Dutch COVID-19 lockdown measures increased trust in government and trust in science: A difference-in-differences analysis

被引:60
|
作者
Groeniger, Joost Oude [1 ,2 ]
Noordzij, Kjell [2 ]
van der Waal, Jeroen [2 ]
de Koster, Willem [2 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, POB 2040, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Dept Publ Adm & Sociol, POB 1738, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
基金
荷兰研究理事会;
关键词
COVID-19 lockdown measures; Difference-in-differences; Institutional trust; Netherlands; Trust in government; Trust in science; PUBLIC TRUST; POLITICAL TRUST; RISK PERCEPTION; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113819
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Many governments have implemented strict lockdown measures to prevent the transmission of the new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). Compliance with these restrictions is vital and depends greatly on the level of trust in the institutions central to their development and implementation. The objectives of this study were to assess: (1) the effects of the Dutch lockdown measures imposed in March 2020 on trust in government and trust in science; and (2) whether these differ across social groups. We draw on unique data from the high-quality Longitudinal Internet Studies for the Social Sciences panel, which comprises a true probability sample of Dutch households (average participation rate: 80.4%). Our data were collected on an ongoing basis from December 2017 to March 2020 (n = 2219). Using the implementation of lockdown measures in mid-March as a natural experiment, we employed difference-in-differences analyses to assess the causal effect of the Dutch lockdown measures on trust in government and trust in science. We estimated that the imposition of the measures caused an 18% increase (95% confidence interval (CI):15%?21%)) in trust in government and a 6% increase (95% CI: 4%?8%) in trust in science. The impact on trust in government was greater among the participants aged 65 and older and those with poor self-assessed health, although the relevant CIs were wide and, in the case of self-assessed health, included the null. No differential effects were observed for trust in science. Our study indicates that the strict public-health measures imposed in the Netherlands during an acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic generated trust in the institutions involved in drafting and implementing them, especially among those with a higher risk of serious health outcomes. This suggests that, to prevent a major public-health crisis, people appreciate firm government intervention during the acute phase of an infectious disease pandemic.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Trust in physicians and trust in government predict COVID-19 vaccine uptake
    Viskupic, Filip
    Wiltse, David L.
    Meyer, Brittney A.
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2022, 103 (03) : 509 - 520
  • [2] When and How Trust in Government Leads to Compliance with COVID-19 Precautionary Measures
    Shanka, Mesay Sata
    Menebo, Mesay Moges
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2022, 139 : 1275 - 1283
  • [3] Trust made the difference for democracies in COVID-19
    Bollyky, Thomas J.
    Angelino, Olivia
    Wigley, Simon
    Dieleman, Joseph L.
    [J]. LANCET, 2022, 400 (10353): : 657 - 657
  • [4] Trust in government increased during the Covid-19 pandemic in Australia and New Zealand
    Goldfinch, Shaun
    Taplin, Ross
    Gauld, Robin
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2021, 80 (01) : 3 - 11
  • [5] In trust we trust: The impact of trust in government on excess mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Louis Zaki, Bishoy
    Nicoli, Francesco
    Wayenberg, Ellen
    Verschuere, Bram
    [J]. PUBLIC POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION, 2022, 37 (02) : 226 - 252
  • [6] The Covid-19 containment effects of public health measures: A spatial difference-in-differences approach
    Kosfeld, Reinhold
    Mitze, Timo
    Rode, Johannes
    Waelde, Klaus
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2021, 61 (04) : 799 - 825
  • [7] COVID-19: a stress test for trust in science
    不详
    [J]. LANCET, 2020, 396 (10254): : 799 - 799
  • [8] COVID-19 and government trust: A spiral of silence analysis in South America
    Croucher, Stephen M.
    Spencer, Anthony
    Bustamante, Sandra
    Nguyen, Thao
    Gomez, Oscar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATION GAZETTE, 2023,
  • [9] Identity, trust, and the experiences of refugees during a COVID-19 lockdown
    Nungsari, Melati
    Chuah, Hui Yin
    Flanders, Sam
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (08):
  • [10] Fear, trust, and compliance with COVID-19 measures: a study of the mediating effect of trust in government on the relationship between fear and compliance
    Hrbkova, Lenka
    Kudrnac, Ales
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC POLICY, 2024,