Similar Overall Survival Using Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Primary Debulking Surgery in Patients Aged Over 75 Years with High-Grade Ovarian Cancer

被引:4
|
作者
Piedimonte, Sabrina [1 ]
Kessous, Roy [1 ]
Laskov, Ido [1 ]
Abitbol, Jeremie [1 ]
Kogan, Liron [1 ]
Yasmeen, Amber [1 ]
Salvador, Shannon [1 ]
Lau, Susie [1 ]
Gotlieb, Walter H. [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Jewish Gen Hosp, Segal Canc Ctr, Div Gynecol Oncol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
ovarian neoplasm; neoadjuvant therapy; cytoreduction surgical procedures; chemotherapy; adjuvant; age factors; STAGE III/IV OVARIAN; PERITONEAL CANCERS; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jogc.2020.04.014
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To perform a hypothesis-generating evaluation of patient outcomes following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) compared with those following primary debulking surgery (PDS) in patients over age 75 with high-grade ovarian cancer. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients aged 75 years and older, with high-grade ovarian cancer. Data were analyzed in SPSS 25.0 using descriptive statistics to characterize groups based on primary treatment modality, Kaplan-Meier survival curves to estimate overall and progression-free survival, and Cox proportional hazards to analyze confounders. Results: Of 429 patients with stages III and IV high-grade ovarian cancer (endometrioid and serous), 71 were aged older than 75 years and met our criteria for inclusion; 58 were treated with NACT while 13 underwent primary debulking. Sixteen patients did not undergo interval debulking following NACT. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the groups. Following NACT, more patients were completely debulked-36.2% versus 21% (P = 0.000)-and had a shorter length of stay (5 vs. 7 d; P = 0.018). Overall survival was similar between the NACT and PDS groups (58.7 vs. 59.7 mo; LR -0.836; P = 0.361) despite lower progression-free survival in the NACT group (25.9 vs. 47.1 mo; P = 0.042; LR 4.31). Both progression-free and overall survival were significantly higher when patients undergoing NACT achieved complete debulking (21.7 and 102.3 mo, respectively) compared with suboptimal debulking (12.03 and 14.2 mo, respectively). Conclusion: In this select group older patients with stage III and IV high-grade ovarian cancers, neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be considered without compromising outcomes and contributes to complete debulking. (C) 2020 The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada/La Societe des obstetriciens et gynecologues du Canada. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1339 / 1345
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SINGLE INSTITUTION EXPERIENCE WITH NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY COMPARED TO PRIMARY DEBULKING SURGERY IN PATIENTS OVER 75 WITH HIGH GRADE OVARIAN CANCER
    Piedimonte, S.
    Kessous, R.
    Laskov, I.
    Abitbol, J.
    Kogan, L.
    Yasmeen, A.
    Lau, S.
    Salvador, S.
    Gotlieb, W. H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2019, 29 : A648 - A648
  • [2] NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY VERSUS PRIMARY DEBULKING SURGERY IN ADVANCED HIGH GRADE OVARIAN CANCER PATIENTS : A COHORT STUDY
    Girard, N.
    Asmar, J.
    Rance, B.
    Bats, A. S.
    Rossi, L.
    Gosset, M.
    Delomenie, M.
    Bonsang-Kitzis, H.
    Lecuru, F.
    Ngo, C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2018, 28 : 690 - 690
  • [3] NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY VERSUS PRIMARY DEBULKING SURGERY IN ADVANCED HIGH GRADE OVARIAN CANCER PATIENTS : A COHORT STUDY
    Girard, N.
    Asmar, J.
    Rance, B.
    Bats, A. S.
    Delomenie, M.
    Rossi, L.
    Gosset, M.
    Lecuru, F.
    Ngo, C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2017, 27 : 1506 - 1506
  • [4] Primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for patients with advanced ovarian cancer
    Zheng, Hong
    Gao, Yu-Nong
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 24 (04) : 304 - 309
  • [5] Primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for patients with advanced ovarian cancer
    Hong Zheng
    Yu-Nong Gao
    [J]. Chinese Journal of Cancer Research, 2012, 24 (04) : 304 - 309
  • [6] Primary debulking surgery versus primary neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high grade advanced stage ovarian cancer: comparison of survivals
    Kobal, Borut
    Noventa, Marco
    Cvjeticanin, Branko
    Barbic, Matija
    Meglic, Leon
    Herzog, Marusa
    Bordi, Giulia
    Vitagliano, Amerigo
    Saccardi, Carlo
    Skof, Erik
    [J]. RADIOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 52 (03) : 307 - 319
  • [7] PRIMARY DEBULKING SURGERY OR NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOLLOWED BY INTERVAL DEBULKING SURGERY FOR PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER?
    Mansouri, H.
    Zemni, I.
    Ben Safta, I.
    Achouri, L.
    Ben Hassouna, J.
    Hechiche, M.
    Chargui, R.
    Rahal, K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2019, 29 : A120 - A120
  • [8] Ovarian cancer patients selected for neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus primary debulking surgery are not similar: A National Cancer Data Base study
    Leiserowitz, G. S.
    Lin, J. F.
    Tergas, A. I.
    Cliby, B. A.
    Bristow, R. E.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 137 : 40 - 41
  • [9] Primary debulking surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with epithelial ovarian cancer
    Xu, Z.
    Justiniano, C. F.
    Fleming, F. J.
    Boscoe, F. P.
    Schymura, M. J.
    Rubinsak, L. A.
    Morrow, G.
    Minasian, L.
    Temkin, S. M.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 149 : 78 - 78
  • [10] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus primary debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer
    Vergote, IB
    De Wever, I
    Decloedt, J
    Tjalma, W
    Van Gramberen, M
    van Dam, P
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2000, 27 (03) : 31 - 36