lisa R.
    Ding, Xiaowei
    [J]. OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2011, 59 (02) : 283 - 300
  • [2] Strategic Resource Allocation: Top-Down, Bottom-Up, and the Value of Strategic Buckets
    Hutchison-Krupat, Jeremy
    Kavadias, Stylianos
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2015, 61 (02) : 391 - 412
  • [3] Integrating embedded design principles throughout the engineering curriculum: The top-down approach.
    Hadjilogiou, J
    Oak, A
    Leyba, K
    [J]. ESA'03: PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMBEDDED SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS, 2003, : 299 - 305
  • [4] The Top-Down/Bottom-Up Controversy from a Constructionist Approach. A Method for Measuring Top-Down Effects Applied to a Sample of Older People
    Fabio Leonardi
    Linana Spazzafumo
    Fiorella Marcellini
    Cristina Gagliardi
    [J]. Social Indicators Research, 1999, 48 (2) : 189 - 218
  • [5] The top-down/bottom-up controversy from a constructionist approach. A method for measuring top-down effects applied to a sample of older people
    Leonardi, F
    Spazzafumo, L
    Marcellini, F
    Gagliardi, C
    [J]. SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 1999, 48 (02) : 187 - 216
  • [6] A combined top-down and bottom-up approach to integrated task-decomposition, and allocation
    Öztürk, P
    Gundersen, OE
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2004 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-7, 2004, : 163 - 168
  • [7] Explainable AI Evaluation: A Top-Down Approach for Selecting Optimal Explanations for Black Box Models
    Mirzaei, SeyedehRoksana
    Mao, Hua
    Al-Nima, Raid Rafi Omar
    Woo, Wai Lok
    [J]. INFORMATION, 2024, 15 (01)
  • [8] An Integrated Top-down and Bottom-up Task Allocation Approach in Social Sensing based Edge Computing Systems
    Zhang, Daniel
    Wang, Dong
    [J]. IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS (IEEE INFOCOM 2019), 2019, : 766 - 774
  • [9] New institutions in European rural development programmes:: Between the top-down and bottom-up approach.: The case of Andalusia (Southern Spain)
    Del Mar Delagdo, M
    Ramos, E
    Cañizares, E
    [J]. ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS IN RURAL POLICIES AND AGRICULTURAL MARKETS, 2004, : 439 - 452
  • [10] Top-down method for lab-scale production of nanocrystals of active molecules: Formulation approach and selection of optimal process parameters
    Nikolic, Ines
    Savic, Snezena
    Randjelovic, Danijela
    Lunter, Dominique Jasmin
    [J]. 2019 INTERNATIONAL SEMICONDUCTOR CONFERENCE (CAS 2019), 42ND EDITION, 2019, : 155 - 158