Postabortion Contraceptive Use and Continuation When Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Is Free

被引:24
|
作者
Goyal, Vinita [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Canfield, Caitlin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Aiken, Abigail R. A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dermish, Amna [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Potter, Joseph E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Populat Res Ctr, 305 E 23rd St,Stop G1800, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, LBJ Sch Publ Affairs, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[3] Planned Parenthood Greater Texas, Austin, TX 78712 USA
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2017年 / 129卷 / 04期
关键词
INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTION; REPEAT ABORTION; WOMEN; INSERTION; SERVICES; BARRIERS; TEXAS; PROVISION; PLACEMENT; IMPLANT;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000001926
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To compare preference for long-acting contraception (LARC) and subsequent use, year-long continuation, and pregnancy among women after induced abortion who were and were not eligible to participate in a specialized funding program that provided LARC at no cost. METHODS: Between October 2014 and March 2016, we conducted a prospective study of abortion patients at Planned Parenthood in Austin, Texas (located in Travis County). We compared our primary outcome of interest, postabortion LARC use, among women who were eligible for the specialized funding program (low-income, uninsured, Travis County residents) and two groups who were ineligible (low-income, uninsured, non-Travis County residents, and higher income or insured women). Secondary outcomes of interest included preabortion preference for LARC and 1-year continuation and pregnancy rates among the three groups. RESULTS: Among 518 women, preabortion preference for LARC was high among all three groups (low-income eligible: 64%[91/143]; low-income ineligible: 44% [49/112]; and higher income 55% [146/263]). However, lowincome eligible participants were more likely to receive LARC (65% [93/143] compared with 5% [6/112] and 24% [62/263], respectively, P<.05). Specifically, after adjusting for age, race-ethnicity, and education, low-income eligible participants had a 10-fold greater incidence of receiving postabortion LARC compared with low-income ineligible participants (incidence rate ratio 10.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.68-21.91). Among lowincome eligible and higher income women who received postabortion LARC, 1-year continuation was 90% (95% CI 82-97%) and 86% (95% CI 76-97%), respectively. One-year pregnancy risk was higher among lowincome ineligible than low-income eligible women (hazard ratio 3.28, 95% CI 1.15-9.31). CONCLUSION: Preference for postabortion LARC was high among all three eligibility groups, yet women with access to no-cost LARC were more likely to use and continue these methods. Low-income ineligible women were far more likely to use less effective contraception and become pregnant. Specialized funding programs can play an important role in immediate postabortion contraceptive provision, particularly in settings where state funding is limited.
引用
收藏
页码:655 / 662
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Postabortion Contraception: Qualitative Interviews On Counseling and Provision of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods
    Morse, Jessica
    Freedman, Lori
    Speidel, J. Joseph
    Thompson, Kirsten M. J.
    Stratton, Laura
    Harper, Cynthia C.
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2012, 44 (02) : 100 - 106
  • [2] Postpartum Contraception Education: Contraceptive Choice and Use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC)
    Vaglio, Meghan E.
    Satterwhite, Catherine
    Wieneke, Carrie
    Fitzgerald, Sharon
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 : 63S - 63S
  • [3] Regional variation in postabortion initiation of long-acting reversible contraception in New Zealand
    Rose, Sally B.
    Garrett, Susan M.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 56 (03): : 315 - 322
  • [4] Long-Acting Reversible Contraception With Contraceptive Implants and Intrauterine Devices
    Averbach, Sarah
    Hofler, Lisa
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 327 (20): : 2013 - 2014
  • [5] Familiarity and acceptability of long-acting reversible contraception and contraceptive choice
    Paul, Rachel
    Huysman, Bridget C.
    Maddipati, Ragini
    Madden, Tessa
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (04) : S884.e1 - S884.e9
  • [6] METHODS OF CONTRACEPTIVE PROVISION AND THE UPTAKE OF LONG-ACTING REVERSIBLE CONTRACEPTION
    Madden, T.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2016, 94 (04) : 408 - 408
  • [7] Comparing contraceptive choices among postabortion patients with and without free access to long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods
    Goyal, V
    Aiken, A. R. A.
    Dermish, A.
    Potter, J. E.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2015, 92 (04) : 385 - 386
  • [8] Strengthening Postabortion Family Planning Services in Ethiopia: Expanding Contraceptive Choice and Improving Access to Long-Acting Reversible Contraception
    Samuel, Melaku
    Fetters, Tamara
    Desta, Demeke
    [J]. GLOBAL HEALTH-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2016, 4 : S60 - S72
  • [9] Long-Acting Reversible Contraception
    不详
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2018, 63 (04) : 499 - 500
  • [10] Long-Acting Reversible Contraception
    Baker, Courtney C.
    Creinin, Mitchell D.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 140 (05): : 883 - 897