Readmission and Reoperation After Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

被引:16
|
作者
Hokenstad, Erik D. [1 ]
Glasgow, Amy E. [2 ]
Habermann, Elizabeth B. [2 ]
Occhino, John A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Gynecol Surg, Rochester, MN USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Robert D & Patricia E Kern Ctr Sci Hlth Care Deli, Rochester, MN USA
来源
关键词
readmission; reoperation; pelvic organ prolapse; surgical complications; quality improvement; ERAS(R) SOCIETY RECOMMENDATIONS; 30-DAY HOSPITAL READMISSION; ENHANCED RECOVERY; CARE; GUIDELINES; PROGRAM; RISK;
D O I
10.1097/SPV.0000000000000379
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: We aimed to determine the rates of readmission and reoperation for patients undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant User File was used to select all surgeries performed for POP from 2012 through 2014. The cohort was then reviewed for unplanned readmissions and unplanned reoperations within 30 days of POP surgery. Patient and procedural factors associated with readmission or reoperation were compared using chi(2) analyses and Student t test. Multi-variable logistic regression determined independent risk factors for both readmission and reoperation. Results: A total of 23,419 patients underwent surgery for POP. Of these, there were 435 (1.9%) readmissions and 341 (1.5%) reoperations within 30 days. Median numbers of days from index procedure to readmission or reoperation were 9 and 8 days, respectively. Those who were readmitted had higher American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) scores, longer operative times, and longer lengths of stay than those who were not readmitted (all P < 0.001). Patients who underwent unplanned reoperation also had higher ASA scores, longer operative times, and longer lengths of stay than those who did not undergo reoperation (all P < 0.01). The most common reasons for readmission were surgical site infection (SSI) (19.3%) and non-SSI (15.9%). The most common reason for reoperation was urologic (27.6%) such as cystoscopy or stent placement. Conclusions: Readmission and reoperation rates are relatively low for patients undergoing surgery for POP. Infection, both SSI and non-SSI, accounted for 35.2% of readmissions. Identification of ASA score of 3 or higher, longer total operating time, and increased length of stay is associated with unplanned readmission and reoperation.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 135
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Readmission and Reoperation After Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Hokenstad, Erik D.
    Glasgow, Amy E.
    Habermann, Elizabeth B.
    Occhino, John A.
    [J]. OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2017, 72 (07) : 409 - 410
  • [2] REOPERATION FOR ANY REASON AFTER PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE SURGERY WITH MESH
    Bartley, Jamie M.
    Sirls, Larry T.
    Killinger, Kim A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E880 - E880
  • [3] Reoperation after hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse
    Adams-Piper, E.
    Guaderrama, N.
    Whitcomb, E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 216 (03) : S571 - S572
  • [4] Risk factors for readmission after minimally invasive pelvic organ prolapse surgery
    Berger, A.
    Tan-Kim, J.
    Menefee, S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (06) : S771 - S772
  • [5] Reoperation for pelvic organ prolapse within 10 years of primary surgery for prolapse
    Philipp T. Gotthart
    Thomas Aigmueller
    Peter F. J. Lang
    George Ralph
    Vesna Bjelic-Radisic
    Karl Tamussino
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2012, 23 : 1221 - 1224
  • [6] Reoperation for pelvic organ prolapse within 10 years of primary surgery for prolapse
    Gotthart, Philipp T.
    Aigmueller, Thomas
    Lang, Peter F. J.
    Ralph, George
    Bjelic-Radisic, Vesna
    Tamussino, Karl
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2012, 23 (09) : 1221 - 1224
  • [7] RATES AND RISK FACTORS FOR REOPERATION FOR PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE AFTER ROBOTIC SACROCOLPOPEXY
    Kuhlmann, Paige
    Dallas, Kai
    Chen, Andrew
    Scott, Victoria
    Anger, Jennifer
    Eilber, Karyn
    [J]. NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2021, 40 : S160 - S161
  • [8] Timing of recurrence after surgery in pelvic organ prolapse
    Roos, Eveline J.
    Schuit, Ewoud
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2021, 32 (08) : 2169 - 2176
  • [9] DEFINING "SUCCESS" AFTER SURGERY FOR PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE
    Barber, M.
    Brubaker, L.
    Nygaard, I
    Wheeler, T.
    Schaffer, J.
    Chen, Z.
    Spino, C.
    [J]. NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2009, 28 (07) : 590 - 591
  • [10] Sexual outcome after pelvic organ prolapse surgery
    Fatton, B.
    [J]. PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2009, 19 (13): : 1037 - 1059