Evaluation of Secondhand Smoke Exposure in New York City Public Housing After Implementation of the 2018 Federal Smoke-Free Housing Policy

被引:22
|
作者
Thorpe, Lorna E. [1 ]
Anastasiou, Elle [1 ]
Wyka, Katarzyna [2 ]
Tovar, Albert [1 ]
Gill, Emily [1 ]
Rule, Ana [3 ]
Elbel, Brian [1 ]
Kaplan, Sue A. [1 ]
Jiang, Nan [1 ]
Gordon, Terry [4 ]
Shelley, Donna [5 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Grossman Sch Med, Dept Populat Hlth, 180 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] CUNY, Grad Sch Publ Hlth & Hlth Policy, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth & Engn, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] NYU, Dept Environm Med, Grossman Sch Med, 550 1St Ave, New York, NY 10016 USA
[5] NYU, Dept Publ Hlth Policy & Management, Sch Global Publ Hlth, New York, NY USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO-SMOKE; UNITED-STATES; PARTICULATE MATTER; CIGARETTE-SMOKING; 6; CITIES; NONSMOKERS; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES; CANCER; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.24385
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Importance Secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure is associated with many health conditions in children and adults. Millions of individuals in the US are currently exposed to SHS in their homes. Objective To investigate whether a federal ban on smoking in public housing settings was associated with a decrease in indoor SHS levels in New York City public housing developments 12 months after the policy's implementation. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study tracked indoor air quality longitudinally from April 2018 to September 2019 and used difference-in-differences analysis to examine SHS exposure before vs after implementation of the 2018 federal smoke-free housing (SFH) policy in 10 New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) buildings vs 11 matched low-income buildings not subject to the SFH policy (ie, Section 8 buildings). Exposures Federal SFH policy implementation, beginning July 30, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures Comparison of nicotine concentration levels from passive, bisulfate-coated filters before vs 12 months after implementation of the federal SFH policy. Secondary outcomes included changes in particulate matter less than 2.5 mu m in diameter, measured with low-cost particle monitors, and counts of cigarette butts in common areas. Results Air quality was measured repeatedly in a total of 153 NYCHA and 110 Section 8 nonsmoking households as well as in 91 stairwells and hallways. Before the SFH policy implementation, air nicotine was detectable in 19 of 20 stairwells (95.0%) in NYCHA buildings and 15 of 19 stairwells (78.9%) in Section 8 buildings (P = .19) and in 17 of 19 hallways (89.5%) in NYCHA buildings and 14 of 23 hallways (60.9%) in Section 8 buildings (P = .004). Nicotine was detected less frequently inside nonsmoking apartments overall (26 of 263 [9.9%]) but more frequently in NYCHA apartments (20 of 153 [13.1%]) than in Section 8 apartments (6 of 110 [5.5%]) (P = .04). One year after policy implementation, there was no differential change over time in nicotine concentrations measured in stairwells (DID, 0.03 mu g/m(3); 95% CI, -0.99 to 1.06 mu g/m(3)) or inside nonsmoking households (DID, -0.04 mu g/m(3); 95% CI, -0.24 to 0.15 mu g/m(3)). Larger decreases in nicotine concentration were found in NYCHA hallways than in Section 8 hallways (DID, -0.43 mu g/m(3); 95% CI, -1.26 to 0.40 mu g/m(3)). Conclusions and Relevance The findings suggest that there was no differential change in SHS in NYCHA buildings 12 months after SFH policy implementation. Additional support may be needed to ensure adherence to SFH policies. Question Was implementation of a federal smoke-free housing policy prohibiting indoor smoking in public housing associated with a decrease in secondhand smoke 12 months later? Findings In this cohort study tracking indoor air quality inside the homes of 263 nonsmoking families and in common areas across 10 New York City public housing buildings vs 11 matched low-income buildings not subject to the smoke-free housing policy, no differential change in air nicotine or levels of particulate matter between housing types was found. Meaning The findings suggest that additional support may be needed to ensure adherence to smoke-free housing policies and achieve desired public health outcomes. This cohort study examines whether the 2018 implementation of a federal ban on smoking in public housing settings was associated with a decrease in indoor levels of secondhand smoke in New York City (NYC) public housing developments 12 months later.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Implementation of a Smoke-free Policy in Subsidized Multiunit Housing: Effects on Smoking Cessation and Secondhand Smoke Exposure
    Pizacani, Barbara A.
    Maher, Julie E.
    Rohde, Kristen
    Drach, Linda
    Stark, Michael J.
    [J]. NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2012, 14 (09) : 1027 - 1034
  • [2] Changes in Reported Secondhand Smoke Incursions and Smoking Behavior after Implementation of a Federal Smoke-Free Rule in New York State Federally Subsidized Public Housing
    Curry, Laurel E.
    Feld, Ashley L.
    Rogers, Todd
    Coats, Ellen M.
    Nonnemaker, James
    Anker, Elizabeth
    Ortega-Peluso, Christina
    Battles, Haven
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (06)
  • [3] Increases in Secondhand Smoke After Going Smoke-Free: An Assessment of the Impact of a Mandated Smoke-Free Housing Policy
    Plunk, Andrew D.
    Rees, Vaughan W.
    Jeng, Anna
    Wray, Jasilyn A.
    Grucza, Richard A.
    [J]. NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (12) : 2254 - 2256
  • [4] Implementing the Federal Smoke-Free Public Housing Policy in New York City: Understanding Challenges and Opportunities for Improving Policy Impact
    Jiang, Nan
    Gill, Emily
    Thorpe, Lorna E.
    Rogers, Erin S.
    de Leon, Cora
    Anastasiou, Elle
    Kaplan, Sue A.
    Shelley, Donna
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (23)
  • [5] Secondhand Smoke Exposure and Smoke-Free Policy Support Among Public Housing Authority Residents in Rural and Tribal Settings
    Schmidt, Lisa M.
    Reidmohr, Alison A.
    Helgerson, Steven D.
    Harwell, Todd S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2016, 41 (06) : 1116 - 1121
  • [6] Secondhand Smoke Exposure and Smoke-Free Policy Support Among Public Housing Authority Residents in Rural and Tribal Settings
    Lisa M. Schmidt
    Alison A. Reidmohr
    Steven D. Helgerson
    Todd S. Harwell
    [J]. Journal of Community Health, 2016, 41 : 1116 - 1121
  • [7] The impact of a smoke-free policy on environmental tobacco smoke exposure in public housing developments
    MacNaughton, Piers
    Adamkiewicz, Gary
    Arku, Raphael E.
    Vallarino, Jose
    Levy, Douglas E.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 557 : 676 - 680
  • [8] Perceptions about the Federally Mandated Smoke-Free Housing Policy among Residents Living in Public Housing in New York City
    Jiang, Nan
    Thorpe, Lorna
    Kaplan, Sue
    Shelley, Donna
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (10)
  • [9] EVIDENCE OF SUPPORT FOR SMOKE-FREE PUBLIC HOUSING AMONG NEW YORK CITY RESIDENTS
    Farley, Shannon M.
    Schroth, Kevin R. J.
    Curtis, Christine Johnson
    Angell, Sonia
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2016, 131 (01) : 2 - 3
  • [10] Implementation and enforcement of smoke-free policies in public housing
    Kegler, Michelle C.
    Lea, Jaimie
    Lebow-Skelley, Erin
    Lefevre, Adrienne M.
    Diggs, Pam
    Haardorfer, Regine
    [J]. HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2019, 34 (02) : 234 - 246