Department-level cultures and the improvement of learning and teaching

被引:139
|
作者
Knight, PT [1 ]
Trowler, PR
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Cartmel Coll, Dept Educ Res, Lancaster LA1 4YW, England
[2] Univ Cent Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, Lancs, England
关键词
D O I
10.1080/030750700116028
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article argues that good practice in teaching and learning in the English-speaking world may be compromised by structural changes in the higher education system. The impact of these changes is, however, affected by leadership practices and working cultures at the departmental level. These can, it is argued, assist in the development of 'deeper' teaching and learning practices even in a context which may be seen as unfavourable to them. Rejecting simplistic notions of transformational leadership and organisational cultural engineering, the article identifies activity systems at the local, departmental, level as the central loci of changes in approaches to and recurrent practices in teaching and learning. Desirable change is most likely to be achieved in collective and collaborative ways, which means that change processes are contingent and contextualised, and that outcomes are unpredictable and fuzzy. The data in this article come fi om in-depth interviews with academics in England and Canada; from one author's previous studies; and from literatures on faculty's work environments in English-speaking countries.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 83
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Leadership for teaching and learning: Exploring a department-level educational leadership role at a Swedish comprehensive university
    Frisk, Sylva
    Apelgren, Britt-Marie
    Sandoff, Mette
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION & LEADERSHIP, 2023, 51 (06) : 1461 - 1477
  • [2] Development and use of an instrument for assessing the department-level work environment: The department-level environment questionnaire (DLEQ)
    Ward G.
    Fisher D.L.
    [J]. Learning Environments Research, 2013, 16 (1) : 113 - 130
  • [3] Framework for department-level accountability to diversify engineering
    Jacqueline C. Linnes
    Erika Moore
    Ana Maria Porras
    Elizabeth Wayne
    Patrick M. Boyle
    Lesley W. Chow
    Katharina Maisel
    Shelly R. Peyton
    Sarah E. Stabenfeldt
    Kelly R. Stevens
    Jessica O. Winter
    Rebecca Kuntz Willits
    [J]. Nature Reviews Bioengineering, 2024, 2 (6): : 521 - 530
  • [4] Organization quality systems and department-level strategies: refinement of the Deepening our Understanding in Quality in Australia (DUQuA) organization and department-level scales
    Clay-Williams, Robyn
    Taylor, Natalie
    Winata, Teresa
    Ting, Hsuen P.
    Arnolda, Gaston
    Braithwaite, Jeffrey
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2020, 32 : 22 - 34
  • [5] Drugs, violence, and development in Colombia:: A department-level analysis
    Holmes, Jennifer S.
    Gutierrez de Pineres, Sheila Amin
    Curtin, Kevin M.
    [J]. LATIN AMERICAN POLITICS AND SOCIETY, 2006, 48 (03) : 157 - 184
  • [6] The dependability of NSSE scalelets for college- and department-level assessment
    Pike, Gary R.
    [J]. RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2006, 47 (02) : 177 - 195
  • [7] Guest editorial: NSF sponsored department-level reform initiative
    Dewoolkar, Mandar M.
    [J]. Advances in Engineering Education, 2010, 2 (04):
  • [8] The Dependability of NSSE Scalelets for College- and Department-level Assessment*
    Gary R. Pike
    [J]. Research in Higher Education, 2006, 47 : 177 - 195
  • [9] Designing for institutional transformation: Six principles for department-level interventions
    Quan, Gina M.
    Corbo, Joel C.
    Finkelstein, Noah D.
    Pawlak, Alanna
    Falkenberg, Karen
    Geanious, Christopher
    Ngai, Courtney
    Smith, Clara
    Wise, Sarah
    Pilgrim, Mary E.
    Reinholz, Daniel L.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2019, 15 (01):
  • [10] AN OPTIMAL DECISION SUPPORT MODEL FOR DEPARTMENT-LEVEL PROMOTION MIX PLANNING
    ALLAWAY, A
    MASON, JB
    BROWN, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 1987, 63 (03) : 215 - 242